Implementation of ERACS to Optimize High-Demand Delivery Services at a Secondary Public Hospital in The Jakarta Region

Eva Oktavia; Soegeng Wahyoedi; Wani Devita Gunardi

doi:10.15416/ijcp.2023.12.1.20

Implementation of ERACS to Optimize High-Demand Delivery Services at a Secondary Public Hospital in The Jakarta Region

Eva Oktavia, Soegeng Wahyoedi, Wani Devita Gunardi

Abstract

The Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean Section (ERACS) method is an effort to improve the quality of cesarean delivery service through standardization of perioperative management, supported by evidence-based medicine. This study assessed the impact of implementing ERACS method on hospital service quality, focusing on patient recovery time and satisfaction. Furthermore, it also measures the influence of age and educational background in moderating the effect of service quality. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted using a consecutive sampling method on 75 patients who underwent ERACS and were selected according to the inclusion criteria. Documentation on patients’ perception of service quality and satisfaction was reviewed post-surgically before discharge. The hypothesis test showed that ERACS has a significant positive effect on patient satisfaction (β= 0.9, p= <0.05), and it has a significant negative effect on length of hospital stay (β= -0.29, p= <0.01). Age and educational background did not moderate the effect of ERACS on patient satisfaction (β= 0.001, p= >0.05 and β= 0.01, p= >0.05, respectively). The education factor also did not moderate the effect of ERACS on the length of hospital stay (β= 0.01, p= >0.05). In contrast, the age factor moderated the effect of ERACS on the length of hospital stay (β= 0.31, p= <0.05). The ERACS method is feasible to be carried out at a level two public hospital with good patient outcomes and satisfaction. Young aged group of patients were good candidates for ERACS accelerated recovery time protocol.

Keywords

cesarean; enhanced recovery; patient satisfaction; perioperative care; public hospital; service quality

Full Text:

PDF

References

Pamilangan ED, Wantani JJE, Lumentut AM. Indikasi Seksio Sesarea di RSUP Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Manado Tahun 2017 dan 2018. e-CliniC. 2019 Dec 31;8(1).

Andayasari L, Muljati S, Sihombing M, Arlinda D, Opitasari C, Mogsa DF, et al. Proporsi Seksio Sesarea dan Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Seksio Sesarea di Jakarta. Bul Penelit Kesehat. 2015;43(2):6–16.

WHO/UNICEF. Global Nutrion Target 2025.Breastfeeding Policy Brief.WHO/MNH/NHD 14.7. 2012;8.

Saimin J, Lianawati L, Yohanis M, Ridwan S. Sosiodemografi Persalinan dengan Seksio Sesarea di RS dr. Ismoyo Kendari (Sociodemographic Profile of Caesarean Birth in dr. Ismoyo Hospital Kendari). Medula. 2020;7(2):68–73.

Bollag L, Nelson G. Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean (ERAC) – Beyond The Pain Scores. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2020;43:36–8.

Habib AS, Ituk U. Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery [version 1; referees: 2 approved]. F1000Research. 2018;7(0):1–11.

Mullman L, Hilden P, Goral J, Gwacham N, Tauro C, Spinola K, et al. Improved Outcomes With an Enhanced Recovery Approach to Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct 1;136(4):685–91.

Baluku M, Bajunirwe F, Ngonzi J, Kiwanuka J, Ttendo S. A randomized controlled trial of enhanced recovery after surgery versus standard of care recovery for emergency cesarean deliveries at Mbarara Hospital, Uganda. Anesth Analg. 2020;130(3):769–76.

Fay EE, Hitti JE, Delgado CM, Savitsky LM, Mills EB, Slater JAL, et al. An enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for cesarean delivery decreases hospital stay and cost. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Mosby Inc.; 2019. p. 349.e1-349.e9.

Junaidi DS, Rajaratnam DA, Safoorah DA. A comparative study of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) versus non enhanced recovery after surgery (Non-ERAS) pathway for caesarean deliveries. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;4(5):93–5.

Kleiman AM, Chisholm CA, Dixon AJ, Sariosek BM, Thiele RH, Hedrick TL, et al. Evaluation of the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol implementation on maternal outcomes following elective cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2020 Aug 1;43:39–46.

