Multi-target potential of moringa oleifera-derived compounds against cariogenic and endodontic virulence proteins revealed by molecular docking: an in silico experimental study

Meiny Faudah Amin, Dikdik Kurnia, Taufiq Ariwibowo, Dicky Hardi

Abstract


Introduction: Dental infections are multifactorial diseases involving bacterial biofilms and host immune responses. Natural compounds with antibacterial activity, such as Moringa oleifera, have been explored as alternatives to conventional antibiotics.  This study aimed to evaluate the interaction profiles of four Moringa oleifera–derived compounds against multiple virulence-associated proteins of cariogenic and endodontic pathogens using in silico molecular docking. Methods: This study was an in silico experimental study using molecular docking simulations to evaluate the binding energy of four M. oleifera-derived compounds (eugenol, trans-anethole, arachidonic acid, and phytosphingosine) with five key virulence-associated proteins of cariogenic and endodontic pathogens (Cystalysin, SrpA, FimA, RadD, and Ddl). AutoDock 4.0 was used for the docking simulations. Docking results were analyzed based on binding energy (ΔG) and inhibition constant (Ki) values. The best binding conformations were selected according to the lowest binding energy and visualized to identify key ligand–protein interactions using Discovery Studio Visualizer. Results: The phytosphingosine-Ddl exhibited the lowest binding energy of -7.42 kcal/mol, followed by eugenol with three different receptors (Cystalysin, SrpA, and FimA) and arachidonic acid-RadD. The lowest inhibition constant was shown by the phytosphingosine-Ddl complex at 3.61 µM. Each compound interacted with various targets, but phytosphingosine exhibited the most consistent and widespread predicted binding via hydrogen bonds with Glu222, Arg291, Glu306, Asp293, Lys251, and hydrophobic interactions of Phe295, Phe245, Phe175, and Leu145. Conclusion: This in silico molecular docking study demonstrated that Moringa oleifera–derived compounds, particularly phytosphingosine, exhibit strong binding affinity toward key virulence-associated proteins of cariogenic and endodontic pathogens. These findings highlight the potential of M. oleifera as a natural source of antibacterial agents and support further experimental validation of its therapeutic applications in oral infections.

Keywords


Molecular docking, moringa oleifera, dental caries, cariogenic bacteria, virulence factors

Full Text:

PDF

References


Könönen E, Gursoy M, Gursoy UK. Periodontitis: a multifaceted disease of tooth-supporting tissues. J Clin Med. 2019;8(8):1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8081135

Giambartolomei GH, Delpino MV. Immunopathogenesis of hepatic brucellosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2019.00423

Kwon T, Lamster IB, Levin L. Current concepts in the management of periodontitis. Int Dent J. 2021;71(6):462–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12630

Miller DP. Microbial biofilms and pathobiology of gingivitis and periodontitis. In: Oral Biofilms in Health and Disease. Cham: Springer; 2025. p. 275–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82202-510

GC B, Wu C. The CarSR two-component system directly controls radD expression as a global regulator that senses bacterial coaggregation in Fusobacterium nucleatum. J Bacteriol. 2025;207(6):e00529-24. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-24

Zhu F, Zhang H, Yang T, Haslam SM, Dell A, Wu H. Engineering and dissecting the glycosylation pathway of a streptococcal serine-rich repeat adhesion. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(13):4952–4963. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.AAC118.002681

Hasegawa Y, Nagano K. Porphyromonas gingivalis FimA and Mfa1 fimbriae: current insights on localization, function, biogenesis, and genotype. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2021;57:190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.09.003

Batson S, de Chiara C, Majce V, Lloyd AJ, Gobec S, Rea D, et al. Inhibition of D-Ala:D-Ala ligase through a phosphorylated form of the antibiotic D-cycloserine. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1939. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02118-7

Şenel S. An overview of physical, microbiological and immune barriers of oral mucosa. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(15):7821. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22157821

Elbestawy MK, El-Sherbiny GM, Moghannem SA. Antibacterial, antibiofilm and anti-inflammatory activities of eugenol clove essential oil against resistant Helicobacter pylori. Molecules. 2023;28(6):2448. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062448

Chamlagain M, Hu J, Sionov RV, Steinberg D. Anti-bacterial and anti-biofilm activities of arachidonic acid against the cariogenic bacterium Streptococcus mutans. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1333274. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1333274

Glenz R, Kaiping A, Göpfert D, Weber H, Lambour B, Sylvester M, et al. The major plant sphingolipid long-chain base phytosphingosine inhibits growth of bacterial and fungal plant pathogens. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1081. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05083-4

Medeiros M, Alves M, Santos B, Silva E, Araújo F, Bezerra M, et al. Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of trans-anethole against Enterococcus cloacae and Enterococcus faecalis strains of food origin. Braz J Biol. 2023;83:e269245. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.269245

Dixit K, Chauhan B, Jain R. Anti-inflammatory potential of medicinal plants in the management of inflammatory diseases: a review of mechanisms and bioactive compounds. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2025;15(6). https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v15i6.7203

Ojewumi ME, Obanla OR, Atauba DM. A review on the efficacy of Ocimum gratissimum, Mentha spicata, and Moringa oleifera leaf extracts in repelling mosquito. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci. 2021;10(1):87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-021-00176-x

Jaya FB, Syamsunarno MRAA, Sahiratmadja E. Moringa oleifera Lam. to accelerate wound healing: a review. Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran. 2023;55(3). https://doi.org/10.19106/JMedSci005503202310

