Surface roughness differences of bis-acryl provisional crown material under different toothbrush filament and toothpaste abrasive degree: a laboratory experimental study
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Brushing of provisional crown material using a toothbrush and abrasive toothpaste induces surface roughness. This study, therefore, aims to determine the difference in surface roughness on provisional crown materials after brushing with soft and medium filament toothbrushes using high and low abrasive toothpaste. Methods: This type of laboratory experimental research employed a pre-test and post-test group design of 40 samples divided into four groups of ten samples each. The groups consisted of Group A (bis-acrylic temporary crown material brushed with medium-filament toothbrush and high-abrasive toothpaste), Group B (bis-acrylic temporary crown material brushed with soft-filament toothbrush and high-abrasive toothpaste), Group C (bis-acrylic temporary crown material brushed with medium-filament toothbrush and low-abrasive toothpaste), and Group D (bis-acrylic temporary crown material brushed with soft-filament toothbrush and low-abrasive toothpaste). The sample brushing method was carried out using a Modified V8-Brushing Machine tool for 2000 cycles at a speed of 120 cycles/minute and a 0.2 N pressure. Results: A profilometer was used to measure surface roughness. The mean value of surface roughness was analyzed by a univariate test, yielding groups A (0.41 µm ± 0.18), B (0.36 µm ± 0.13), C (0.40 µm ± 0.15), and D (0.25 µm ± 0.09). The Kruskal-Wallis Statistical analysis test determined significant differences among test groups. This study indicates that the surface roughness of bis-acryl provisional crown material brushed with soft and medium-filament toothbrushes differed from that with a combination of high and low-abrasive toothpaste p = 0.001 (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Brushing provisional crown materials with a medium-filament toothbrush resulted in a higher roughness value than with a soft-filament toothbrush, and the group that brushed with high-abrasive toothpaste showed higher roughness values than that with low-abrasive toothpaste.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad I. Prosthodontics at a Glance. 1 ed. Hongkong: Toppan Best-set Premedia Limited; 2012:84.
Singh A, Garg S. Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Provisional Crown and Bridge Materials-An Invitro Study. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2016;10(8):6–11.
D KP, Shetty M, Alva H, D AP. Provisional Restorations In Prosthodontic Rehabilitations - Concepts , Materials And Techniques. Nitte Univ J Heal Sci. 2020;2(2):72–77.
Tupinambá ÍVM, Giampá PCC, Rocha IAR, Lima EMCX. Effect of different polishing methods on surface roughness of provisional prosthetic materials. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018;18(2):96–101.
Lara-Jara NU, Romo-Ramírez GF, del Pilar Goldaracena-Azuara M, et al. Effect of Polishing Procedure on the Roughness and Bacterial Adhesion of Provisional Restorative Materials. Microsc Res. 2018;6(2):9–18.
Alshehab AH, Alhazoom AA, Alowa MH, Alali HA, Abdulmohsen AA. Effect of bristle stiffness of manual toothbrushes on normal and demineralized human enamel — An in vitro profilometric study. Int J Dent Hyg. 2018:1–5.
Hara AT, Msd DDS, Turssi CP, Msd DDS. Baking soda as an abrasive in toothpastes. J Am Dent Assoc. 2017;148(11):27–33.
Roselino LDMR, Torrieri RT, Sbardelotto C, Amorim AA, Arruda CNFD, Tirapelli C, et al. Color stability and surface roughness of composite resins submitted to brushing with bleaching toothpaste: An in situ study. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019; 31(5): 383-9.
Ranzan N, Muniz WMG, R€osing CK. Are bristle stiffness and bristle end-shape related to adverse effects on soft tissues during toothbrushing ? A systematic review. Int Dent J. 2018;69(3):1–12.
Al-Qahtani K, Bounni RS Al, Omari M Al, Assery M. Wear and Surface Roughness of Three different Composite Resins after Simulated Toothbrushing : An in vitro Study. Int J Oral Care Res. 2017;5(2):1–6.
Jeong MJ, Cho HA, Kim SY, Kang KR, Lee EB, Lee YJ, et al. Effect of ultra-soft and soft toothbrushes on the removal of plaque and tooth abrasion. J Dent Hyg Sci 2018; 18(3): 164-71.
Zairani O, Irawan B, Damiyanti M. The effect of toothbrush bristle stiffness on nanohybrid surface roughness. J Phys Conf. 2017:1–8.
Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Fischer NG, et al. Wear of resin composites : Current insights into underlying mechanisms , evaluation methods and influential factors. Japan Dent Sci Rev. 2018;54(2):76–87.
Oliveira GU, Mondelli RFL, Rodrigues MC, Franco EB, Ishikiriama SK, Wang L. Impact of filler size and distribution on roughness and wear of composite resin after stimulated toothbrushing. J Appl Oral Sci 2012; 20(5): 510-6.
Lippert F, Arrageg MA, Eckert GJ, Hara AT. Interaction between toothpaste abrasivity and toothbrush fi lament stiffness on the development of erosive / abrasive lesions in vitro. Int Dent J. 2017;67(6):1–7.
Santos PH dos, Brogin FF, Catelan A, Suzuki TYU, Guedes APA, Pavan S. Effect of whitening and desensitizing dentifrices on composite surfaces treated with surface sealants. J Investig Clin Dent. 2013;4:101–106.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjd.vol35no2.46395
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Visitor Stat
Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License