ANALISIS KONTRIBUSI USAHATANI PADI SAWAH TADAH HUJAN TERHADAP PENDAPATAN RUMAH TANGGA PETANI DI DESA PARARAPAK KABUPATEN BARITO SELATAN PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TENGAH

Trisna Anggreini Anggreini, Hepycelsi Milgani, Tri Yuliana Eka Sintha

Abstrak


Abstrak

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk (1) menganalisis pendapatan petani padi sawah tadah hujan berdasarkan luas lahan di Desa Pararapak dan (2) menganalisis kontribusi petani padi sawah tadah hujan terhadap rumah tangga petani di Desa Pararapak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata penerimaan petani padi sawah tadah hujan di Desa Pararapak menunjukkan perbedaan yang cukup signifikan dalam hal luas lahan yang diusahakan oleh petani. Untuk setiap musim tanam, rata-rata penerimaan sebesar Rp.8.755.337,00 untuk luas lahan antara 0,5 dan 1 ha, sedangkan peneriman sebesar Rp.16.870.360,00 untuk luas lebih dari 1 ha. Jumlah biaya yang dikeluarkan rata-rata sebesar Rp 5.411.476,00 untuk luas lahan 0,5-1 ha, dan rata-rata Rp 12.367.857,00 untuk luas lahan lebih dari 1 ha. Pendapatan rata-rata untuk luas lahan 0,5-1 ha adalah Rp 3.247.194,00, dan untuk luas lahan lebih dari 1 ha adalah Rp 4.156.253,00. Dengan kontribusi usahatani padi sawah tadah hujan di Desa Pararapak Kecamatan Dusun Selatan Kabupaten Barito Selatan sebesar 0,51% terhadap pendapatan rumah tangga petani, dibandingkan dengan pendapatan luar pertanian (Karet dan Nanas Parigi) sebesar 96,84% dan non pertanian sebesar 2,61%, dapat disimpulkan bahwa kontribusi usahatani padi sawah tadah hujan sangat rendah terhadap pendapatan rumah tangga petani.

Kata kunci: Pendapatan, padi sawah tadah hujan.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were (1) to analyze the income of rainfed wetland rice farmers based on land area in Pararapak Village, and (2) to analyze the contribution of rainfed wetland rice farmers to farming households in Pararapak Village. The results showed that the average income of rainfed wetland rice farmers in Pararapak Village showed significant differences in terms of land area cultivated by farmers. For each growing season, the average income was Rp.8,755,337 for land areas between 0.5 and 1 ha, while the income was Rp.16,870,360 for land areas of more than 1 ha. The average cost was IDR 5,411,476 for land area of 0.5 to 1 ha, and an average of IDR 12,367,857 for land area of more than 1 ha. The average income for land area 0.5-1 ha is Rp 3,247,194 and for land area more than 1 ha is Rp 4,156,253. With the contribution of rainfed wetland rice farming in Pararapak Village, South Hamlet Subdistrict, South Barito Regency of 0.51% to farmers' household income, compared to off-farm income (rubber and Parigi pineapple) of 96.84% and non-agricultural income of 2.61%, it can be concluded that the contribution of rainfed wetland rice farming to farmers' household income is very low.

Keywords: Income, Rain-fed Rice Paddy


Teks Lengkap:

28-38

Referensi


Ambarita Paska, Nengah Kartika. (2015). The influence of land area, pesticide use, labor, fertilizer on coffee production in Pekutatan District, Jembrana Regency. E-Journal of Development Economics, Udayana University. 4(7). Pp:746-872.

Araujo, Magdalena D., and Agustinus Nubatonis. (2016). Analysis of Production and Marketing of Rice Farming in Tualene Village, North Biboki District, North Central Timor Regency. Agrimor, vol. 1, no. 03, July. 27, 2016, pp. 55-56.

Assis, K., Nurrul Azzah, Z & Mohammad Amizi. 2014. Relationship Between Socioeconomic Factors, Income And Productivity Of Farmers : A Case Study On Pineapple Farmers. International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature. 1(2), Pp 67-78.

Banowati, Eva. (2011). Agricultural Geography. Alumni. Semarang.

Bolda, M. L., Tourte, L., Klonskyk, K. M., & de Moura, R. L. (2005). Sample cost to produce fresh market raspberries. Berkeley, US: University of California Cooperative Extension.

BPS Indonesia. (2019). Results of the 2018 Inter-Census Agricultural Survey (SUTAS). ISSN: 978-602-438-255-1.

Daniel, Moehar. (2001). Introduction to Agricultural Economics. Jakarta:PT Bumi Aksara.

DPP South Barito.(2021). Harvest Area, Production, and Productivity of Rice Fields and Rice Fields in 2021. South Barito.

