REFLECTING ON THE ACHIEVEMENTS OF AGRARIAN REFORM AND ITS IMPACT ON THE ECONOMIC SYSTEM TOWARDS GOLDEN INDONESIA 2045: WEST JAVA CASES
Abstract
Land use and land tenure implemented through agrarian reform in the concept of the Land management paradigm are reflected in praxis that improves people's welfare. The welfare of the people achieved is in line with realizing the vision of Golden Indonesia 2045. The current problematic situation is an argumentative discussion on assessing the success of agrarian reform that improves people's welfare towards the Golden Indonesia 2045. This paper explains with a qualitative descriptive method with a critical constructivism paradigm through an ethnographic approach to reflect on agrarian reform in the frame of the economic system. The research was conducted in West Java Province until 2022. The research data comes from primary data from interviews and secondary data from processed various literature sources. The data is analyzed to understand how agrarian reform can be achieved and provide reflections to earn an economic system that has implications for Indonesia's development in 2045. The results showed that agricultural reform carried out primarily in West Java Province and in general in Indonesia had an impact on economic growth/increase in the economic system in line with realizing the vision of Golden Indonesia 2045, even though there were obstacles, namely disputes, conflicts and judicial cases as the residual economic value of the land.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adamopoulos, T., & Restuccia, D. (2020). Land Reform and Productivity: A Quantitative Analysis with Micro Data. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 12(3), 1–39.
Al-Htaybat, K., & von Alberti-Alhtaybat, L. (2013). Management accounting theory revisited: Seeking to increase research relevance. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(18), 12.
Allan, K. (2013). The Social Lens: An Invitation to Social and Sociological Theory. Sage Publications.
Almond, D., Li, H., & Zhang, S. (2019). Land reform and sex selection in China. Journal of Political Economy, 127(2), 560–585.
Bakker, L., & Moniaga, S. (2010). The space between: Land claims and the law in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Science, 38(2), 187–203.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1997). Qualitative research for education. Allyn & Bacon Boston, MA.
Carroll, C. E. (2016). The SAGE encyclopedia of corporate reputation. Sage Publications.
Dehler, G. E., & Welsh, M. A. (1993). Dialectical inquiry as an instructional heuristic in organization theory and design. Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 79–89.
Enemark, S. (2004). Building land information policies. Proceedings of Special Forum on Building Land Information Policies in the Americas. Aguascalientes, Mexico, 26(27.10), 2004.
Enemark, S. (2006). Understanding the land management paradigm. In Proceedings: Innovative technology for land administration (pp. 17–27). International Federation of Surveyors.
Enemark, S., Williamson, I., & Wallace, J. (2005). Building modern land administration systems in developed economies. Journal of Spatial Science, 50(2), 51–68.
Ge, D., Long, H., Qiao, W., Wang, Z., Sun, D., & Yang, R. (2020). Effects of rural–urban migration on agricultural transformation: A case of Yucheng City, China. Journal of Rural Studies, 76, 85–95.
Giddens, A. (2010). Teori Strukturasi: Dasar-dasar pembentukan struktur sosial masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Herawati, E., Hutagalung, A. S., Sujadi, S., & Lestarini, R. (2021). Regulation of private land banking during the agrarian reform in Indonesia. 1st UMGESHIC International Seminar on Health, Social Science and Humanities (UMGESHIC-ISHSSH 2020), 262–266.
Indonesia, R. (2008). Peraturan Menteri. Pembelian Tenaga Listrik Dari Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Biomassa Dan Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Biogas Oleh PT. Perusahaan Listrik Negara.
Jangka, L. R. A. R. P. (2014). Menengah Nasional 2015-2019 Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.
Jayne, T. S., Muyanga, M., Wineman, A., Ghebru, H., Stevens, C., Stickler, M., Chapoto, A., Anseeuw, W., Van der Westhuizen, D., & Nyange, D. (2019). Are medium‐scale farms driving agricultural transformation in sub‐Saharan Africa? Agricultural Economics, 50, 75–95.
