STATE OF THE ART DARI DIGITAL GOVERNANCE DALAM HUBUNGANNYA DENGAN GOOD GOVERNANCE MELALUI ANALISIS VOSVIEWER DAN SYSTEMATIC MAPPING STUDIES (SMS)
Abstrak
Artikel ini bertujuan untuk memetakan Digital Governance yang berkaitan Good Governance dengan menelusuri hasil studi yang pernah ada berdasarkan pemetaan bibliometrik dan pemetaan sistematis terutama pada fokus penelitian, subjek penelitian dan jenis penelitian. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode VOSViewer dan systematic mapping studies (SMS). Strategi pemetaan dilakukan dengan menelusuri 3 database jurnal elektronik yaitu pada Scopus, Emerald dan Sage journals Publication. Terdapat 360 artikel yang dipetakan VOSViewer dan sebanyak 598 artikel dipetakan dan setelah dilakukan screening berhasil didapatkan 31 artikel. Temuan pada pemetaan VOSVIewer dan SMS ini akan dapat membantu peneliti-peneliti lain untuk merencanakan penelitian lebih lanjut, karena penelitian ini berpotensi untuk menemukan kesenjangan penelitian (research gap). Hasil dari penelitian ini menemukan bahwa masih ada beberapa kajian penelitian yang dapat berpotensi menjadi novelty dan memberikan kontribusi baru bagi penelitian Digital Governance dan Good Governance. Dari hasil pemetaan ditemukan bahwa ada penelitian yang menghubungkan secara langsung antara Digital Governance dan Good Governance masih belum banyak. Begitupun juga dengan jenis dan metode penelitian yang digunakan. Metode mix method dan case study masih sedikit dipakai. Selain itu ada celah pada jenis penelitian evaluation research dengan metode penelitian kualitatif masih belum ada peneliti yang melakukan. Hal ini merupakan research gap dan berpeluang menjadi novelty dalam sebuah penelitian.
The purpose of this article is to mapping the concept Digital Governance related to Good Governance by tracing the results of existing studies based on bibliometric mapping and systematic mapping, especially on research focus, research subjects and types of research. This study uses the VOSViewer method and systematic mapping studies (SMS). The mapping strategy was carried out by tracing 3 databases of electronic journals namely Scopus, Emerald and Sage journals Publications. There were 360 articles mapped by VOSViewer and as many as 598 articles were mapped and after screening, 31 articles were obtained. The findings on the VOSVIewer and SMS mapping able to he researchers to plan further research, because this research has the potential to find a research gap. The results of this study found that there are still several research studies that have the potential to become novelties and make new contributions to Digital Governance and Good Governance research. From the results of the mapping rsearcher’s founds that there were not much research directly linking Digital Governance and Good Governance. Likewise with the type and method of research used. Mix method and case study methods are still rarely used. In addition, there is a gap in the type of do evaluation research with qualitative research methods, but there are still no researchers who have conducted it. This is a research gap and has the opportunity to become novelty in a study.
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Afriana, W., Susetiyana, H., Maharani, O., & Azis, H. A. (2020). E-Government Effectiveness in Combating. CosmoGov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 6(01), 28–42.
Algazo, F. A., Ibrahim, S., & Yusoff, W. S. (2021). Digital Governance Emergence and Importance. Journal of Information System and Technology Management, 6(24), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.35631/jistm.624003
Aliyu, M. B. (2017). American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER) 2015. American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), 6(7), 267–279.
Banaeianjahromi, N., & Smolander, K. (2016). What do we know about the role of enterprise architecture in enterprise integration? A systematic mapping study. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29(1), 140–164.
Bewa Dangu Wole, Anisa Purwaningsih, C. S. (2021). Analisis Kebijakan Smart City Pada Among Tani untuk Menumbuhkan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Good Governance. Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik (JISoP), 3(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.33474/jisop.v3i1.9344
Bimasakti, F. (2017). Tatakelola Pemerintahan Berbasis Electronic Government Di Kabupaten Semarang. Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 6(3), 1–18.