Zarei A, Arab M, Froushani AR, Rashidian A, Tabatabaei SMG. Service quality of private hospitals: The Iranian Patients’ perspective. BMC Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2012;12(1):31. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/12/31

Norcross W, Miller TE, Huang S, Kim J, Maza S, Sanders E, et al. Implementation of a Successful Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Program in a Community Hospital. Cureus. 2019 Oct 30.

Bollag L, Lim G, Sultan P, Habib AS, Landau R, Zakowski M, et al. Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology: Consensus Statement and Recommendations for Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean. Anesth Analg. 2021;1362–77.

Caughey AB, Wood SL, Macones GA, Wrench IJ, Huang J, Norman M, et al. Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 2). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec 1;219(6):533–44.

Macones GA, Caughey AB, Wood SL, Wrench IJ, Huang J, Norman M, et al. Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations (part 3). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep 1;221(3):247.e1-247.e9.

Westland JC. Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 2010 Dec 31;9(6):476-87.

Shafiq M, Naeem MA, Munawar Z, Fatima I. Service quality assessment of hospitals in Asian context: An empirical evidence from Pakistan. Inq (United States). 2017;54.

Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden PB, Davidoff F SD. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:986–92.

Rangkuti NA, Harahap MA. Hubungan pengetahuan dan usia ibu hamil dengan kehamilan risiko tinggi di Puskesmas Labuhan Rasoki. Educ Dev [Internet]. 2020;8(4):513–7. Available from: https://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/view/2211/1179.

RI KK. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2019 [Internet]. Hardhana B, Sibuea F, Widiantini W, editors. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan RI; 2020. Available from: file:///C:/File asus lama disk D/Karya ilmiah/ERAS/Profil-Kesehatan-indonesia-2019.pdf.

Noviani, A., Sari M., Septina, H.R. H. Profil Kesehatan Ibu Dan Anak 2020. Badan Pus Stat. 2020;53(9):111–33.

Jakarta DKPD. Profil Kesehatan Provinsi DKI Jakarta Tahun 2019. 2020.

Pelangi B, Anindhita F, Susanti LR. Efektivitas Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional untuk Menurunkan Angka Kematian Ibu. Jakarta: Women Research Institute; 2015. 83 p.

Deniau B, Bouhadjari N, Faitot V, Mortazavi A, Kayem G, Mandelbrot L, et al. Evaluation of a continuous improvement programme of enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery under neuraxial anaesthesia. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med [Internet]. 2016;35(6):395–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2015.11.009.

Guswaman F, Haryadi H, Sutrisna E. Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Dan Karakteristik Sosiodemografi Terhadap Minat Kunjungan Ulang Yang Dimoderasi Oleh Kepuasan Pasien Pada Pelayanan Rawat Jalan Puskesmas Kedungbanteng Kabupaten Banyumas. J Ekon Bisnis, dan Akunt. 2020;21(4).

Sultan P, Sharawi N, Blake L, Carvalho B. Enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery versus standard care studies: a systematic review of interventions and outcomes. Int J Obstet Anesth [Internet]. 2020;43:72–86. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.03.003.

Laronche A, Popescu L, Benhamou D. An enhanced recovery programme after caesarean delivery increases maternal satisfaction and improves maternal-neonatal bonding: A case control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol [Internet]. 2017;210:212–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.034.

Cusack L, Digenis C, Schultz T, Klaer B, Hobbs M. Women’s experiences with enhanced recovery after elective caesarean section with next day discharge: A qualitative study. Midwifery [Internet]. 2020;83:102632. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102632.

Arifin S, Rahman A, Muhyi R, Octaviana Putri A, Hadianor H. Hubungan Usia, Tingkat Pendidikan, Fasilitas Kesehatan Dengan Kepuasan Pasien Di Puskesmas Muara Laung. J Publ Kesehat Masy Indones. 2019;6(2):40–5.

BPJS Kesehatan. Panduan Praktis Sistem Rujukan Berjenjang. 2014.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15416/ijcp.2023.12.1.20