INDONESIAN DEMOCRACY BEYOND 2024: Coalitional Presidentialism, Presidentialization, and Imperial Presidency
Abstract
During the presidency of Joko Widodo (2014 - 2024), particularly in his second term, Indonesia’s multiparty presidential democracy has witnessed the rise of an "Imperial Presidency." Coined for the first time by American historian Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., in his 1973 book of the same name, this term refers to a president becoming disproportionately powerful and dominant in politics and policymaking. Unlike the US, an imperial president in Indonesia does not face significant opposition from political parties or from the legislature. The existing scholarship has not sufficiently explained why an executive seeks to become dominant even when it does not face a hostile legislature. To understand how Indonesia’s imperial presidency arises, whether it will continue under Jokowi’s successor, and its potential impact on democracy, this article employs three key concepts from comparative politics: coalitional presidentialism, presidential majoritarianism, and the presidentialization of politics. Using the qualitative approach and secondary data analysis, this article argues that without significant opposition from the political parties (legislature), the judiciary, and the public, Indonesia’s imperial presidency is likely to continue and will further erode Indonesian democracy.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bermeo, N. (2016). On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19.
Boese-Schlosser, V. A., Edgell, A. B., Hellmeier, S., Maerz, S. F., & Lindberg, S. I. (2020). Deterring dictatorship: Explaining democratic resilience since 1900. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3605368
Boese, V. A., Edgell, A. B., Hellmeier, S., Maerz, S. F., & Lindberg, S. I. (2021). How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process. Democratization, 28(5), 885–907.
Busch, A. E. (2017). Introduction. In G. J. Schmitt, J. M. Bessette & A. E. Busch (Eds.), The imperial presidency and the constitution (pp. 1-4). Rowman and Littlefield.
Carey, J. M. (1997). Strong candidates for a limited office: Presidentialism and political parties in Costa Rica. In S. Mainwaring & M. S. Shugart (Eds.), Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America (pp.199-224). Cambridge University Press.
Chaisty, P., Cheeseman, N., & Power, T. J. (2014). Rethinking the presidentialism debates: Coalitional politics in cross regional perspective. Democratization 21(1), 72 - 94.
Chaisty, P., Cheeseman, N. & Power, T. J. (2018). Coalitional presidentialism in comparative perspective: Minority presidents in multiparty systems. Oxford University Press.
Cheibub, J. A. (2007). Presidentialism, parliamentarism, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Cheibub, J., A. & Limongi, F. (2010). From conflict to coordination: Perspectives on the study of executive - legislative relations. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudos Legislativos 1(1), 38 - 53.
Cheibub, J., A, Przeworski, A., & Saiegh, S. M. (2004). Government coalitions and legislative success under presidentialism and parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science, 34(4), 565 – 587.
Diamond, L. (2015). Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, 26, 141- 155. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0009
Elgie, R. (2005). From Linz to Tsebelis: Three waves of presidential/parliamentary studies? Democratization, 12(1), 106-122.
Elgie, R., & Passarelli, G. (2018). Presidentialisation: one term, two uses – between deductive exercise and grand historical narrative. Political Studies Review, 17(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929918754500
Hanan, D. (2012). Making presidentialism work: Legislative and executive interaction in Indonesian democracy [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Ohio State University.
Hanan, D. (2014). Menakar presidensialisme multipartai di Indonesia: Upaya mencari format demokrasi yang stabil dan dinamis dalam konteks Indonesia. Mizan.
Hlousek, V. (2015). Two types of presidentialization in the party politics of Central Eastern Europe. Italian Political Science Review, 45(3), 277-299
Jenkins, J. C., & Perrow, C. (1973). Insurgency and the powerless: Farm worker movements in the US. American Sociological Review, 42, 429 - 468.
Kernell, S. (2007). Going public: New strategies of presidential leadership. Washington CQ Press.
Koenig, L. W. (1981). Reassessing the “Imperial Presidency.” Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, 34(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.2307/1173789
Kurzman, C. (1996). Structural opportunity and perceived opportunity in social-movement theory: Evidence from the Iranian revolution of 1979,” American Sociological Review, 61(1), 153–170.
Levitsky, S., & Zieblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die: What history reveals about our future. Penguin Books.
Linz, J. J. (1990). The perils of presidentialism. Journal of Democracy, 1(1), 51 - 69.
Linz, J. J. (1994). Presidential or parliamentary democracy: Does it make a difference? In J. J. Linz & A. Valenzuela (Eds.), The failure of presidential democracy: The case of Latin America (pp. 3-87). John Hopkins University Press.
Mair, P. (1994). Party organization: From civil society to the state. In R. S. Katz & P. Mair (Eds.), How parties organize: Change and adaptation in party organization in western democracies. Sage Publications.
McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970. University of Chicago Press.
McAdam, D., McCarty, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (Eds.) (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge University Press.
Mainwaring, S. (1993). Presidentialism, multipartism, and democracy: The difficult combination. Comparative Political Studies, 26,(2), 198 - 228.
Mietzner, M. (2023). The coalition presidents make presidential power and its limits in democractic Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Pereira, C., Bertholini, F., & Melo, M. 2023. Congruent we govern: Cost of governance in multiparty presidentialism. Government and Opposition, 58(4), 843–861. doi:10.1017/gov.2022.15.
Pika, J. A., & Maltese, J. A. (2010). The politics of the presidency. CQ Press.
Poguntke, T., & Webb, P. (2007). The presidentialization of politics: A comparative studies of modern democracies. Oxford University Press.
Power, T. J. (2010). Optimism, pessimism, and coalitional presidentialism: Debating the institutional design of Brazilian democracy. Bulletin of Latin American Research 29(1), 18-33.
Power, T., & Warburton, E. (Eds.). (2020). Democracy in Indonesia: From stagnation to regression? ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
Raile, E. D., Pereira, C., & Power, T. J. (2011). The executive toolbox: Building legislative support in a multiparty presidential regime. Political Research Quarterly, 64(2), 323–334.
Riker, W. (1962). The theory of political coalitions. Yale University Press.
Samuels, D., & Shugart, M. S. (2010). Presidents, parties, and prime ministers: How the separation of powers affects party organization and behavior. Cambridge University Press.
Savage, C. (2007). The return of the imperial presidency and the subversion of American democracy. Little, Brown and Company.
Schlesinger, A. M. (2004). The imperial presidency. A Mariner Book, Houghton Mifflin Company.
Schock, K. (1999). People power and political opportunities: Social movement mobilization and outcomes in the Philippines and Burma. Social Problems, 46(3), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097105.
Schock, K. (2005). Unarmed insurrection: People power movements in non-democracies. University of Minnesota Press.
Stepan, A., & Skach, C.(1993). Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation. World Politics, 46, 1-22.
Shugart, M. S., & Carey, J. M. (1992). Presidents and assemblies: Constitutional design and electoral dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Tempo, June 9, 2024.
Thurber, J. A. (2009). Rivals for power: Presidential - congressional relations. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Ufen, A. (2006). Political parties in post-Suharto Indonesia: Between politik aliran and 'Philippinisation', GIGA Working Papers. German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
Ufen, A. (2017). Party presidentialization in post-Suharto Indonesia. Contemporary Politics, 24(3), 306–24. doi:10.1080/13569775.2017.1413499.
Warburton, E., & Aspinall, E. (2019). Explaining Indonesia's democratic regression. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 41(2), 255-285.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v11i2.63157
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Djayadi Hanan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Cosmogov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.