EVALUASI KEBIJAKAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM KEJAHATAN KONVENSIONAL DI POLRES BANJAR POLDA KALIMANTAN SELATAN

Eko Sunaryo, R. Widya Setiabudi Sumadinata, Mohammad Benny Alexandri

Abstrak


Globalisasi memicu adanya perubahan perilaku kehidupan masyarakat, Perubahan ini menyertakan pola-pola kejahatan yang bergeser dari pola-pola kejahatan statis tradisional ke pola-pola kejahatan yang dinamis modern salah satunya kejahatan konvensional yang marak terjadi di Indonesia, termasuk wilayah Banjar.  Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui latar kebutuhan, perencanaan, implementasi, dan hasil yang dicapai dari evaluasi kebijakan penegakan hukum kejahatan konvensional di POLRES Banjar.  Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualititatif deskriptif, data bersumber dari data primer dan data sekunder yang dikumpulkan dengan observasi, wawancara dan studi kepustakaan. Teknik analisis yang digunakan mengacu pada UU No 8 tahun 1980 mengenai KUHAP dan Perkap No. 6 tahun 2019 tentang Penyidikan tindak pidana serta menggunakan model Context, Input, Processes dan Product (CIPP). Diperoleh hasil bahwa  dalam tahap evaluasi latar kebutuhan (Content) wilayah Kabupaten Banjar dipengaruhioleh kondisi wilayah, kondisi masyarakat, tingkat kepadatan penduduk, tingkat pendidikan dan tingkat pendapatan masyarakat, pada tahap evaluasi perencanaan POLRES Banjar, masih kurang memadai karna keterbatasan seperti jumlah personel, aspek kompetensi dll. Pada tahap evaluasi implementasi terdapat faktor yang dinilai kurang optimal. Dan pada tahap evaluasi hasil capaian Output yang dicapai yaitu terwujudnya kesiapan Polres Banjar dalam melaksanakan penegakan hukum kejahatan konvesional, terwujudnya kepastian hukum, terwujudnya rasa keadilan dan terwujudnya kepercayaan masyarakat.

 

 

Globalization triggers changes in the behavior of people's lives. This change includes crime patterns that shift from traditional static crime patterns to modern dynamic crime patterns, one of which is conventional crime that is rife in Indonesia, including the Banjar area. The purpose of this study was to determine the background of the needs, planning, implementation, and results achieved from the evaluation of conventional crime law enforcement policies at the Banjar POLRES. This research is a descriptive qualitative research, data sourced from primary data and secondary data collected by observation, interviews and literature study. The analytical technique used refers to Law No. 8 of 1980 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code and Perkap No. 6 of 2019 concerning the investigation of criminal acts and using the Context, Input, Processes and Product (CIPP) model. The results showed that in the evaluation stage the background needs (Content) of the Banjar Regency area was influenced by regional conditions, community conditions, population density levels, education levels and community income levels. etc. At the implementation evaluation stage there are factors that are considered less than optimal. And at the evaluation stage of the results, the output achieved is the realization of the readiness of the Banjar Police in carrying out conventional crime law enforcement, the realization of legal certainty, the realization of a sense of justice and the realization of public trust. 


Kata Kunci


Evaluasi, Kebijakan, Evaluasi Kebijakan, Penegakan Hukum

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Agustino, Leo. Dasar-Dasar Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta, 2008

Alkin, Marvin C., Evaluation Essentials: From A to Z. New York: The Guilford Press, 2011

Anorga, Wiens. Kamus Istilah Ekonomi. Bandung: M2S,1993

Arief, Nawawi Barda. Upaya Non Penal Dalam Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Semarang : Makalah Seminar Kriminologi UI. 1991

Arifin, Zainal. Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Prinsip, Teknik, Prosedur. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2011

Braverman, Marc T., Norman A. Constantine, Jana Kay Slater, Foundations and Evaluation: Contexts and Practices for Effective Philanthropy. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2004

