EXPLORING THE 212 REUNION MOVEMENT: LACK OF TACTICAL INNOVATION AND DECLINING MASS PARTICIPATION
Abstrak
After the 2016 Islamic Defense Action, the 212 Reunion Movement emerged to maintain the euphoria of the December 2, 2016 movement. However, why did this movement decline, and what factors explain it? To answer this question, this research used qualitative methods and process tracing analysis to compare the events of the 212 Reunion Movement from 2017 to 2023. The 212 Reunion Movement declined because they lost momentum to strengthen political influence. For instance, in 2016 and 2017 their momentum was the blasphemy case and the Jakarta elections. Then, in 2018 their momentum was the presidential election. This phenomenon occurred due to several factors, such as the lack of tactical innovation, the strengthening of government repression in restricting the 212 Reunion movement, the decline in government facilitation of the 212 Reunion movement, and the decline in mass participation.
Kata Kunci
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Abdulsalam, H. (2018, December 4). Reuni 212: Benarkah Klaim 8 Juta Peserta? . Tirto.
Batubara, H. (2017, December 2). Ini Kata Politisi Soal Jumlah Massa Reuni 212. Detik News.
BBC. (2017, February 21). Aksi 212: Rizieq Shihab Datang dan Menyeru Penjarakan Ahok. BBC News Indonesia.
Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. The University of Michigan Press.
Edelman, M. (2001). Social Movements: Changing Paradigms and Forms of Politics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 285–317.
Fadhlan, A. N., & Azizah, N. (2023). Politik Identitas di Pilkada: Studi Kasus: Hubungan Aksi 212 Dalam Keterpilihannya Anies-Sandi di Pemilihan Kepala Daerah dan Wakil Kepala Daerah Jakarta Periode 2017 Sampai 2022. Jurnal Communitarian, 4(2), 641–659.
Fatiara, N. (2020, December 2). Beda Reuni 212 Tahun 2020 dengan Reuni 3 Tahun Sebelumnya . Kumparan News.
Galli, A. M. (2016). How Glitter Bombing Lost Its Sparkle: The Emergence and Decline of a Novel Social Movement Tactic. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 21(3), 259–281.
Gamson, W. A. (1975). The Strategy of Social Protest. Dorsey Press.
Jasper, J. M. (2010). Social Movement Theory Today: Toward a Theory of Action? Sociology Compass, 4(11), 965–976.
Jenkins, J. (1985). Foundation Funding of Progressive Social Movements. In Jill R. Shellow (Ed.), Grant Seek Guide: Funding Sourcebook (pp. 7–17). Moyer Bell Ltd.
Klandermans, B., & Oegema, D. (1987). Potentials, Networks, Motivations, and Barriers: Steps toward Participation in Social Movements. American Sociological Review, 52(6), 519–532.
Koopmans, R. (1993). The Dynamics of Protest Waves: West Germany, 1965 to 1989, American Sociological Review 58(5): 637–658. American Sociological Review, 58(5), 637–658.
Kukuh, T. (2016, December 5). Mau Tau Berapa Jumlah Peserta Aksi 212. Jawapos.
McAdam, D. (1982). Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. University of Chicago Press.
McAdam, Doug. (1983). Tactical Innovation and the Pace of Insurgency. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 735–754.
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.
Putra, E. H. (2023, December 2). Reuni 212 Digelar Lagi di Monas Tahun 2023, Ini Perbedaan Mencolok Dibanding Tahun-tahun Sebelumnya. Jakarta Tribun News.
Rachman, Y. (2022, December 2). Peserta Reuni 212 di Masjid At-Tin TMII Membubarkan Diri. Tirto.
Rahadian, T. (2017a, February 11). Rangkuman Aksi Massa Islam, dari 1410 hingga 112. Kumparan News.
Rahadian, T. (2017b, February 21). Aksi Bela Islam 212 Jilil II. Kumparan News.
Ricks, J., & Liu, A. (2018). Process-Tracing Research Designs: A Practical Guide. PS: Political Science and Politics, 51(4), 842–846.
Septiana, E. Nugraha., Alhamdi, Ridho., & Gusmi, A. D. (2020). Aksi 212 dan Kemenangan Anies Sandi pada Pemilihan Gubernur Jakarta 2017. JISPO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 10(2), 211–230.
Sihombing, M. (2017, May 5). Aksi 505: Inilah Situasi Usai Demo . Kabar24.
Staggenborg, S. (1988). The Consequences of Professionalization and Formalization in the Pro-Choice Movement. American Sociological Review, 53(4), 585–606.
Taher, A. P. (2017, April 2). Di Balik Susutnya Massa Aksi Bela Islam. Tirto.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/aliansi.v4i2.65941
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Aliansi : Jurnal Politik, Keamanan Dan Hubungan Internasional Terindeks Di:
Penerbit:
Pusat Studi Keamanan dan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Padjadjaran. Kampus FISIP Universitas Padjadjaran, Gedung D, Lt.2
Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km.21, Jatinangor, Sumedang, Indonesia