Baky NAA, Fouad LM, Ahmed KA, Alzokaky AA. Mechanistic insight into the hepatoprotective effect of Moringa oleifera Lam leaf extract and telmisartan against carbon tetrachloride-induced liver fibrosis. Drug Chem Toxicol. 2025;48(1):84–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01480545.2024.2358066

Vergara-Jimenez M, Almatrafi MM, Fernandez ML. Bioactive components in Moringa oleifera leaves protect against chronic disease. Antioxidants. 2017;6(4):91. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox6040091

Yasir M, Park J, Han ET, Han JH, Park WS, Choe J, et al. Identification of marine compounds inhibiting NF-κB-inducing kinase through molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations. Biomolecules. 2024;14(12):1490. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14121490

Vikhar DA, Khan SW, Ali SA, Yasar Q. Network pharmacology combined with molecular docking and experimental verification to elucidate the effect of flavan-3-ols and aromatic resin on anxiety. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):9799. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58877-z

Fattouche M. Multi-combined drug-likeness, 3D-QSAR modeling, molecular docking and molecular dynamics analysis of several series of pharmaceutical compounds [dissertation]. Biskra: Université Mohamed Khider; 2024.

Meng XY, Zhang HX, Mezei M, Cui M. Molecular docking: a powerful approach for structure-based drug discovery. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des. 2011;7(2):146–157. https://doi.org/10.2174/157340911795677602

Gilson MK, Zhou HX. Calculation of protein–ligand binding affinities. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2007;36(1):21–42. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.36.040306.132550

Zothantluanga JH, Chetia D. A beginner’s guide to molecular docking. Sci Phytochem. 2022;1(2):90–93. https://doi.org/10.58920/sciphy01020037

Pantsar T, Poso A. Binding affinity via docking: fact and fiction. Molecules. 2018;23(8):1899. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23081899

Plummer C, Wu H, Kerrigan SW, Meade G, Cox D, Ian Douglas CW. A serine-rich glycoprotein of Streptococcus sanguis mediates adhesion to platelets via GPIb. Br J Haematol. 2005;129(1):101–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05421.x

Buchanan CJ, Gaunt B, Harrison PJ, Yang Y, Liu J, Khan A, et al. Pathogen-sugar interactions revealed by universal saturation transfer analysis. Science. 2022;377(6604):eabm3125. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm3125

Mishra A, Devarajan B, Reardon ME, Dwivedi P, Krishnan V, Cisar JO, et al. Two autonomous structural modules in the fimbrial shaft adhesin FimA mediate Actinomyces interactions with streptococci and host cells during oral biofilm development. Mol Microbiol. 2011;81(5):1205–1220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07745.x

Skolnick J, Zhou H. Implications of the essential role of small molecule ligand binding pockets in protein–protein interactions. J Phys Chem B. 2022;126(36):6853–6867. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c04525

Kaplan CW, Lux R, Haake SK, Shi W. The Fusobacterium nucleatum outer membrane protein RadD is an arginine-inhibitable adhesin required for inter-species adherence and the structured architecture of multispecies biofilm. Mol Microbiol. 2009;71(1):35–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06503.x

Komarov IV, Bugrov VA, Cherednychenko A, Grygorenko OO. Insights into modeling approaches in chemistry: assessing ligand–protein binding thermodynamics based on rigid–flexible model molecules. Chem Rec. 2024;24(2):e202300276. https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.202300276

Qin Y, Xu L, Teng Y, Wang Y, Ma P. Discovery of novel antibacterial agents: recent developments in D-alanyl-D-alanine ligase inhibitors. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2021;98(3):305–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.13899

Nocentini A. D-alanine–D-alanine ligase. In: Metalloenzymes. 2024. p. 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823974-2.00009-7

Chen D, Oezguen N, Urvil P, Ferguson C, Dann SM, Savidge TC. Regulation of protein–ligand binding affinity by hydrogen bond pairing. Sci Adv. 2016;2(3):e1501240. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501240

Bertalan É, Lešnik S, Bren U, Bondar AN. Protein–water hydrogen-bond networks of G protein-coupled receptors. J Struct Biol. 2020;212(3):107634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2020.107634

Zhao G, Liu X, Wang S, Bai Z, Zhang S, Wang Y, et al. Hydrogen bonding penalty used for virtual screening to discover potent inhibitors for papain-like cysteine proteases of SARS-CoV-2. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2022;100(4):502–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.14115

Kawatkar SP, Keating TA, Olivier NB, Breen JN, Green OM, Guler SY, et al. Antibacterial inhibitors of gram-positive thymidylate kinase: structure–activity relationships and chiral preference of a new hydrophobic binding region. J Med Chem. 2014;57(11):4584–4597. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm500463c

Bitencourt-Ferreira G, Veit-Acosta M, de Azevedo WF Jr. Van der Waals potential in protein complexes. In: Docking Screens for Drug Discovery. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9752-7_6

Li J, Ma X, Guo S, Hou C, Shi L, Zhang H, et al. A hydrophobic-interaction-based mechanism triggers docking between the SARS-CoV-2 spike and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Glob Chall. 2020;4(12):2000067. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202000067

Du X, Li Y, Xia YL, Ai SM, Liang J, Sang P, et al. Insights into protein–ligand interactions: mechanisms, models, and methods. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(2):144. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17020144




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjd.vol38no1.65729

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Creative Commons License All publications by the Universitas Padjadjaran [e-ISSN: 2549-6212, p-ISSN: 1979-0201] are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.This license requires that reusers give credit to the creator. It allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, for noncommercial purposes only.

Visitor Stat