Differences of anteroposterior facial dimensions in male and female children on intermediate mixed and early permanent dentition using Cervical Vertebrae Maturation Index

Ica Listania; Sri Kuswandari; Putri Kusuma Wardani Mahendra

doi:10.24198/pjd.vol33no3.30947

Differences of anteroposterior facial dimensions in male and female children on intermediate mixed and early permanent dentition using Cervical Vertebrae Maturation Index

Ica Listania, Sri Kuswandari, Putri Kusuma Wardani Mahendra

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical vertebrae are one of the indicators for craniofacial bones maturation. Timing of craniofacial bone maturation determined achievement of orthodontic early treatment. Some previous researchers recommended cervical vertebral maturation to assess craniofacial growth. This study was aimed to analyse the differences of anteroposterior facial dimensions in male and female children on intermediate mixed and early permanent dentition using Cervical Vertebrae Maturation Index (CVMI). Methods: An analytic observational study with a cross-sectional design was conducted on the students of Islamic Elementary School (Madrasah Ibtidaiyah) in Depok district, Sleman, Yogyakarta, from July 2019 to January 2020. Subjects consisted of 22 males and 22 females aged 8-11 years, obtained by a consecutive sampling technique. The anteroposterior facial analysis was performed on the lateral cephalometry for measuring the distance of Sella turcica to Nasion (S-N) representing the anterior cranial base, Posterior Nasal Spine to Anterior Nasal Spine (PNS-ANS) representing the maxilla and Gonion-Menton (Go-Me) and Condylion-Gnathion (Co-Gn) represents the mandible. Assessment of CVMI was decided by the Hassel and Farman methods. Data were analysed by One Way ANOVA. Results: The mean value of S-N, PNS-ANS, Go-Me, and Co-Gn dimensions, generally were higher in males than females; however, only dimensions of maxillary and mandibular were showed significant difference (p<0.05), while the S-N dimension was not significantly different (p>0.05). At the interval of CVMI 3 and 4, the Go-Me and Co-Gn dimensions showed a significant difference (p<0.05) both in males and females. Conclusion: There was a difference in anteroposterior dimensions of the maxillary and mandibular in cervical vertebral maturation in children with intermediate mixed and early permanent dentition, however, no difference was found in the anterior cranial base.

Keywords

anteroposterior facial dimension; cervical vertebral maturation; intermediate mixed dentition; early permanent dentition

Full Text:

PDF

References

REFERENCES

Proffit WR, Fields HW. Contemporary Orthodontics. 3rd ed. St. Loius: Mosby Elsevier. 2000. p. 24-106.

Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedic. Semin Orthod. 2005; 11: 119-29. DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.005

Demirjian A, Buschang PH, Tanguay R, Patterson DK. Interrelationships among measures of somatic, skeletal, dental, and sexual maturity. Am J Orthod. 1985; 88: 433-438. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90070-3

Krailassiri S, Anuwongnukroh N, Dechkunakorn S. Relationships between dental calcification stages and skeletal maturity indicators in thai individuals. Angle Orthod. 2002; 72(2): 155-166. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0155:RBDCSA>2.0.CO;2

Franchi L, Baccetti T, Toffol LD, Polimeni A, Cozza P. Phases of the dentition for the assessment of skeletal maturity: a diagnostic performance study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133: 395-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.040

Hassel B, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995; 107:58-66. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70157-5

Caldas MP, Ambrosano GMB, Haiter-Neto Francisco. Use of cervical vertebral dimensions for assessment of children growth. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2007; 15(2):144-7. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572007000200014

Hamilah-D-Koesoemahardja. Pola pertumbuhan jaringan lunak kraniofasial serta kaitannya dengan pola pertumbuhan jaringan keras kraniofasial dan pertumbuhan umum. FKG Trisakti. Jakarta. 1991.

Damian MF, Cechinato F, Molina RD, Woitchunas FE. Relationship between cranial and mandibular growth and the stages of maturation of the cervical vertebrae. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007; 15(2):115-9. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572007000200008

O’Reilly MT, Yanniello GJ, Mandibular growth changes and maturation of cervical vertebrae: a longitudinal cephalometric study. Angle Orthod. 1988; 58: 179–184. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1988)058<0179:MGCAMO>2.0.CO;2

Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA. Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 118:335-40. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.107009

Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth LR, McNamara JAJr. Treatment timing for twin-block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 118: 159–170. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.105571

Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 2002; 72: 316-323. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219

Hägg U, Pancherz H. Dentofacial orthopaedics in relation to chronological age, growth period and skeletal development: an analysis of 72 male patients with class II division 1 malocclusion treated with the herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod. 1988; 10: 169-76. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/10.3.169

Malmgren O, O¨mblus J, Hägg U, Pancherz H. Treatment with an appliance system in relation to treatment intensity and growth periods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987; 91: 143–151. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(87)90472-0

Bishara SE, Justus R, Graber TM. Proceedings of the workshop discussions held on early treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998; 113: 5–6.

Hamilah-D-Koesoemahardja, Ary-Indrawaty, Isnani-Jenie. Tumbuh kembang dentofasial manusia. FKG Trisakti. Jakarta. 2013.

Foster TD. Buku ajar ortodonsi. Edisi ke-3. EGC. Jakarta. 2016; p. 1-20.

Dixon AD. Anatomi untuk kedokteran gigi (terj). Hipokrates. Jakarta. 1993; p. 410-432.

Arat ZM, Rübendüz M, Akgül AA. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73(4):374-80. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0374:TDOCRL>2.0.CO;2

Sperber GH. Embriologi kraniofasial (terj). Hipokrates. Jakarta. Edisi 4. 1991; p. 101-117.

Gu Y, McNamara JA. Mandibular growth changes and cervical vertebrae maturation. Angle Orthodontist. 2007; 77(6): 947-953. DOI: 10.2319/071006-284.1

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjd.vol33no3.30947