Stakeholders collaboration management of Rinjani Lombok UNESCO Global Geopark: social capital perspectives
Abstract
Background: The Executive Board of RLUGGp Management Agency, officially, is the designated technical organizer for Lombok Rinjani Geopark, established by the Governor of West Nusa Tenggara. However, in reality, it needs more authority to manage the Lombok Rinjani Geopark area. The Executive Board of RLUGGp Management office can only fulfill its functions with jurisdictional control over regional management. Purpose: This research aims to investigate the forms of collaboration among the actors involved in managing Geopark Rinjani Lombok. Methods: It is a qualitative and explorative case study, with data collection through In-depth interviews, participatory observations, and document analysis. Results: Stakeholder classification according to geopark management: (1) stakeholders based on their connection to the areas within the delineation of Geopark Rinjani Lombok; (2) stakeholders based on their hierarchical position within the government structure; (3) stakeholders who are part of the internal staffs of Geopark Rinjani Lombok Management Board; and (4) stakeholders supporting the management of Geopark Rinjani Lombok. The voluntary formation of interpersonal connections and the cultivation of trust among stakeholders, who are social actors within a social system, serve as the foundation for collaboration, coordination, and communication. Conclusion: Communities are pivotal in the successful execution of diverse development programs within Rinjani Lombok Geopark. Additionally, the Rinjani Geopark Youth Forum (RGYF) serves as the most substantial additional force in the execution of all programs. Implications: The dissatisfaction of each actor will hinder the achievement of the program objectives. Effective managerial communication should be practiced by a leader with authority and a significant role in the management of Geopark Rinjani Lombok.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adom, D., Yeboah, A., & Ankrah, A. K. (2016). Constructivism philosophical paradigm: Implication for research, teaching, and learning. Global Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(10), 1–9.
Álvarez, R. F. (2020). Geoparks and education: UNESCO global geopark villuercas-ibores-jara as a case study in spain. Geosciences, 10(27). https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10010027
Bajari, A., & Prastowo, F. A. A. (2021). Pengantar strategi manajemen komunikasi. Unpad Press.
Bakti, I., Sumartias, S., Damayanti, T., & Ruchiat, A. (2018). Pengembangan model komunikasi pariwisata berbasis kearifan lokal di kawasan geopark Pangandaran. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 6(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v6i2.18459
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
Bourne, L. (2013). Controls communicate? Construction CPM Conference.
Bourne, L. (2016). Stakeholder relationship management: a maturity model for organisational implementation. Routledge-Taylor & Francis Group.
Burlando, M., Firpo, M., Queirolo, C., Rovere, A., & Vacchi, M. (2011). From geoheritage to sustainable development: Strategies and perspectives in the Beigua Geopark (italy). Geoheritage, 3(2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0019-4
Claridge, T. (2018). Introduction to social capital theory socap101 tristan claridge. www.socialcapitalresearch.com
Du, Y., & Girault, Y. (2018). A genealogy of unesco global geopark: Emergence and evolution. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 6(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.17149/ijgp.j.issn.2577.4441.2018.02.001
Farsani, N. T., Coelho, C. O. A., Costa, C. M. M., & Amrikazemi, A. (2014). Geo-knowledge management and geoconservation via geoparks and geotourism. Geoheritage, 6(3), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0099-7
Fauzi, N. S. M., & Misni, A. (2022). The impact of geopark recognition on kilim karst geoforest park, Langkawi. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 10(4), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.10.4_209
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th edition). Pearson Education.
Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23–48.
Octavianti, M., Mulyana, S., & Sugiana, D. (2018). The optimization of telegram bot in improving the cohesiveness of Bandung raya confero community. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114(conference 1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012077
Pásková, M., & Zelenka, J. (2018). Sustainability management of unesco global geoparks. Sustainable Geoscience and Geotourism, 2, 44–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/SGG.2.44
Patiro, S. P. S., Hendarto, K. A., Hendrian, H., Budiyanti, H., Al-Hasan, R., Yumantoko, Y., Nur, A., Kurniawan, E., Yuniarti, N., Desmiwati, D., Wisudayati, T. A., Cahyono, D. D. N., Pratama, Y. S. A., Nugraheni, Y. M. M. A., & Yatma, T. D. N. (2023). Stakeholders’ attitude toward ecotourism development in Rinjani-Lombok geopark: The evidence from mount rinjani national park. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 25(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.9744/jmk.25.1.41-54
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton University Press.
Rajhans, K. (2018). Effective communication management: a key to stakeholder relationship management in project-based organizations.
Saidin, S., Azman, N., Komoo, I., Halim, S. A., Stacey, N., & Izurieta, A. (2015). Strengthening shared values through the strategy of public education: A case study of Kilim Geoforest Park, Malaysia Pengukuhan nilai sepunya melalui strategi pendidikan awam: Kajian kes Kilim Geoforest Park, Malaysia. Kajian Malaysia, 33(2), 83–115.
Septiana, A. R., Samodra, H., & Lamatenggo, Y. N. (2023). Geopark as a participatory collaborative management concept to manage the raja ampat archipelago. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1163(1), 012021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1163/1/012021
Smith, C. A., & Peterson, G. (2014). Quaternary geomorphology of the Siljan area, central Sweden. Journal of Maps, 10(4), 521–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2014.890958
Starman, A. B. (2013). The case study as a type of qualitative research. Jurnal of Contemporary Educational Studies, 1(1), 28–43.
Sugiyono. (2016). Memahami penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Studi kasus: design dan metode. Raja Grafindo Persada.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/prh.v8i1.48134
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Meria Octavianti, Asep Suryana, Atwar Bajari, Nurzali Ismail

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
PRofesi Humas Indexed by:
Editorial Office of PRofesi Humas:
Faculty of Communication Science, Universitas Padjadjaran
Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang, Indonesia 45363
WA: +6282316731181 (Chat Only)
Telephone: +62227796954
Faxmile: +62227794122
Email: jurnal.profesihumas.fikom@unpad.ac.id
PRofesi Humas Supervised by:
View My Stats