Lee, Z. Y. (2022). Implementation of agrarian reform in North Sumatra, Indonesia: The productiveness of institutional fragmentation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 40(7), 1589–1605.
Li, T. M. (2012). The will to improve: perencanaan, kekuasaan, dan pembangunan di indonesia. Marjin Kiri.
Mahasari, J., Wijaya, P. D. R., & Novidha, F. (2008).Pertanahan dalam Hukum Islam. Gama Media.
Maslikhina, V. Y. (2020). Scenario planning for the development of spatial economic and social systems: Methodological approaches. Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 10, 1839–1868.
Medaline, O., Rafianti, F., & Sembiring, R. (2021). Mapping Community Land in North Sumatra through the Implementation of Agrarian Reform. Forestry, 41, 158–312.
Nurrochmat, D. R., Boer, R., Ardiansyah, M., Immanuel, G., & Purwawangsa, H. (2020). Policy forum: Reconciling palm oil targets and reduced deforestation: Landswap and agrarian reform in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 119, 102291.
Pijanowski, B. C., Gage, S. H., Long, D. T., & Cooper, W. E. (2020). A land transformation model for the Saginaw Bay Watershed. In Landscape Ecology (pp. 183–198). CRC Press.
Purnomo, H., Okarda, B., Dermawan, A., Ilham, Q. P., Pacheco, P., Nurfatriani, F., & Suhendang, E. (2020). Reconciling oil palm economic development and environmental conservation in Indonesia: A value chain dynamic approach. Forest Policy and Economics, 111, 102089.
Purwanto, H., & Nasution, F. A. (2022). Indonesian Peasants’union in the Struggle of Agrarian Reform in Indonesia, Period 1998-2011. Journal of Peasants’ Rights, 1(1), 7–19.
Ramankutty, N., Graumlich, L., Achard, F., Alves, D., Chhabra, A., DeFries, R. S., Foley, J. A., Geist, H., Houghton, R. A., & Goldewijk, K. K. (2006). Global land-cover change: Recent progress, remaining challenges. Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: Local Processes and Global Impacts, 9–39.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.
San Juan, N. V., Aceituno, D., Djellouli, N., Sumray, K., Regenold, N., Syversen, A., Symmons, S. M., Dowrick, A., Mitchinson, L., & Singleton, G. (2021). Mental health and well-being of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: contrasting guidelines with experiences in practice. BJPsych Open, 7(1), e15.
Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage publications.
Spierenburg, M. (2021). Strangers, spirits, and land reforms: Conflicts about land in Dande, Northern Zimbabwe. Brill.
Sumarja, F. X., Firmansyah, A. A., & Wijonugroho, P. (2020). Agrarian Reforms in Indonesia: A Pleasure. ICETLAWBE 2020, 108.
Syarief, E. (2021). Land Dispute Resolution through the Special Land Courts as a Transformative Step in Agrarian Reform in Indonesia. International Journal of Law, 7(2), 123–126.
Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., & Koch, J. (2009). Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 689–709.
Tai, H.-C. (2022). Land reform and politics: a comparative analysis. Univ of California Press.
Wiradi, G. (2009). Seluk beluk masalah agraria: reforma agraria dan penelitian agraria. SAINS Press.
Wu, F. (2022). Land financialisation and the financing of urban development in China. Land Use Policy, 112, 104412.
Yunus, H. S. (2010). Metodologi penelitian wilayah kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 251.
Zhou, Y., Li, X., & Liu, Y. (2020). Rural land system reforms in China: History, issues, measures and prospects. Land Use Policy, 91, 104330.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v9i1.47954
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v9i1.47954.g21147
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Dalu Agung Darmawan, Endriatmo Soetarto, Yudha Heryawan Asnawi, Anggraini Sukmawati, Jamaluddin Mahasari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Cosmogov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.