Taat karena Membenarkan: Pembenaran Sistem Aparat Pemerintahan Desa dalam Penerimaan Kebijakan Pembangunan Bandara Internasional Yogyakarta
Abstrak
Pembangunan Bandara Internasional Yogyakarta memicu konflik pada warga yang terdampak. Meski turut terdampak oleh pembangunan, sebagian besar kepala dukuh memilih untuk menerima bandara. Penerimaan kepala dukuh terhadap pembangunan perlu diteliti untuk menyingkap dinamika pengambilan keputusan aparat pemerintahan desa dalam konflik agraria. Penelitian naratif ini mewawancarai tiga kepala dukuh yang sebagian besar warganya, termasuk diri mereka sendiri, menerima relokasi untuk pembangunan. Penelitian ini memperlihatkan bahwa ketaatan partisipan untuk menerima bandara adalah hasil dari pembenaran sistem yang melatarbelakangi pembangunan. Pembenaran sistem partisipan diwujudkan dalam tiga hal. Pertama, dalam menyikapi proses pembangunan, partisipan mempercayai wacana pemerintah, melakukan rasionalisasi, dan melempar tanggung jawab melalui dalih utilitarian, teknokratik, dan birokratik. Kedua, dalam bertindak sebagai kepala dukuh, partisipan memaknai peran mereka dengan sedemikian rupa sehingga menyokong pembangunan. Ketiga, dalam menilai hasil pembangunan, partisipan bertumpu pada sistem yang ada untuk menyikapi dampak pembangunan. Pembenaran sistem yang membawa mereka menerima pembangunan dijamin dan dibentuk oleh ketergantungan mereka terhadap pemerintah yang ditentukan oleh keamanan karir mereka. Penelitian ini memperlihatkan pentingnya status dan kepentingan material dalam pembenaran sistem yang menghasilkan ketaatan terhadap kebijakan.
Kata Kunci
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
AJI Indonesia. (2021). Data Kekerasan Tim Advokasi AJI Indonesia. Advokasi AJI Indonesia. https://advokasi.aji.or.id/read/data-kekerasan/1953.html?y=2021&m=1&ye=2021&me=9
Antoro, K. S. (2015). Analisis Kritis Substansi dan Implementasi Undang-undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2012 tentang Keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta dalam Bidang Pertanahan. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 1(1), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v1i1.38
Aronson, E. (2019). Dissonance, hypocrisy, and the self-concept. Dalam Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology, 2nd ed (hlm. 141–157). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000135-007
Asisten Perekonomian dan Pembangunan Sekretaris Daerah DIY. (2017, Maret 27). NEW YOGYAKARTA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (NYIA): “MEWUJUDKAN DIY SEBAGAI DAERAH TUJUAN WISATA DAN BUDAYA KELAS DUNIA. http://bappeda.jogjaprov.go.id/download/download/379
Brandt, M. J. (2013). Do the disadvantaged legitimize the social system? A large-scale test of the status-legitimacy hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(5), 765–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031751
Brannigan, A., & Perry, G. (2016). Milgram, Genocide and Bureaucracy: A Post-Weberian Perspective. State Crime Journal. https://doi.org/10.13169/statecrime.5.2.0287
Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Lundberg, K. B., & McKee, S. (2017). The politics of socioeconomic status: How socioeconomic status may influence political attitudes and engagement. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.018
CDC. (2020, Februari 11). Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/php/public-health-recommendations.htm
Chu, D. K., Akl, E. A., Duda, S., Solo, K., Yaacoub, S., Schünemann, H. J., Chu, D. K., Akl, E. A., El-harakeh, A., Bognanni, A., Lotfi, T., Loeb, M., Hajizadeh, A., Bak, A., Izcovich, A., Cuello-Garcia, C. A., Chen, C., Harris, D. J., Borowiack, E., … Schünemann, H. J. (2020). Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet, 395(10242), 1973–1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9
Corcoran, K. E., Pettinicchio, D., & Young, J. T. N. (2015). Perceptions of Structural Injustice and Efficacy: Participation in Low/Moderate/High-Cost Forms of Collective Action. Sociological Inquiry, 85(3), 429–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12082
Dewi, N. L. G. M. P., & Salim, M. N. (2020). Berakhir di Temon: Perdebatan Panjang Pengadaan Tanah untuk [New] Yogyakarta International Airport (YIA). STPN Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346424596_Berakhir_di_Temon_Perdebatan_Panjang_Pengadaan_Tanah_untuk_New_Yogyakarta_International_Airport_YIA
Douglas, K. R. (2016). Barriers to Social Change: Neoliberalism and the Justification of the Status-Quo among Low-Income African Americans [Thesis, University of Missouri-Kansas City]. https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/49784
Durrheim, K., Jacobs, N., & Dixon, J. (2014). Explaining the paradoxical effects of intergroup contact: Paternalistic relations and system justification in domestic labour in South Africa. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 41, 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.11.006
Edita, E. P. (2019). Aerotropolis: At what cost, to whom? An analysis of social and environmental impacts of New Yogyakarta International Airport (NYIA) project, Indonesia [Lund University]. http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8980037
Elena, N. (2020, Oktober 5). How much data does a WhatsApp call use? It depends and we explain why. MsnTechBlog. https://msntechblog.com/how-much-data-does-a-whatsapp-call-use/
Fossati, D. (2018). A Tale of Three Cities: Electoral Accountability in Indonesian Local Politics. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2017.1376345