Brynard, Petrus A. Harnessing The Partnership of The Public and Non-State Sectors for Sustainable Development and Good Governance In Africa: Problems and The Way Forward. Zambia: Universiy of Pretoria, 2005

Crabbé, Ann and Pieter Leroy, The Handbook of Environmental Policy Evaluation. USA: Earthscan, 2008

Crocker, Linda dan James Algina, Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Ohio: Cengage Learning, 2008

Daniel L. Stuffebeam. 2002. The CIPP model for Evaluation. Di edit oleh Daniel L. Stufflebeam, George F. Madaus, & Thomas Kellaghan dengan judul Evaluation Models. View Points on Educational and Human Services Evaluation. New York; Kluwer Academic Publisher. Second Edition.

Dale, Barrie G., Managing Quality. 4th Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2003

Davies, Phil. The Magenta Book: Guidance Notes for Policy Evaluation and Analysis. London: Government Chief Social Researcher’s Office, 20034

Dellyana Shant, Konsep Penegakan Hukum, Liberty, 1988, Jakarta, Hlm. 32

Dill, David D., and Maarja Beerkens. Public Policy for Academic Quality: Analyses of Innovative Policy Instruments. New York: Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Dunn, William N. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Edisi Kedua. Terjemah. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2003

Eastwood, Sharon., Anne-Lise Riis Jensen and Anna Jordon, Business Management for the Equine Industry. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2006

Fetterman, David M., and Abraham Wandersman, Empowerment Evaluation Principles in Practice. New York: The Guilford Press, 2005

Fuddin Van Batavia, Under Uncategoriezed. (juli, 2008). Program Evaluasi Dengan Metode CIPP. Didownload Desember, 2011 dari http://fuddin.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/teori-evaluasi-dengan-cipp/

Gertler, Paul J. et.al., Impact Evaluation In Practice. Washington DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, 2011

Gornitzka, Ase., Maurice Kogan, and Alberto Amaral. Reform and Change In Higher Education: Analysing Policy Implementation. Netherland: Springer, 2005

Harris, Lois R., dan Gavin T. L. Brown, Mixing Interview and Questionnaire Methods: Practical Problems in Aligning Data. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, Vol 15, No 1, 2010

Kaplan, Robert M., & Dennis P. Saccuzzo, Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications, and Issues. 6th edition. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth, 2005

Kaufman, Michael. The Theory of Business, Complexity, and Getting Work Done. Walnut Creek: InnovationLabs, LLC

Kempf-Leonard, Kimberly. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement. Volume 2. USA: Elsevier Inc

Khandker, Shahidur R., Gayatri B. Koolwal, Hussain A. Samad, Handbook of Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices. Washington DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 2010

Knox, Alan B., Evaluation for Continuing Education: A Comprehensive Guide To Success. San Fransisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002

Kobarda, John. Assessment Centers: A tool for Selecting Senior Officer Candidates in The Canadian Fire Service. Ontario: London Fire Department, 2004

Mathis, Robert L., and John H. Jackson. Human Resource Management. 12th edition. Mason: Thomson South-Western, 2008

Moleong. Lexy. J. 2001, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.

Moeljatno, 1993, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Surabaya: Putra Harsa.

Nagel, Stuart. Conceptual Theory and Policy Evaluation. New York: Public Administration & Management: An Interactive Journal, 2001

Nugroho, Riant. Public Policy. Jakarta: Alex Media Komputindo, Edisi Revisi, 2009

Nurdin, Diding. http://file.upi.edu/ diakses 06 Desember 2021

Oermann, Marilyn H., and Kathleen B. Gaberson, Evaluation and Testing in Nursing Education. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 2009

Peraturan Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Nomor : Per/15/ M.PAN/7/2008, tentang Pedoman Umum Reformasi Birokrasi

Perkapolri No. : Kep / 37 / X / 2008, tentang Program Akselerasi Transformasi Polri

Perkapolri No. 07 Tahun 2009, tentang Sistem Laporan gangguan keamanan dan ketertiban masyarakat

Perkapolri No. 6 Tahun 2019, tentang Penyidikan Tindak Pidana

Petrosky, Jenna. The German Dual Educational System: Evolving Needs for a Skilled Workforce.

