KEADAAN PEMENUHAN HAK PENDIDIKAN ANAK REMAJA PASCA REUNIFIKASI
Abstrak
ABSTRACT
Family is the first and utmost place for child rights fulfilment. Commonly, family is the place to guarantee the development and child rights fulfilment, however, many children are being placed in orphanages in order for the children to acquire their rights of education. Children reside in orphanages are vulnerable of discrimination. In order to protect the vulnerable children, Save the Children with its program of Child and Family Support Center (PDAK) returning children residing in orphanages into their families, known as reunification, to receive family based care and still acquiring their rights including rights of education. Sequential mixed of quantitative and qualitative approach is used in this research. Data is collected from children and parents involved with reunification process and child care. The focus of this research is the fulfillment of child rights to develop and survival, mainly rights of education.
The result shows that after reunification, one youth is not pursuing his study and decided to work because his father could not afford the educational expenses. The result also found that although the parents are economically deprived, but no youth have return to orphanages to receive institution based care. The research found strength of parent and resiliency of children thus keeping the children reside in their family and receive family based care. The strength of parent and child resilience exists because of social work support through case management model of PDAK Save the Children. The social workers have assisted the parents to gain access needed in order for them to fulfill the child rights. The social workers also assist and provide understanding to the children about their parents’ condition which then resulting in child resilience. Case management model serves as model for direct services for children and their families in keeping the continuity of family based care received by children after reunification. With this model, service providers will be able to synergized the policies and programs of social insurance planned and implemented by the government thus overcoming the limited access of parents to fulfill their children’s rights.
Kata Kunci
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Barth, R.P., Weigensberg, E.C. Fisher, P.A., Fetrow, B., & Green, R.L. (2007). Reentry of elementary aged children following reunification from foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, hlm. 353-364.
Butler, I. & Roberts. G. (2004). Social Work with Children and Families. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Carnochan, S., Rizik-Baer, D. & Austin, M.J. (2013). Preventing Re-Entry to Foster Care. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 10:3, 196-209.
Carl, C.D., Paramo, M.C.D., Rosen, D. & Sobo. E.J. (2007). The Rights of Children. Public Policy Statement. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, hlm. 234.
Child Welfare League of America. (2002). Family Reunification. Washington DC, Research Roundup.
Clifton, J. & Hodgson. D. (1997). Rethinking practice through a children’s rights perspective. Dalam C. Cannan & C. Warren (Eds) Social Action with Children and Families: A community development approach to child and family welfare, hlm. 43-65. London: Routledge.
Cruz, W. (2009). Extended services post reunification to enhance parent-child attachments: A grant Proposal. California State University, Long Beach.
DuBois, B. & Miley, K. (2010). Social Work: An Empowering Profession 6th ed. Boston: Pearson Education.
Durrant, J. (2007). Positive Discipline. Bangkok: Save the Children Sweden South East Asia and the Pacific.
Erikson, E.H. (1963). The Childhood and Society. London: Paladin Grafton Books.
Fernandez, A.M. (2012). Family Reunification: Aftercare support that preserves the family unit. Saint Mary’s College of California.
Fraser, M.W., Walton, E., Lewis, R.E., Pecora, P.J., & Walton, W.K. (1996). An experiment in family reunification: Correlations of outcomes at one-year follow up. Children and Youth Services Review, 18, hlm. 335-361.
Hutchinson, E.D. (2003a). Dimensions of Human Behavior: The Changing Life Course 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
Ife, J. (2001). Human Rights and Social Work: Towards Rights-Based Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kimberlin, S.E., Anthony, E.K., & Austin, M.J. (2009). Re-entering foster care: Trends, evidence, and implications. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, hlm. 471-481.
Lau, AS., Litrownik, AJ., Newton, RR.,Landsverk, J. (2003). Going Home: The Complex Effects of Reunification on Internalizing Problems Among Children in Foster Care. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, New York:. Vol. 31, Edisi 4; pg. 345.
Lestari, S. (2012). Psikologi Keluarga: Penanaman Nilai dan Penanganan Konflik dalam Keluarga. Jakarta: Kencana.
McIntosh, M.M. (2002). Barriers to reunification in the child welfare system: An analysis of kinship and non-kinship placement. California State University, Long Beach.
Maluccio, A., Pine, B. &Warsh, R. (1994). Protecting Children by Preserving their families. Children and Youth Services Review, 16(5/6), 295-307. Maluccio, A.N., Abramczyk, L.W., & Thomlison, B. (1996). Family reunification of children in out-of-home care: Research perspectives. Children and Youth Services Review, 18, hlm. 287-305. Miller, K.A., Fisher, P.A., Fetrow, B. & Jordan, K. (2006). Trouble on the journey home: Reunification failures in foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, hlm. 260-274.
Neuman, W.L. (2004). Basics of Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Pearson Education.
Pringle, M.K. (1975). The Needs of Children. London: Hutchinson.
Roscoe, A. (2011). International Development Policy and Practice: The Translation of a Children’s Rights-Based Approach. Carleton University, Ontario.
Santrock, J.W. (2007). A Topical Approach to Life Span Development, 3rd ed. Boston: McGraw Hill.
Saunders-Adams, S.M. (2011). Reunification and Reentry in Child Welfare: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. The Ohio State University, Ohio.
Setiono, K. (2009). Psikologi Perkembangan. Bandung: Widya Padjadjaran.
Shaw, T. (2006). Re-entry into foster care system after reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, hlm. 1375-1390.
Steigner. L.E. (2007). Family Preservation, Reunification and Out-of-Home Care: Informing Child Welfare Policy. Dissertation. Antioch University New England, Keene, New Hampshire.
Sudrajat, T. & Martin, F. (2007). Someone That Matters: The Quality of Care in Childcare Institutions in Indonesia. Jakarta: Save the Children Indonesia.
Talbot, E.P. (2005). Successful Family Reunification: Looking at the Decision-Making Process. Paper presented at NACSW Convention, Michigan.
Talbot, E.P. (2007). Successful Family Reunification: The Contribution of Social Work Theory in the Provision of Services and Decision making. Illinois Child Welfare, Vol 3 Number 1 & 2.
Tausig, H.N., Clyman, R.B. & Landsverk, J. (2001). Children Who Return Home From Foster Care: A 6-Year Prospective Study of Behavioral Health Outcomes in Adolescence. Pediatrics, Vol. 108 No. 1, hlm. 1-7.
Terling, T. (1999). The efficacy of family reunification practices: Reentry rates and correlates of reentry for abused and neglected children reunited with their families. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, hlm. 1359-1370.
Thomas, M., Chenot,D., & Reifel, B. (2005). A Resilience-Based Model of Reunification and Reentry: Implications for Out-of-Home Care Services. Families in Society: Apr-Jun 2005; 86, 2, 235-243.
Thornton, A (Ed). (2001). The Well-Being of Children and Families. USA: The University of Michigan Press.
Wulczyn, F. (2004). Family Reunification. The Future of Children, vol. 14, iss.1, Winter.
Yusuf, S. (2011). Psikologi Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/share.v7i2.15687
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
21.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.