Changes in dentofacial vertical dimension with class I before and after treatment orthodontic appliance with and without extractions of first four premolar teeth

Fitri Octavianti, Jono Salim, Bergman Thahar, Endah Mardiati

Abstract


Introduction: There are different opinions on the effect of extraction on the first four premolar teeth. The purpose of this study is to analyzed change of dentofacial vertical dimension before and after orthodontic treatment for two groups of patients treated with and without extractions of first four premolar teeth. Methods: A method by Sivakumar and Valiathan (2008) using lateral cephalometry on 20 extraction cases and 15 cases of non-extraction was employed. Tracing was conducted before and after orthodontic treatment and some 13 measurements were conducted manually using a protractor, i.e. mandibular plane angle, anterior facial height, lower anterior facial height, posterior facial height, facial height index, FH-U1, FH-U6, FL -L1, FL-L6, Svertical-U1, Svertical-U6, Pogvertical-L1-L6 Pogvertical. Statistical analysis using t-test with P> 0.05 for paired, Showed that there was no significant changes in dentofacial vertical dimension for malocclusion Class I cases before and after treatment for samples treated with and without extraction of the first four premolar teeth for both groups of samples. Results: No significant difference found in the dentofacial vertical dimension for the extraction and non-extraction groups of samples. Conclusion: orthodontic treatment for class I malocclusion cases, both with and without extraction, did not cause any significant difference in the dentofacial vertical dimension. Showed that there was no significant changes in dentofacial vertical dimension for class I malocclusion cases before and after treatment for samples treated with and without extraction of the first four premolar teeth for both groups of samples. Results: No significant difference found in the dentofacial vertical dimension for the extraction and non-extraction groups of samples. No significant difference found in the dentofacial vertical dimension for the extraction and non-extraction groups of samples. Conclusion: There are no changes in the vertical dimension of dentofacial before and after treatment in Class I with a retraction and extraction four first premolars fixed orthodontic appliance.


Keywords


Class I malocclusion, dentofacial vertical dimension, extraction, fixed orthodontics.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL. Orthodontics current principles and technique. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby Company; 1994. p. 64-75.

Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 4th ed. Mosby Inc: St. Louis Philadelphia; 2007. p. 4, 201, 218-20, 282.

Schudy FF. The rotation of the mandible the resulting from growth: its implications in orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1965; 35: 36-50.

Cusinamo C, McLaughlin RP. Effect of first bicuspid extraction on height in the high-angle cases. J Clin Orthod 1993; 27: 594-6.

Sivakumar A, Valiathan A. Cephalometric assessment of vertical dentofacial changes in Class I subjects treated with and without extraction. Am J Orthod dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133; 869-75.

JA staggers. Vertical following chages first premolars extractions. Am J Orthod dentofacial Orthop 1994; 105: 19-24.

Koradereli I. The effect of first premolar extraction on vertical dimension. Am J Orthod dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116: 42-5.

AL Chua, Lim JY, Lubit EC. The effect of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontics treatment on the growth of the lower anterior face height. Am J Orthod dentofacial Orthop 1993; 104: 361-8.

Hayasaki BC. Influence of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment in Japanese-Brazilians with class I and class II division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127: 30-6.

Kim TK. First or second premolar extraction effect on facial vertical dimension. Angle Orthodontist 2005; 75: 177-182.

Hui Cen. Relations lower anterior facial vertical dimension to the vertical dimension incisor and molar teeth under the Class II division I with mandibular retrognati absolute, [thesis]. Bandung: Unpad. 2005.

English JD, Peltomaki T, Pham K. Orthodontic review, Mosby: St.Louis; 2009. p. 53, 58-9.

Enlow DH. Handbook of facial growth. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1975. p. 264-5.

Wyatt NE. Preventing adverse effects on the temporomandibular joint through orthodontics treatment. Am J Orthod dentofacial Orthop 1987; 91: 493-9.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjd.vol22no2.26853

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Visitor Stat

Creative Commons License
Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry is licensed underĀ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License