Plug, Erik. and Wim Groot, Apprenticeship Versus Vocational Education: Exemplified by the Dutch Situation. Dutch: University of Amsterdam, 1998

Portal Transport Teaching Material, Policy Formulation and Implementation. 2003. www.eu-portal.net

Purwanto, Iwan. Manajemen Strategi. Bandung: Yrama Widya, 2007

Robbins, Stephen P., and Mary Coulter, Management. 11th Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc., 2012

Sanghi, Seema. The Handbook of Competency Mapping: Understanding, Designing and Implementing Competency Models In Organizations. 2nd edition. New Delhi: Response Books, 2007

Santoso, Purwo., Modul Pembelajaran Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: JPP Fisipol UGM, 2010

Satipto Rahardjo.(1983). Masalah Penegakan Hukum, Sinar Baru, Bandung, hlm. 15

Savenye, Wilhelmina C., and Rhonda S. Robinson. Qualitative Research Issues and Methods: An Introduction For Educational Technologists. www.aect.org

Schalock, Robert L. Outcome Based Evaluation. 2nd Edition. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002

Simamora, Henry. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: STIE YKPN, 2004

Spratt, Kai. Policy Implementation Barriers Analysis: Conceptual Framework and Pilot Test in Three Countries. Washington, DC: Futures Group, Health Policy Initiative (USAID), 2009

Sudjana, Djudju. Evalusi Program Pendidikan Luar Sekolah. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2008

Suharto, Edi. Analisis Kebijakan Publik: Panduan Praktis Mengkasji Masalah dan Kebijakan Sosial. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2010

Suharsimi Arikunto, Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, ed. Revisi, cet. 7, 2007

Stake, Robert E., Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work. New York: The Guilford Press, 2010

Stoner, James A.F., R. Edward Freeman, Daniel R. Gilbert Jr., Manajemen. Jakarta: PT Prenhallindo, 1996

Tachjan, Implementasi Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: AIPI-Puslit KP2W Lemlit Unpad, 2006

Tangkilisan, Hessel Nogi S. Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik : Penjelasan, Analisis & Transformasi Pikiran Nagel. Yogyakarta: Balairung & Co, 2003

Taylor, David., and Susan Balloch. The Politic of Evaluation: Participation and Policy Implementation. Great Britain: The Policy Press, 2005

Terry, George R., and Leslie W. Rue, Dasar-Dasar Manajemen. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2005

Tika, Moh. Pabundu. Metodologi Riset Bisnis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2006

Tilaar dan Nugroho. Kebijakan Pendidikan: Pengantar Untuk Memahami Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Kebijakan Pendidikan sebagai Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2008

Tyson, Shaun. Human Resource Management. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2006

Umar, Husein. Metode Riset Bisnis. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2002

Undang-Undang Kepolisian Nomor 2 tahun 2002

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 tahun 1980 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana

Wahab, Solichin Abdul. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Malang: UPT Penerbitan Universitas Muhammadiyah, 2008

Weaver, Carl F. Can Assessment Centers Eliminate Challenges To The Promotional process ? Florida: Brevard Community College, 2000

Weimer, M. G. Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002. www.spencerstuart.com

Wholey, Joseph S., Harry P. Hatry, Kathryn E. Newcomer, Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Fransisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Wibawa, Samodra. Kebijakan Publik: Proses dan Analisis. Jakarta: Intermedia, 1994

Winarno, Budi. Kebijakan Publik: Teori & Praktek. Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo, 2007

Wirawan, Evaluasi: Teori, Model, Standar, Aplikasi, dan Profesi. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2011

Yin, Robert K., Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York: The Guilford Press, 2011




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/responsive.v5i4.40017

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


RESPONSIVE: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Administrasi, Sosial, Humaniora Dan Kebijakan Publik telah Terindeks Di:

      
  
 
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.