Message fatigue on social media and Covid-19 health behavior intention

Nia Ashton Destrity, Nilam Wardasari

Abstract


Continuous health messages regarding Covid-19 are disseminated via social media platforms, covering essential health protocols such as mask-wearing, hand hygiene, physical distancing, crowd avoidance, limited mobility, and social interactions. These messages aim to encourage the adoption of health behaviors among the public. However, the persistent exposure to these messages can lead to message fatigue, potentially causing resistance to health recommendations. Despite numerous studies on message fatigue, none specifically address its occurrence in Covid-19 health messages on social media and its mediation by attitudes toward messages. Moreover, given Indonesia’s collectivist cultural inclination, responses to Covid-19 health messages, may vary. Through an online survey, this study collected quantitative data to explain the level of message fatigue experienced by social media users and the mediating role of attitudes toward messages in contributing to intention in health behaviors related to Covid-19. Meanwhile, qualitative data were used to identify message characteristics that cause and mitigate fatigue for social media users. Findings from 204 respondents reveal that a majority experience moderate levels of message fatigue concerning Covid-19 health messages on social media. Message fatigue plays a role in attitudes toward messages and intentions regarding Covid-19 health behaviors, with attitudes toward messages serving as a mediator between message fatigue and behavioral intention. The study underscores the theoretical and practical implications for addressing message fatigue in health communication campaigns, offering insights into effective strategies for mitigating its impact.


Keywords


Message fatigue; attitudes toward messages; health behavioral intention; Covid-19; social media

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmed, S. K. (2024). How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research: A simplified guide for researchers. Oral Oncology Reports, 12(September), 100662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662

Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology and Health, 26(9), 1113–1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.613995

Alwi, I. (2015). Kriteria Empirik Dalam Menentukan Ukuran Sampel. Jurnal Formatif, 2(2), 140–148.

Ball, H., & Wozniak, T. R. (2021). Why Do Some Americans Resist COVID-19 Prevention Behavior? An Analysis of Issue Importance, Message Fatigue, and Reactance Regarding COVID-19 Messaging. Health Communication, 00(00), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1920717

Baseman, J. G., Revere, D., Painter, I., Toyoji, M., Thiede, H., & Duchin, J. (2013). Public health communications and alert fatigue. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-295

Bostrom, R. (2009). Realism and the Received View. In S. W. Littlejohn & K. A. Foss (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Communication Theory. Sage.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, C. for D. C. and P. (2021). Scientific Brief: SARS-CoV-2 Transmission. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/sars-cov-2-transmission.html

Cho, H., & Choi, J. (2010). Predictors and the role of attitude toward the message and perceived message quality in gain- and loss-frame antidrug persuasion of adolescents. Health Communication, 25(4), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410231003773326

Covid19.go.id. (2022). Beranda. Covid19.Go.Id. https://covid19.go.id/

Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815

Forestier, C., Sarrazin, P., Sniehotta, F., Allenet, B., Heuzé, J. P., Gauchet, A., & Chalabaev, A. (2020). Do compensatory health beliefs predict behavioural intention in a multiple health behaviour change context? Evidence in individuals with cardiovascular diseases? Psychology, Health and Medicine, 25(5), 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2019.1653476

Guan, M., Li, Y., Scoles, J. D., & Zhu, Y. (2022). COVID-19 Message Fatigue: How Does It Predict Preventive Behavioral Intentions and What Types of Information are People Tired of Hearing About? Health Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.2023385

Katadata.co.id. (2022). Kembali Naik, Kasus Covid-19 Indonesia Peringkat 4 di Asia (Kamis, 13 Januari 2022). Katadata.Co.Id. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/01/13/kembali-naik-kasus-covid-19-indonesia-peringkat-4-di-asia-kamis-13-januari-2022

Kim, M. Y., & Han, K. (2022). Social Motivation to Comply with COVID-19 Guidelines in Daily Life in South Korea and the United States. Behavioral Sciences, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12070213

Kim, S., & So, J. (2017). How Message Fatigue toward Health Messages Leads to Ineffective Persuasive Outcomes: Examining the Mediating Roles of Reactance and Inattention. Journal of Health Communication, 00(00), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1414900

Koh, P. K. K., Chan, L. L., & Tan, E. K. (2020). Messaging Fatigue and Desensitisation to Information During Pandemic. Archives of Medical Research, 51(7), 716–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.06.014

MacIntyre, C. R., Nguyen, P. Y., Chughtai, A. A., Trent, M., Gerber, B., Steinhofel, K., & Seale, H. (2021). Mask use, risk-mitigation behaviours and pandemic fatigue during the COVID-19 pandemic in five cities in Australia, the UK and USA: A cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 106(June 2020), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.056

Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude? Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 318. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150973

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211488

Pope, N. K. L., Voges, K. E., & Brown, M. R. (2004). The effect of provocation in the form of mild erotica on attitude to the ad and corporate image. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2004.10639154

Reinhard, M. A., Schindler, S., Raabe, V., Stahlberg, D., & Messner, M. (2014). Less is sometimes more: How repetition of an antismoking advertisement affects attitudes toward smoking and source credibility. In Social Influence (Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 116–132). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2013.790839

Reynolds-Tylus, T., Lukacena, K. M., & Truban, O. (2020). Message Fatigue to Bystander Intervention Messages: Examining Pathways of Resistance among College Men. Health Communication, 00(00), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1794551

Richardson, J. G., Trafimow, D., & Madson, L. (2012). Future health-related behavioral intention formation: The role of affect and cognition. Journal of Social Psychology, 152(6), 775–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2012.693973

So, J. (2022). Counterproductive Effects of Overfamiliar Antitobacco Messages on Smoking Cessation Intentions via Message Fatigue and Resistance to Persuasion. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 36(8), 931–941. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000776

So, J., & Alam, N. (2018). Predictors and Effects of Anti-Obesity Message Fatigue: A Thought-Listing Analysis. Health Communication, 00(00), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1434736

So, J., Kim, S., & Cohen, H. (2016). Message fatigue: Conceptual definition, operationalization, and correlates. Communication Monographs, 00(00), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2016.1250429

World Health Organization, W. H. O. (2020). Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: Implications for infection prevention precautions. https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/transmission-of-sars-cov-2-implications-for-infection-prevention-precautions

Yan, J., Wei, J., Zhao, D., Vinnikova, A., Li, L., & Wang, S. (2018). Communicating Online Diet-Nutrition Information and Influencing Health Behavioral Intention: The Role of Risk Perceptions, Problem Recognition, and Situational Motivation. Journal of Health Communication, 23(7), 624–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1500657




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jmk.v9i2.52231

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Manajemen Komunikasi Indexed by:

  

Jurnal Manajemen Komunikasi

Fakultas Ilmu KomunikasiUniversitas Padjadjaran

Postgraduate Building, 2nd Floor, Faculty of Communication Sciences, Padjadjaran University

Jl. Ir. Soekarno Km. 21, Jatinangor, West Java 45363, Indonesia

Phone: +6287718604022 (Risa Nurisani)

Fax: +62227794122

Email: jurnalmankomunpad@gmail.com


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Jurnal Manajemen Komunikasi Supervised by:

 


View My Stats