Gibson, S., Blenkinsopp, G., Johnstone, E., & Marshall, A. (2018). Just following orders? The rhetorical invocation of ‘obedience’ in Stanley Milgram’s post-experiment interviews. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(5), 585–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2351
Godfrey, E. B., & Wolf, S. (2016). Developing critical consciousness or justifying the system? A qualitative analysis of attributions for poverty and wealth among low-income racial/ethnic minority and immigrant women. Cultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology, 22(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000048
Habibi, M., & Juliawan, B. H. (2018). Creating Surplus Labour: Neo-Liberal Transformations and the Development of Relative Surplus Population in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48(4), 649–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2018.1429007
Hadiz, V. (2022). Lokalisasi Kekuasaan di Indonesia Pascaotoritarianisme. Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Haekal, L. (2020). Ekspansi Geografis dan Perampasan Lahan: Sisi Lain Pembangunan Yogyakarta International Airport. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 11(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.11.1.2020.31-52
Harkin, D. (2015). Police legitimacy, ideology and qualitative methods: A critique of procedural justice theory. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 15(5), 594–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895815580397
Haryanto, H. C., Rahmania, T., Mubarok, A. R., Dopo, A. B., Fauzi, H., & Fajri, E. (2015). Bagaimanakah Persepsi Keterpercayaan Masyarakat terhadap Elit Politik? Jurnal Psikologi, 42(3), Art. 3. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.9913
Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Birney, M. E. (2014). Nothing by Mere Authority: Evidence that in an Experimental Analogue of the Milgram Paradigm Participants are Motivated not by Orders but by Appeals to Science. Journal of Social Issues, 70(3), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12072
Hiles, D., Čermák, I., & Chrz, V. (2017). Narrative Inquiry. Dalam C. Willig & W. S. Rogers (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology (2nd ed., hlm. 157–175). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555
Hooghe, M., & Marien, S. (2013). A Comparative Analysis of the Relation Between Political Trust and Forms of Political Participation in Europe. European Societies, 15(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2012.692807
Howitt, D. (2016). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods in Psychology (3 ed.). Pearson Education. http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=6cdcd27abbbcec24300e628e029ac13f
IBM. (2021, November 3). UTFs. IBM Documentation. https://prod.ibmdocs-production-dal-6099123ce774e592a519d7c33db8265e-0000.us-south.containers.appdomain.cloud/docs/en/db2-for-zos/11?topic=unicode-utfs
Jost, J. T. (2017). Working class conservatism: A system justification perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.020
Jost, J. T. (2019). A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(2), 263–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12297
Kamim, A. B. M. (2021). Hegemoni dan Ekonomi Politik Dana Keistimewaan di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta [Hegemony and Political Economy of Privileged Fund in Special Region of Yogyakarta]. Jurnal Politica Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri dan Hubungan Internasional, 12(2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.22212/jp.v12i2.2483
Kosonen, P., Ikonen, M., & Savolainen, T. (2022). The shaking nest of trust: A case study of funding reform in a higher education organization. Journal of Trust Research, 12(1), 43–65. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2022.2085733
Lerman, A. E., & McCabe, K. T. (2017). Personal Experience and Public Opinion: A Theory and Test of Conditional Policy Feedback. The Journal of Politics, 79(2), 624–641. https://doi.org/10.1086/689286
Li, W., Yang, Y., Wu, J., & Kou, Y. (2020). Testing the Status-Legitimacy Hypothesis in China: Objective and Subjective Socioeconomic Status Divergently Predict System Justification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(7), 1044–1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219893997
Lu, J., Gu, J., Li, K., Xu, C., Su, W., Lai, Z., Zhou, D., Yu, C., Xu, B., & Yang, Z. (2020). COVID-19 Outbreak Associated with Air Conditioning in Restaurant, Guangzhou, China, 2020. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 26(7), 1628–1631. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2607.200764
Luthfi, A. N. (2019). Perubahan Politik Agraria di Yogyakarta: Dari Reforma Agraria ke Kontra Reforma. Dalam M. Shohibuddin & A. D. Bahri (Ed.), Perjuangan Keadilan Agraria (hlm. 73–90). Sajogyo Institute, AKATIGA, Bina Desa, PSA IPB, STPN Press. https://www.academia.edu/45592913/Luthfi_2019_Perubahan_Politik_Agraria_di_Yogyakarta_Dari_Reforma_Agraria_ke_Kontra_Reforma
Ma, B., Liu, S., Liu, D., & Wang, H. (2016). Job security and work performance in Chinese employees: The mediating role of organisational identification. International Journal of Psychology, 51(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12137
Maitner, A. T. (2023). Perceptions and explanations of status in the United Arab Emirates: The role of ascribed and achieved characteristics. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 26(1), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211042421
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Meyer, M. (2021). Putting the onus on authority: A review of obedient behavior and why we should move on. New Ideas in Psychology, 60, 100831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100831