Fadel Amili, Asda Rauf, Yanti Saleh.(2020). Analysis of Rice Farm Income (Oryza Sativa, L) and its feasibility in Mootilango District, Gorontalo Regency. Journal of Agrinesia Vol. 4 No. 2 March 2020.

Guthrie, R.L. (1985). Characterizing and classifying wetland soils in relation to food production. In: Wetland soils Characterization, classification, and utilization. Proc. Workshop IRRI-SMSS-Bureau of Soils, Philippine Ministry of Agriculture. hal- 11-20.

Hadisapoetra.(2003). Agricultural Development. FP UGM Press. Yogyakarta.

Hamdan, Wihardjaka, dan Achmad. (2009). Exploring the Production Potential of Rainfed Rice Fields. BBPADI.

Hastuti DHD dan Rahim ABD. (2008). Introduction, Theory, and Economic Case of Agriculture. Self-help Spreaders. Jakarta.

Hatta, Heliza Rahmania. (2018). Journal. Expert System of Selection of Agricultural Crops for Dry Land. Mulawarman University Press. Samarinda.

Hero Saputra.(2018). Analysis of Rice Farm Income in Tampa Irrigation Area, Paku District, East Barito District. Thesis.

Hidayatulloh, Noor Insan, Sudrajat.(2022). "Feasibility Analysis of Rainfed Rice Farming in Capar Village, Salem District, Brebes Regency. Galuh Agroinfo Student Scientific Journal, Vol 9, No 1. 2022.

Kernalis, E., Lubis, A., & Ulma, R. O. (2019). Analysis of profits on rainfed rice farming and its contribution to farmers' household income in Jangkat District, Merangin Regency. Journal of AGRISEP: A Study of Agriculture and Agribusiness Socioeconomic Problems, 18(2), 269–278.

Maluhima S, dkk. (2020). The contribution of paddy rice farming to farming families in Amongena II Village, East Langowan District, Minahasa Regency. Journal of AGRIRUD, Volume 1 Number 4, January 2020:515-523.

Miranda M, Mex Sondakh, Esry Laoh. (2020). Characteristics of small-land farmers in Tolok Village, Tompaso District. Scientific Journal of Agri-Socioeconomics Unsrat. Sinta 5 National Journal, Vol 16, No. 1, January 2020: 105-114.

Martina, Yuristia R. (2021). Analysis of household income and expenditure of rice farmers in Sawang District, North Aceh Regency. Journal of Agrica Extension Vol. 15 No. 1 of 2021.

Mufti, Mufti, and Dedi Zargustin. (2017). Land tenure of farming paddy fields and its relationship with the level of impoverishment in Padang Mutung Village, Kampar District, Kampar Regency. Universitas Lancang Kuning Journal of Agribusiness, vol. 19, no. 1, 2017.

Mulyati, Hesti. (2014). Analysis of Production and Income of Rice Farmers in Jono Oge Village, Sigi Biromaru District, Sigi Regency. Agrotekbis, vol. 2, no. 1, 2014.

Prasetya, T. (2006). Application of crop-livestock farming system technology through a farmer group organization approach (a model of agricultural environmental management). In Proceedings of the Seminar on Agricultural Environmental Management. Surakarta, October 1, 2003, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta.

Pratama, Putra. (2014). Analysis of Income and Feasibility of Rice Farming in Sidondo Village 1, Sigi Biromaru District, Sigi Regency. Agrotekbis, vol. 2, no. 1, 2014.

Rumintjap, Veronica, and Abdul Muis. (2014). Analysis of Production and Income of Rice Farmers in Pandere Village, Gumbasa District, Sigi Regency, Central Sulawesi Province. Agrotekbis, vol. 2, no. 3, 2014.

Rustam, Wafda. (2014). Analysis of Income and Feasibility of Rice Cultivation in Randomayang Village, Bambalamotu District, North Mamuju Regency. Agrotekbis, vol. 2, no. 6, 2014.

Silamat, Eddy. (2014). Analysis of the productivity of paddy farming using hand tractors and conventional methods in Rejang Lebong Regency. Agrisep 14 No. 2, 200.

Surantinojo Destreeana. (2021). Economic Study of Coconut Farmer Households in Kauditan District, North Minahasa Regency. Journal. Faculty of Agriculture. Sam Ratulangi University.

Tuong, T. P., & Bouman, B. A. M. (2003). Rice production in water-scarce environments. In W. Kijne, R. Barker, & D. Molden (Eds.), Water productivity in agriculture: Limits and opportunities for improvement (pp. 53–67). Manila, PH: CAB International.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/agricore.v9i2.58060

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


##submission.copyrightStatement##