Building CSR legitimacy through intercultural communication in Bula’s Community

Elnovani Lusiana, Ute Lies Siti Khadijah, Rully Khairul Anwar, Isma Rosila Ismail

Abstract


Background: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), has often been viewed along the lines of technocratic compliance in the case of Bula, East Seram, an area of historical neglect and layered cultural diversity region. Technocratic Compliance sees CSR as little more than a box-ticking exercise, whereby the opportunity for real social community empowerment is lost. Purpose: The objective of this study is to propose an alternative pathway for CSR, which would involve the reframing of a socially bottomed phenomenon, ethnically and culturally integrated, from a prescriptive imposition  to an ethical, cross communicative practice of co-creation. Methods: The research poses a qualitative case study design. Data were integrated from the exercise of participant observation, document reviews, and semi-structured interviews with 15 informants, including representatives of the corporation, community leaders, and civil servants. This methodology enables the capturing of CSR phenomena from several perspectives. Results: Findings point to the generalized gap existing corporately centralized systems and community demands to be engaged in processes of collaboration and partnership. Interventions implemented in the absence of cultural dialogue are, at best, likely to interact with bureaucratic functions and survive as indifference. In contrast, initiatives designed and implemented in partnership demonstrated prevalence to social support and sustainable change. Conclusion: The study states that the legitimacy of CSR is not a function of positive legal prescription, but rather an outcome of meaningful, sustained dialogues across cultures. Implications: This research improves the understanding of CSR as a type of “social diplomacy.” It suggests that companies should treat philanthropic acts as more than a transaction, creating and sustaining culturally adaptive communications that respect local knowledge and promote a more just and more balanced industry-society relationship.

Keywords


Corporate social responsibility; intercultural communication; community legitimacy; cultural discourse; extractive industry

Full Text:

PDF

References


Addison, T., & Roe, A. (Eds.). (2018). Extractives for development: Introduction and ten main messages. In Extractive Industries: The Management of Resources as a Driver of Sustainable Development (pp. 3–30). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198817369.003.0001

Agius, C. (2022). Social Constructivist international relations and the military. In Handbook of Military Sciences (pp. 1–16). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02866-4_105-1

Bakti, I., Sjoraida, D. F., Wiyatna, M. F., Nugraha, A. R., & Setianti, Y. (2025). The social and environmental responsibility communication of Pos Indonesia regional 3. PRofesi Humas, 9(2), 242–265. https://doi.org/10.24198/prh.v9i2.54238

Bracho, M. S., Fernández, M., & Díaz, J. (2021). Técnicas e instrumentos de recolección de información: análisis y procesamiento realizado por el investigador cualitativo. Revista Científica UISRAEL, 8(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.35290/rcui.v8n1.2021.400

Brummer, K., & Oppermann, K. (2024). 4. Social constructivism. In Foreign Policy Analysis (pp. 64–87). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780192857453.003.0004

Burns, W. (2019). The case for case studies in the context of environmental issues—Updated. Case Studies in the Environment, 3(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2019.eic.001

Carter, M. J., & Fuller, C. (2016). Symbols, meaning, and action: The past, present, and future of symbolic interactionism. Current Sociology, 64(6), 931–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116638396

Dreher, J., & Santos, H. (2017). Sociology and phenomenology. Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais, 17(3), 385. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2017.3.29429

Hanazaki, N. (2024). Local and traditional knowledge systems, resistance, and socioenvironmental justice. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 20(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00641-0

Ibrahim, I. I., Ishaq, K., Wadari, M. S., & Salisu, A. (2024). The contributions of alfred schutz (1899-1959) to the evolution of phenomenology. Gusau Journal of Sociology, 4(3), 354–368. https://doi.org/10.57233/gujos.v4i3.21

Ifanda, A. T., & Sisdianto, E. (2024). Evaluasi dampak program CSR terhadap kesejahteraan masyarakat: Tinjauan literatur. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 1(4), 415–421. https://doi.org/10.61722/jemba.v1i4.535

Karupiah, P. (2022). Positivism. In Principles of Social Research Methodology (pp. 73–82). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_6

Khan, N. I. (2022). Case study as a method of qualitative research. In Research Anthology on Innovative Research Methodologies and Utilization Across Multiple Disciplines (pp. 452–472). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-3881-7.ch023

Klingebiel, S., Hartmann, F. L., Madani, E., Paintner, J., Rohe, R. A., Trebs, L., & Wolk, T. (2024). Methods for data collection and analysis. In Exploring the Effectiveness of International Knowledge Cooperation (pp. 43–50). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55704-0_4

Kordel, S., & Gruber, M. (2024). 4. Data analysis. In Migration Impact Assessment (pp. 69–78). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748939412-69

Kos, A., & Gudowski, J. (2022). Corporate social responsibility - legal conditions and local business practice. Journal of Modern Science, 48(1), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/149863

Koswara, A., Nugraha, A. R., & Damayanti, T. (2023). Fostering strategic function of public relations corporate - communication in corporate culture practices. PRofesi Humas Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hubungan Masyarakat, 8(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.24198/prh.v8i1.48565

Kowalski, R. (2016). A logical response to corporate social responsibility. Environment and Social Psychology, 1(2), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.18063/ESP.2016.02.001

Mardiana, W., & Irawati, A. (2019). Factors influence corporate social responsibility disclosure. Esensi: Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 9(2), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.15408/ess.v9i2.13582

Neale, J. (2016). Iterative categorization (IC): A systematic technique for analysing qualitative data. Addiction, 111(6), 1096–1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13314

Nesterova, I. (2024). Places: Responsibilities towards. In Concise Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 127–130). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800880344.ch23

Nielsen, A. E., & Thomsen, C. (2018). Reviewing corporate social responsibility communication: a legitimacy perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 23(4), 492–511. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2018-0042

Orsini, A. (2024). Max Weber. In Sociological Theory (pp. 157–204). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52539-1_6

Pariani, L., & Sarjan, M. (2024). Kearifan lokal dan pendekatan dalam pemanfaatan sumber daya alam untuk ekonomi Desa Sesaot. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, Dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal), 5(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceed.v5i1.276

Peddada, K., & Adam, N. A. (2019). Theory and practice of corporate social responsibility in a developing country context. In Opportunities and Pitfalls of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 101–114). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17102-5_6

Sagajoka, E., & Fatima, I. (2023). Kearifan lokal, modal sosial dan pembangunan berkelanjutan. ANALISIS, 13(2), 426–440. https://doi.org/10.37478/als.v13i2.2938

Schneider, A. (2022). Symbolic interactionism. In Theories in Social Psychology, Second Edition (pp. 317–349). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394266616.ch13

Setyadi, A. (2024). Corporate social responsibility in mining companies: Regulation and business role in Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 28–42. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i11.15755

Tripathi, K. P., Giri, S., & Tripathi, N. (2024). Post- positivism research paradigm and philosophical assumption of sport tourism. AWADHARANA, 8(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.3126/awadharana.v8i01.70098

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Fourth Edi). SAGE.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/prh.v10i2.65670

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Elnovani Lusiana

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

PRofesi Humas Indexed by:  

  

Editorial Office of PRofesi Humas:

Faculty of Communication Science, Universitas Padjadjaran
Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang, Indonesia 45363
WA: +6282316731181 (Chat Only) Telephone: +62227796954
Faxmile: +62227794122
Email: jurnal.profesihumas.fikom@unpad.ac.id

 
PRofesi Humas Supervised by: View My Stats