Botchway, F. N. (2001). Good Governance: the Old, the New, the Principle, and the Elements. Florida Journal Of International Law, 1(November), 2–40.
Choi, T., & Chandler, S. M. (2020). Knowledge vacuum: An organizational learning dynamic of how e-government innovations fail. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101416
Chung, C. S., Choi, H., & Cho, Y. (2022). Analysis of Digital Governance Transition in South Korea: Focusing on the Leadership of the President for Government Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010002
Erkut, B. (2020). From digital government to digital governance: Are we there yet? Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030860
Fauzi, A. H., Rizal, M., & Arifianti, R. (2019). Corporate Entrepreneurship In SMEs : A Systematic Mapping Study. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 2(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v2i1.21575
Gao, X., & Lee, J. (2017). E-government services and social media adoption: Experience of small local governments in Nebraska state. Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 627–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.005
Gauld, R. (2006). E-government: what is it, and will it transform government? Policy Quarterly, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v2i2.4193
Grönlund, Å., & Horan, T. A. (2005). Introducing e-Gov: History, Definitions, and Issues. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15(January). https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01539
Gurbuz, H. G., & Tekinerdogan, B. (2018). Model-based testing for software safety: a systematic mapping study. Software Quality Journal, 26(4), 1327–1372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-017-9386-2
He, Q., Wang, G., Luo, L., Shi, Q., Xie, J., & Meng, X. (2017). Mapping the managerial areas of Building Information Modeling (BIM) using scientometric analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 35(4), 670–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.001
Ismail, Fathonih, A., Prabowo, H., Hartati, S., & Redjeki, F. (2020). Transparency and corruption: Does E-government effective to combat corruption? International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(4), 5396–5404. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I4/PR201636
Kettl, D. F. (2015). The job of government: Interweaving public functions and private hands. Public Administration Review, 75(2), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12336
Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Brereton, O. P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., & Linkman, S. (2010). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering-A tertiary study. Information and Software Technology, 52(8), 792–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.006
McBride, K. (2019). Sailing towards digitalization when it doesn’t make cents? Analysing the Faroe Islands’ new digital governance trajectory. Island Studies Journal, 14(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.93
Musianto, L. S. (2002). Perbedaan Pendekatan Kuantitatif Dengan Pendekatan Kualitatif Dalam Metode Penelitian. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 4(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.9744/jmk.4.2.pp.123-136
Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006
Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008). Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE 2008, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/ease2008.8
Petersen, K., Vakkalanka, S., & Kuzniarz, L. (2015). Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Information and Software Technology, 64, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007
Purnomo, M., Maulana, Y. S., Sugiartana, & Tjahjono, E. (2020). State Of The Art Of Crowdfunding In Entrepreneurial Finance Context. AdBspreneur:Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Administrasi Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 5(1), 89–116.
Rahim, A. (2019). Governance and Good Governance-A Conceptual Perspective. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 9(3), 133. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v9i3.15417
Solihah, R., Djuyandi, Y., Witianti, S., & Herdiansah, A. G. (2017). The importance of good governance implementation in the legislative institutions. Advanced Science Letters, 23(5), 4820–4823. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.8917
Suwandi, I., Arifianti, R., & Rizal, M. (2019). Pelaksanaan Prinsip-Prinsip Good Corporate Governance (GCG) PADA PT. Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (JASINDO). Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 2(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v2i1.21559
Suwandi, I., Raharja, S. J., & Tahir. (2021). Relationship Between Entrepreneurial Intention And Knowledge Acqusition Through The Systematic Mapping Study (SMS) Method. JournalNX - AMultidisciplinary Peer Reviewed Journal, 7(1), 187–197.
Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Wieringa, R., Maiden, N., Mead, N., & Rolland, C. (2006). Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: A proposal and a discussion. Requirements Engineering, 11(1), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-005-0021-6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/responsive.v5i3.44093
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.