Orthognathic surgery case overview in patients with class III dentoskeletal Angle classification

Dimas Ilham Hutomo, Ida Ayu Astuti, Borman Sumaji

Abstract


Introduction: Angle classification is a classification commonly used for malocclusion in the field of orthodontics. Mandibular prognation is one of the skeletal features of Class III dentoskeletal classification or defined as mesiocclusion. The prevalence of class III dentoskeletal occurrence in Asian populations is much higher than Caucasian racial populations. Aim of research is to obtain data of Orthognathic surgery case overview in patients with class III dentoskeletal angle classification Methods: Type of research is using a retrospective descriptive method by taking secondary data from medical record cards of orthognathic surgery cases. The population in this study were all medical record data of patients undergoing orthognathic surgical treatment in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of RSUP Dr. Hasan Sadikin 2006-2011 period. The sample in this study is medical record data of patients with Class III dentoskeletal classification performed orthognathic surgery in the period 2006-2011. then classified by year of surgery, sex, age, Angle classification, state of anterior open bite, location of surgery, and technique used in surgery. Result: 2% of orthognathic surgical patients have a Class III Angle relationship and only 8% of orthognathic surgical patients have a Class II Angle relation. Based on the anterior tooth overbite relation in patients with an Angle class III relationship, there are 16 patients who have an open bite relation on the anterior teeth. Only 8 patients from Angle III class relationships were treated with orthognathy without an anterior open bite relation.Conclusion: In the period 2006-2011, the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dr. Hasan Sadikin handled 26 orthognathic surgical patients, The most orthognathic surgical patients were in the age group of 21-25 years and the difference in the number of male and female patients was only small, Cases of orthognathic surgery in patients with class dentoskeletal Angle classification III is the most handled case by the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dr. Hasan Sadikin Bandung in the period 2006-2011 reached 92.31% of all orthognathic surgery cases or 24 cases. (4) Most orthognathic surgical patients with Class III dentoskeletal classification have an anterior open bite relation. The most commonly performed surgical techniques for patients with Class III dentoskeletal classification are bimaxillary surgical techniques with a combination of Le Fort 1 osteotomy techniques on the maxilla and sagittal split osteotomy and genioplasty of the mandible.


Keywords


Orthognathic surgery, Angle classification, class III dentoskeletal.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Reyneke, Johan P. Essentials of orthognathic surgery. 1st ed. China: Quintessence Book. 2003. p. 13-61.

Premkumar S. Prep Manual for undergraduates orthodontics. New Delhi: Elsevier. 2008. p. 125-127,162-164.

Zhou YH, Hägg U, Rabie AB. Concerns and motivations of skeletal class III patients receiving orthodontic-surgical correction. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 2001;16:7–17

Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th ed. Missouri: Mosby. 2007. p. 686-701.

Heasman, Peter. 2003. Master Dentistry. Volume I. Spain: Churchill Livingstone. 137-138.

Panula K. Correction of Dentofacial Deformities with Orthognathic Surgery: Outcome of Treatment with Special Reference to Costs, Benefits and Risks. Thesis. Available from: http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514269934/html/index.htmloulu [Cited 12 Feb 2012]. 2003.

Faure JC, Rieffe C, Maltha JC. The influence of different facial components on facial aesthetics. Eur J Orthod. 2002 Feb;24(1):1-7.

Soemantri ESS, Astuti IA. Sepuluh Tahun Perawatan Bedah Ortognati di Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran (1990-2000). Bandung: Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran. 2000.

Mucedero M, Coviello A, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Cozza P. Stability factors after double-jaw surgery in class III malocclusion – A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2008 Nov;78(6):1141-52.

Epker, Bruce N. Dentofacial Deformities: Intergrated Orthodontic and Surgical Correction Volume II. 2nd ed. New York: Mosby. 1995. p. 569-571, 574-576, 849.

Tuinzing DB, Greebe RB, Dorenbos J. 1993. Surgical Orthodontics: Diagnosis and Treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52(6):653.

Enacar A. Effects of single or double-jaw surgery on vertical dimension in skeletal class III patients. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 2001;16:30–5.

Stansbury CD, Evans CA, Miloro M, BeGole EA, Morris DE. Stability of open bite correction with sagittal split osteotomy and closing rotation of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jan;68(1):149-59.

Arad I, Jandu J, Bassett P, Fleming PS. Influence of single-jaw surgery vs bimaxillary surgery on the outcome and duration of combined orthodontic-surgical treatment. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:983–7.

Kitahara T, Nakasima A, Kurahara S, Shiratsuchi Y. Hard and soft tissue stability of orthognathic surgery: sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:158–165.)

Kim SK, Kim SG. Analysis of soft tissue changes after genioplasty in skeletal class III dentofacial deformity. Yonsei Med 2009;50(6):814-7.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjd.vol25no2.26788

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Visitor Stat

Creative Commons License
Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License