Milfont, T. L., Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2022). Socio-political efficacy explains increase in New Zealanders’ pro-environmental attitudes due to COVID-19. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, 101751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101751
Nam, H. H., Jost, J. T., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2013). “Not for All the Tea in China!” Political Ideology and the Avoidance of Dissonance-Arousing Situations. PLOS ONE, 8(4), e59837. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059837
Neal, T. M. S., Shockley, E., & Schilke, O. (2016). The “Dark Side” of Institutional Trust. Dalam E. Shockley, T. M. S. Neal, L. M. PytlikZillig, & B. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Trust: Towards Theoretical and Methodological Integration (hlm. 177–191). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22261-5_10
Ngusmanto, N. (2016). Pilkada 2015 and Patronage Practice among Bureaucrat in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Asian Social Science, 12(9), Art. 9. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v12n9p236
Paripurno, E. T., Nugroho, A. R. B., & Nugroho, N. (2015). Kajian Peningkatan Risiko Bencana Tsunami di Pantai Selatan Kulon Progo—Yogyakarta. Proseding Simposium Nasional Mitigasi Bencana Tsunami. https://www.academia.edu/23716719/Kajian_Peningkatan_Risiko_Bencana_Tsunami_di_Pantai_Selatan_Kulon_Progo_Yogyakarta
Rachman, N. F., & Yanuardy, D. (2015). Dapatkah Indonesia Bebas dari Kutukan Kolonial? Refleksi Kritis atas MP3EI. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Mamangan, 3(2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.22202/mamangan.v3i2.94
Russo, S., & Mosso, C. O. (2019). Infrahumanization and Socio-Structural Variables: The Role of Legitimacy, Ingroup Identification, and System Justification Beliefs. Social Justice Research, 32(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-018-0321-x
Scott, J. (2015). Technocracy. Dalam A Dictionary of Sociology (4th ed., hlm. 1034). Oxford University Press.
Sutama, Anif, S., Prayitno, H. J., Narimo, S., Fuadi, D., Sari, D. P., & Adnan, M. (2021). Metacognition of Junior High School Students in Mathematics Problem Solving Based on Cognitive Style. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(1), 134–144.
Takashi, S. (2014). Indonesian Technocracy in Transition: A Preliminary Analysis The Politics of Technocracy in Southeast Asia. Southeast Asian Studies, 3(2), 255–281. https://doi.org/10.20495/seas.3.2_255
Telkomsel. (t.t.). Tariff. Telkomsel. Diambil 24 Oktober 2022, dari http://www.telkomsel.com/en/tariff
Vainio, A., Mäkiniemi, J.-P., & Paloniemi, R. (2014). System justification and the perception of food risks. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213503502
Valdes, E. A., Liu, J. H., & Williams, M. (2022). Testing the status-legitimacy hypothesis: Predicting system justification using objective and subjective socioeconomic status in China and the United States. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12555
van der Toorn, J., Feinberg, M., Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C., Tyler, T. R., Willer, R., & Wilmuth, C. (2015). A Sense of Powerlessness Fosters System Justification: Implications for the Legitimation of Authority, Hierarchy, and Government. Political Psychology, 36(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12183
van der Toorn, J., Tyler, T. R., & Jost, J. T. (2011). More than fair: Outcome dependence, system justification, and the perceived legitimacy of authority figures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.003
Vargas-Salfate, S., Paez, D., Liu, J. H., Pratto, F., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2018). A Comparison of Social Dominance Theory and System Justification: The Role of Social Status in 19 Nations. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(7), 1060–1076. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218757455
Vasilopoulos, P., & Brouard, S. (2020). System Justification and Affective Responses to Terrorism: Evidence from the November 2015 Paris Attacks. Political Psychology, 41(3), 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12639
Weber, M. (2015). Bureaucracy. Dalam T. Waters & D. Waters (Ed.), Weber’s Rationalism and Modern Society: New Translations on Politics, Bureaucracy, and Social Stratification (hlm. 73–132). Palgrave Macmillan US. http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=789a5f63ba45579a2b518d64c91a720c
Weeden, J., & Kurzban, R. (2017). Self-Interest Is Often a Major Determinant of Issue Attitudes. Political Psychology, 38(S1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12392
WhatsApp. (t.t.). About sending messages on WhatsApp | WhatsApp Help Center. Diambil 24 Oktober 2022, dari https://faq.whatsapp.com/2442183386005270/?locale=en_US
Wilkinson‐Ryan, T. (2020). Justifying Bad Deals (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 3532442). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3532442
Zeng, R., Chen, Y., & Li, H. (2018). Participation in collective action in China: Unfair experience, interests involved, and political efficacy. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 46(9), 1561–1572. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7117
Zhang, S., & Zhou, J. (2018). Social Justice and Public Cooperation Intention: Mediating Role of Political Trust and Moderating Effect of Outcome Dependence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01381
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jpsp.v7i3.46216
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-sa4.footer##
Jurnal ini terideks di:
