Comparison of the retentive ability on incisal bite force between aloe vera and poly(methyl-vinyl-ether) adhesive materials in complete acrylic denture measured by modified pressure transducer

Marisa Julinda; Taufik Sumarsongko; Gian Nur Alamsyah; Aprillia Adenan

doi:10.24198/pjd.vol33no1.23907

Comparison of the retentive ability on incisal bite force between aloe vera and poly(methyl-vinyl-ether) adhesive materials in complete acrylic denture measured by modified pressure transducer

Marisa Julinda, Taufik Sumarsongko, Gian Nur Alamsyah, Aprillia Adenan

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with acrylic complete denture, usually have a confidence issue in using their complete dentures to chew and speak, because of concern about detached of the denture from its place and pain on the alveolar ridge. Application denture adhesive material ordinarily can solve the problem. Mostly, denture adhesives in the market are made from synthetic material poly(methyl-vinyl-ether) but nowadays aloe vera extract is believed to be a substitute to synthetic denture adhesive material. The purpose of this study was to analyzed of comparison the retentive ability on incisal bite forces between aloe vera extract and poly(methyl-vinyl-ether) adhesive in complete acrylic denture ameasured by modified pressure tranducer. Methods: This true-experimental research used 10 samples from patients who used acrylic complete denture and meet suitable criteria. Samples were tested in three different interventions, the first one applied by denture adhesive made from poly(methyl-vinyl-ether), the second one applied by denture adhesive made from aloe vera extract and the third one as a control group, sample was tested without any application of denture adhesive. Retentive ability on incisal bite forces was measured by modified pressure transducer with integrated software. Data was analysis using ANOVA method. Results: Anterior bite force as control 20,98 N, aloe vera 23,42 N, poly (methyl-vinyl-ether) 21,25 N and without denture adhesive as control. Significant differences in the incisal bite force dislodgement of dentures that were applied with Aloe vera-based denture adhesive s with p-value of 0.0088. Conclusion: Denture adhesive made from Aloe vera extract had the highest adhesiveness incisal bite force value compared to denture adhesive made from poly(methyl-vinyl-ether) and without denture adhesive.

Keywords

retentive ability; incisal bite force; aloe vera; poly(methyl-vinyl-ether); pressure transducer

Full Text:

PDF

References

Carlo S Di, Angelis F De, Brauner E, Rosella D, Papi P, Pompa G, et al. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluation of mandibular bone tissue regeneration. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2018;32:1–8. DOI: 10.1177/2058738418798249

Villar CC, Huynh-ba GUY, Mills MP, Cochran DL. Wound healing around dental implants. Endodontic Topics. 2012;25:44–62. DOI: 10.1111/etp.12018.

Colombo JS, Satoshi S, Okazaki J, Crean S, Sloan AJ, Waddington RJ. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets. J Dent. 2012;40(4):338–46.

Almola BH, Al-ghaban N, Taher A. Deposition at amelogenin coated Ti implant surface. Smile Dent.J. 2016;9(1):12-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.010

Saini M, Singh Y,Arora P, Arora V JK. Implant biomaterial: A comprehensive review. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3(1):52–7.DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.52

Shi J, Li Y, Gu Y, Qiao S, Zhang X, Lai H. Effect of titanium implants with strontium incorporation on bone apposition in animal models : A systematic review and meta- analysis. Scientific Reports. 2017; (11):1–10. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15488-1

Apratim A, Eachempati P, Salian KKK, Singh V, Chhabra S, Shah S. Zirconia in dental implantology: A review. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5(3):147-56.DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2019-172

Chun KJ, Lee JY. Comparative study of mechanical properties of dental restorative materials and dental hard tissues in compressive loads. J. Dent. Biomech. 2014;(5):1–6. DOI: 10.1177/1758736014555246

Cui WF, Liu N, Qin GW. Microstructures, mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of the Zr e x Ti ( Ag ) alloys for dental implant application. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016; 6(8): 2569-2612 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.01.030.

Zhang BG, Myers DE, Wallace GG, Brandt M, Choong PF. Bioactive coatings for orthopaedic implants-recent trends in development of implant coatings. Int J Mol Sci. 2014; 15(7): 11878-921. DOI: 10.3390/ijms150711878.

Catauro M, Bollino F, Papale F, Lamanna G. Investigation of the sample preparation and curing treatment effects on mechanical properties and bioactivity of silica rich metakaolin geopolymer. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014; 36: 20-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.11.026

Sauffi AS, Ibrahim WMW, Mustafa M, Abdulla MMAB, Ahmad R, Zaidi FA,et al. A review of carbonate minerals as an additive to geopolymer materials. Mater Sci Eng. 2019; 551:1-5. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/551/1/012084

Chen L, Wang Z, Wang Y, Feng J. Preparation and Properties of Alkali Activated Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer. Materials (Basel). 2016; 9(9): 767. DOI: 10.3390/ma9090767.

