Effect of chemical and mechanical weed control on weed seed banks in rice field

Uum Umiyati, Dedi Widayat, Yani Maharani

Abstract


Weed control is essential for ensuring the diversity of weeds on agricultural land. A study was conducted in rice fields in Subang and Cianjur districts, where 24 fields were observed to have varying weed management approaches. The research employed descriptive methods, including surveys to identify weed types and destructive methods to analyze weed seed banks at different depths. The descriptive methods included surveys to identify weed types and destructive methods to analyze weed seed banks at different depths. Each district contained twelve rice fields that reflected diverse environmental conditions and weed control techniques, yet shared a similar age range of 1-5 weeks. The study examined the weed vegetation, community coefficients, weed diversity, weed dominance, and variations in seed banks at various depths. The results indicated that fields without herbicide-based weed control had a higher number of weed species than those using herbicides. Herbicide use effectively decreased weed populations, subsequently altering the seed bank composition. The dominant weeds in herbicide-treated fields were Cynodon dactylon, Pistia stratiotes, and Ludwigia adscendens, whereas Ludwigia adscendens, Cynodon dactylon, and Pistia stratiotes were dominant in fields without herbicides.

Keywords


vegetation; seedbank; diversity; population; weed control.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bagavathiannan MV, Davis AS. 2018. An ecological perspective on managing weeds during the great selection for herbicide resistance. Pest. Manag. Sci. 74: 2277–2286

Caroca RP, Candia PS, Hinojosa EA. 2011. Characterization of the weed seed bank in zero and conventional tillage in central Chile.conventional tillage in Central Chile. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 71(1): 140-147.

Everaarts AP. 1992. Response of weeds to the method of fertilizer application on low‐fertility acid soils in Suriname. Weed Research, 32(5): 391-397.

Putra FP, Yudono P, Waluyo DS. 2018. Changes in Weed Composition in the Intercropping System of Upland Rice with Soybean on Beach Sand Land. Journal of Indonesian Agronomy, 46(1): 33-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.24831/jai.v46i1.17093.

Huang S, Pan X, Sun Y, Zhang Y, Hang X, Yu X, Zhang W. 2013. Effects of long‐term fertilization on the weed growth and community composition in a double‐rice ecosystem during the fallow period. Weed Biology and Management, 13(1): 10-18.

Jiang M, Shen XP, Gao W, Shen MX, Dai QG. 2014. Weed seed-bank responses to long-term fertilization in a rice-wheat rotation system. Plant, Soil and Environment, 60(8): 344-350.

Khan AM, Hussain Z, Khan I, Khan R, Waqas M, Haroon M, Khan IA. 2012. Studies on weed seed bank of new developmental farm, KPK Agricultural University Peshawar, Pakistan. Pakistan journal of weed science Research, 18(2).

Lal B, Gautam P, Raja R, Tripathi R, Shahid M, Mohanty S, Nayak AK. 2016. Weed seed bank diversity and community shift in a four-decade-old fertilization experiment in rice–rice system. Ecological Engineering, 86: 135-145.

Ma M, Dalling JW, Ma Z, Zhou X. 2017. Soil environmental factors drive seed density across vegetation types on the Tibetan Plateau. Plant and Soil, 419: 349-361.

Melander B, Munier-Jolain N, Charles R, Wirth J, Schwarz J, Van Der Weide R, Kudsk P. 2013. European perspectives on the adoption of nonchemical weed management in reduced-tillage systems for arable crops. Weed Technology, 27(1): 231-240.

Mohler CL, Te Asdale JR. 1993. Response of weed emergence to rate of Vicia villosa Roth and Secale cereale L. residue. Weed Research, 33(6): 487-499.

Norsworthy JK, Korres NE, Walsh MJ, Powles SB. 2016. Integrating herbicide programs with harvest weed seed control and other fall management practices for the control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Sci., 64: 540–550.

Norsworthy JK, Korres NE, Bagavathiannan MV. 2018.Weed Seedbank management: Revisiting how herbicides are evaluated. Weed Sci., 66: 415–417.

Rahmadi R, Rochman F. 2020. Herbicide Efficacy of Isopropylamine Glyphosate 480 SL on Rubber Plantation Weeds (Hevea brasiliensis [Muell.] Arg.). Agrorektan Journal, 7(1).

Schutte GC, Mansfield RI, Smith H, Beeton KV. 2003. Application of azoxystrobin for control of benomyl-resistant Guignardia citricarpa on ‘Valencia’oranges in South Africa. Plant Disease, 87(7): 784-788.

Rachma N, Umam AS. 2021. Organic farming as a sustainable agricultural solution in the New Normal Era. Journal of Community Empowerment Learning (JP2M), 1(4): 328-338.

Schwartz LM, Gibson DJ, Gage KL, Matthews JL, Jordan DL, Owen MDK, Shaw DR, Weller SC, Wilson RG, Young BG. 2015. Seedbank and field emergence of weeds in glyphosate-resistant cropping systems in the United States. Weed Sci., 63: 425–439

Sitaramaraju S, Prasad, NVSD, Chenga RV, Narayana E. 2014. Impact of pesticides used for crop production on the environment, Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences JCHPS Special, 3: 75-79.

Tjitrosoedirjo SH, Utomo, Wiriatmojo J. 1984. Pengelolaan Gulma di Perkebunan. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Van Bruggen AHC, Finckh MR, He M, Ritsema CJ, Harkes P, Knut D, Geissen V. 2021. Indirect effects of the herbicide glyphosate on plant, animal and human health through its effects on microbial communities. Front. Environ. Sci., 18: 763917. Sec. Toxicology, Pollution and the Environment Volume 9 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.763917

Wan K, Tao Y, Li R, Pan J, Tang L, Chen F. 2012. Influences of long‐term different types of fertilization on weed community biodiversity in rice paddy fields. Weed biology and management, 12(1): 12-21.

Wanger TC, DeClerck F, Garibaldi LA, Ghazoul J, Kleijn D, Klein AM, Kremen C, Mooney H, Perfecto I, Powell LL, Settele J, Sole M, Tscharntke, Weisser W. 2020. Integrating agroecological production in a robust post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. Nat. Ecol. Evol., 4: 1150–1152.

Zarwazi LM, Chozin MA, Guntoro D. 2016. Potential weed interference in three rice paddy cultivation systems. Indonesian Journal of Agronomy, 44(2): 147-15.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/kultivasi.v23i2.53673

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kultivasi Indexed by:

       width=    

 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View Jurnal Kultivasi Stat