DMF-T index and performed treatment index of patients in Conservative Dentistry Installation

Muhammad Adri Nurrahim, Endang Sukartini, Ayu Trisna Hayati

Abstract


Introduction: DMF-T index is an important indicator to assess oral health status of the population. DMF-T index is a number that indicates the average total number of permanent teeth affected by caries, missing or should be extraction because of caries, or have been restorated on each tooth and not each surface. DMF-T index being a reference of the Performed Treatment Index (PTI) which is the sum percentage of restored teeth or without caries in the population. The purpose of this study is to determine DMF-T index and performed treatment index of the patient in Dental Conservation Installation.Methods: This research used the descriptive with survey techniques. Sampling was conducted with a total sampling. The DMF-T index and PTI of Patients in Dental Conservative Installation on July – September 2011. The data obtained through clinical examination of 561 respondents. Results: The DMF-T index patients in Dental Conservative Installation is 5.824 while the PTI is 1.51%. Conclusion: DMF-T index of patients in Dental Conservative Installation period July - September 2011 in the high category and PTI Patients In Dental Conservative Installation Oral and Dental Hospital Faculty of Dentistry Universitas Padjadjaran period July - September 2011 in the low category.


Keywords


Caries, DMF-T Index, PTI, Performance Treatment Index.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Pintauli S, Hamada T. Menuju gigi & mulut sehat pencegahan dan pemeliharaan. Medan: USU Press, 2008. p. 4-18.

Riskesdas. Laporan Hasil Riset Kesehatan Dasar 2007. Jakarta. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan. Available from: www.litbang.depkes.go.id/download/Riskesdas [Cited 4 Jun 2011]. 2007.

WHO. Global Goals for the Year 2020. Available from: http://www.whocollab.od.mah.se/index.html. [Cited 6 Jun 2011].2005.

WHO. Oral Health Surveys Basic Methode. 4th ed. Geneva. 1997.

Departemen Kesehatan RI. 1999. Rencana Pembangunan Kesehatan Menuju Indonesia Sehat 2010. Jakarta. Dep Kes RI.

WHO. The world health report. Available from: https://www.who.int/whr/1995/en/whr95_en.pdf. [Cited 6 Jun 2011]. 1995.

Nikiforuk G. Understanding Dental Caries. Prevention Basic and Clinical Aspects. Basel, Karger, 1985;2:I-XIII.

Axelsson P. Diagnosis and Risk Prediction of Dental Caries Vol 2. Illinois: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc. 2000. p. 44-6, 77-80.

Dental Practice Education Research Unit of Dental School Aldelaide, 2002?

Robin. 23 November 2009. Dental Diet. Available from:http://www.articlealley.com/article_1243432_17.html [Cited 16 Jul 2011].

Leinfelder KF. Do restorations made of amalgam outlast those made of resin-based composite. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:1186-7.

Anusavice KJ. 2003. Philip’s Science of Dental Materials. 11th ed. St. Louis. USA: Elsevier Science. 2003. p. 430-3.

Awni M, Al Kayed. A clinical study of placement and replacement of composite restorations in Jordan. Saudi Dental Journal. 1999;11(2):53-9.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjd.vol26no2.26697

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Visitor Stat

Creative Commons License
Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License