Information Technology Governance Assessment in Higher Education Institution Using COBIT 5 Framework

Helmi Naufal Rafdiansyah; Adhi Alfian; Zaldy Adrianto

doi:10.24198/jaab.v5i2.39703

Information Technology Governance Assessment in Higher Education Institution Using COBIT 5 Framework

Helmi Naufal Rafdiansyah, Adhi Alfian, Zaldy Adrianto

Abstract

Information Technology (IT) is an essential part of overall organizational governance, and higher education is an educational institution that requires IT support. This study aims to evaluate how effective and efficient the implementation of information technology governance at the PTNBH X as measured by COBIT 5 Framework. This study will be an exploratory one that will rely on qualitative data. The domains Evaluate, Direct, and Monitoring (EDM) will be the focus of this study. Data collecting was the first stage of the study, followed by analysis of maturity and gap levels, analysis and problem-solving in the implementation of IT governance and recommendations, and finally conclusions and recommendations. According to the results of PTNBH X's capability level evaluation of the EDM domain, the company is at level 1 (performed process), with a value of 1.4. It means most of the EDM domains in PTNBH X implemented process achieves its process purpose, but not yet at the level that the process is being planned, monitored and adjusted to their needs.

Keywords

Information Technology Governance; Higher Education Institution; COBIT Framework

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adikara, F. (2013). Implementasi Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Perguruan Tinggi Berdasarkan COBIT 5 pada Laboratorium Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak Universitas Esa Unggul. SESINDO 2013, 1-6.

Cohen, A., & Sayag, G. (2010). The effectiveness of internal auditing: an empirical examination of its determinants in Israeli organisations. Australian Accounting Review, 20(3), 296-307.

Erlangga, E., Sucahyo, Y. G., & Hammi, M. K. (2016). The evaluation of information technology governance and the prioritisation of process improvement using control objectives for information and related technology version 5: A case study on the ministry of foreign affairs. 2016 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), 189-194.

Gao, S. S., Gao, G., & Zhang, T. (2008). Corporate governance reform and firm performance: Evidence from China. Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8, 189-209.

Haes, D., Steven, Grembergen, W. V., & Debreceny, R. S. (2013). COBIT 5 and enterprise governance of information technology: Building blocks and research opportunities. Journal of Information Systems, 27(1), 307-324.

Hall, J. A. (2015). Information Technology Auditing and Assurance. United States of America: Cengage Learning.

Handeri. (2014). Good IT Governance: Framework and Prototype for Higher Education. Creative Communication and Innovative Technology Journal, 3(2), 135-152.

Husein, U. (2005). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Indrajit, R. E. (2011). Teknologi Informasi dan Perguruan Tinggi: menjawab tantangan pendidikan abad ke 21. Jakarta: Creative Commons.

ISACA. (2013). COBIT 5: Process Assessment Model (PAM).

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jaab.v5i2.39703