Pengaruh Partai Sayap Kanan dalam Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Muslim Ban: Studi Komparasi Amerika Serikat, Australia, India, dan Denmark Periode 2017-2021

Marsaa Anindita, Adhi Cahya Fahadayna

Abstrak


Penelitian ini membahas pengaruh Partai Sayap Kanan terhadap kebijakan "Muslim Ban" di AS, Australia, India, dan Denmark, dengan fokus pada persepsi negatif terhadap Islam pasca 9/11. Menggunakan konsep Populisme dan Kebijakan Luar Negeri serta metode komparatif dan analisis regresi linear berganda, penelitian ini mengkaji faktor-faktor seperti persepsi ancaman terhadap Islam, trauma nasional, arus imigrasi, dan pengaruh AS. Hasilya menunjukkan semua variabel Partai Sayap Kanan signifikan di AS, dengan Klaim Pemimpin Mewakili Rakyat sebagai faktor utama. Di Australia, hanya Penggunaan Isu Populis yang mendekati signifikan, sementara di India dan Denmark tidak ditemukan pengaruh signifikan. Temuan ini menyoroti perbedaan dalam penerapan kebijakan dan implikasinya bagi demokrasi dan komunitas Muslim di negara-negara tersebut.

 

This study examines the influence of Right-Wing Parties on the implementation of the "Muslim Ban" policy in the United States, Australia, India, and Denmark, focusing on negative perceptions of Islam post-9/11. Using the concepts of Populism and Foreign Policy, along with comparative methods and multiple linear regression analysis, the research investigates factors such as public perceptions of Islam as a threat, national trauma, international immigration flows, and U.S. policy influence. The findings reveal that all Right-Wing Party variables significantly affect the Muslim Ban policy in the U.S., with the Claim of Leaders Representing the People being the most influential factor. In Australia, only the Use of Populist Issues shows near-significant influence, while in India and Denmark, no significant impact is observed. These findings highlight the complexity and variations in policy implementation and their implications for democracy and the treatment of Muslim communities across these nations.


Kata Kunci


Amerika Serikat, Australia, Denmark, India, Muslim Ban

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


A, L. (1956). Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. The American Political Science Review, 662-693.

Anditya, N. R. (2019). Populisme Sayap Kanan di Negara-Negara Demokratis: Kembalinya Yang-Politis. Institute Of International Studies.

Australian Government-Department of Home Affairs. (2020). Australia’s offshore processing policy.

BBC. (2019, December 17). BBC. Retrieved from BBC Web Site: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42379985.

BBC News. (2019, December 10). Citizenship Amendment Bill: India's new 'anti-Muslim' law explained. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-50670393.

Cas Mudde. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. European Journal of Political Research, 39(6), 541- 563.

Cas, M., & Cristobal, K. (2017). Populism : A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

Erbas, I. (2022). Constructivist Approach in Foreign Policy and in International Relations. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(3), 5087–5096.

Goodwin, M., & Eatwell, R. (2018). National populism: The revolt against liberal democracy. Penguin Random House.

Henley, J. (2002, April 22). The Guardian. Retrieved from The Guardian Web Site: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/apr/22/thefarright.france.

Hawly, G. (2019, July 24). Ambivalent nativism: Trump supporters’ attitudes toward Islam and Muslim immigration. Brookings Edu. Site: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/ambivalent-nativism-trump-supporters-attitudes-toward-islam-and-muslim-immigration/

Iskandar, R., Ambarwati, & Putra, M. I. T. (2022). Analisis Strategi Kebijakan Luar Negeri Indonesia dalam Belt and Road Initiative. Jurnal Dinamika Global, 7(1), 1-25

Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press.

Mukaromah, Z., Muzani, & Zid, M. (2022). Kebijakan Pemerintah Amerika Serikat terhadap Migran (Muslim). Jurnal Mercatoria, 15(2), 73-84

Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.

Overseas Development Institute. (2023, January 18). The rise of the far right in Denmark and Sweden and why it’s vital to change the narrative on immigration. ODI.

Our World In Data. (2024, May 22). Our World In Data. Retrieved from Our World In Data Web Site: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/democracy-index-eiu?tab=chart&time=2017..2021&region=Europe&country=USA~AUS~IND~DNK.

Puspaningrum, B. A. (2021, November 10). Kompas. Retrieved from Internasional Kompas Website: https://www.setneg.go.id/baca/index/paparkan_tantangan_global_umat_islam_dewasa_ini.

Ray, M. (2024, 5 3). Britannica. Retrieved from Britannica Web Site: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Party-for-Freedom.

Sakinah, K. (2020, December 15). Republika. Retrieved from Republika Khazanah Web Site: https://khazanah.republika.co.id/berita/qld9yu366/denmark-akan-pisahkan-klasifikasi-imigran-muslim.

Sebayang, R. (2019, December 15). CNBC Indonesia. Retrieved from CNBC Indonesia Web Site: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20191215141520-4-123217/india-rusuh-geger-gegara-uu-anti-muslim-ini-isinya.

TribunNews. (2019, September 18). Tribun. Retrieved from Tribunnews web site: https://www.tribunnews.com/australia-plus/2016/09/18/pelarangan-imigran-dari-negara-ekstrimis-ke-australia.

Velasco A. (2020). Populism and Identity Politics. LSE Public Policy Review. 1(1), 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31389/lseppr.1




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/padjir.v7i1.58347

Padjadjaran Journal of International Relations Terindeks Di:

 Google Scholar   Indonesia One SearchWorldCat Crossref  Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)