Rovnanik P. Effect of curing temperature on the development of hard structure of metakaolin- based geopolymer. Constr Build Mater. 2014; 24(7): 1176–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.11.048

Herwani, Pane I, Imran I, Budiono B. Compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with a variable of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution molarity. MATEC Web Conf. 2018; 147:1-5. DOI: 10.1002/fam.2240

Blaszczynski TZ, Krol MR. Alkaline activator impact on the geopolymer binders. Mater Sci Eng. 2017; 245: 1–11.DOI: 10.1007/s43207-020-00060-x

Tippayasam C, Sutikulsombat S, Kamseu E, Rosa R, Thavorniti P, Chindaprasirt P, Leonelli C, Hennes G, Chaysuwan D. In vitro surface reaction in SBF of a non-crystalline aluminosilicate (geopolymer) material. Aust Ceram Soc. 2018;(6):1–7. DOI: 10.1007/s41779-018-0205-4

Catauro M, Bollino F, Kansal I, Kamseu E, Lancellotti I, Leonelli C. Mechanical and biological characterization of geopolymers for potential application as biomaterials. Azo J Mater. 2012; (5):1–15. DOI : 10.2240/azojomo0322

Eliaz N, Metoki N. Calcium phosphate bioceramics : A review of their history, structure, properties, coating technologies and biomedical applications. Materials. 2017; (3):1-104. DOI: 10.3390/ma10040334

Barradas AMC, Fernandes HAM, Groen N, Chai YC, Schrooten J, Peppel JVD, et al. A calcium-induced signaling cascade leading to osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Biomaterials. 2012; 33(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.020

Park JH, Lee EJ, Knowles JC, Kim HW (2014). Preparation of in situ hardening composite microcarriers: calcium phosphate cement combined with alginate for bone regeneration. J Biomater Appl.2014;28(7):1079-1084. DOI: 10.1177/0885328213496486

Marsell R, Einhorn TA, The biology of fracture healing,. NIH Public Access. 2012; 42(6): 551–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.031.

Terheyden H, Lang NP. Bierbaum S, Stadlinger B. Osseointegration – communication of cells. Clin Oral Impl Res.2011; 23: 1127–35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02327.x

Loi F, Córdova LA, Pajarinen J, Lin T, Yao Z, Goodman SB. Inflammation, fracture and bone repair.Bone.2016; 86(3): 119–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.02.020

Ghiasi MS, Chen J, Vaziri A, Rodriguez EK, Nazarian A. Bone fracture healing in mechanobiological modeling : A review of principles and methods. Bone Reports. 2017; 6(3): 87–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2017.03.002

Kjeldsen J, Smedskjaer MM,Mauro JC, Youngman RE, Huang L, Yue Y. mixed alkaline earth effect in sodium aluminosilicate glasses.J Non-Cryst Solids.2013; 369(6): 61-68. DOI: 10.1063/1.4863998

Marrelli M, Maletta C, Inchingolo F, Alfano M, Tatullo M. Three point bending test of zirconia core/veneer ceramics for dental restoration. Int J Dent. 2013; (2): 1-5. DOI: 10.1155/2013/831976

Hoffmann O, Angelov N, Zafiropoulos GG, Andreana S. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27(2): 352-8.

Chun K, Choi H, Lee J. Comparison of mechanical property and role between enamel and dentin in the human teeth. J Dent Biomech. 2014; 6(5): 1758736014520809.

DOI: 10.1177/1758736014520809.

Kanasan N, Adzila S, Rahman HA, Bano N, Panerselvan G, Hidayati NA. FTIR and XRD evaluation of magnesium doped hydroxyapatite / sodium alginate powder by precipitation method. Key Eng Mater. 2018; 791: 45–9. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.791.45

Chug A, Shukla S, Mahesh L, Jadwani S. Osseointegration-molecular events at the bone-implant interface: A review. J Oral Maxillofac Surgery Med Pathol. 2013; 25(2): 1–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoms.2012.01.008

Shapiro F, Wu JY. Woven bone overview : Structural classification based on its integral role in developmental, repair and pathological bone formation throughout vertebrate groups. Eur Cells Mater. 2019; 38: 137–67. DOI: 10.22203/eCM.v038a11.

Bose S, Fielding G, Tarafder S, Bandyopadhyay A. Understanding of dopant-induced osteogenesis and angiogenesis in calcium phosphate ceramics. Trends Biotechnol. 2013; 31(10): 594-605. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.06.005.

Muddugangadhar BC, Amarnath GS, Tripathi S, Dikshit S, Divya MS. Biomaterials for dental implants: An overview. J. Clin.Oral Implants Res.2011; 2(1): 13-24. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10012-1030

Ramazanoglu M, Oshida Y. Osseointegration and bioscience of implant surface-current con-cepts at bone-implant interface. In: Implant Dentistry - A Rapidly Evolving Practice p. 57–82. [cited 2020 July 20] Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/implant-dentistry-a-rapidly-evolving-practice/osseointegration-and-bioscience-of-implant-surface-current-at-bone-implant-interface

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjd.vol33no1.23907