Paparan Media Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Persepsi Publik

Syamin Sofea Saifullizam, Nurshafiqah Yusrina Sharul Nizam, Nurliyana Ismail, Nurul Syazzahirah Zainuddin, Nurin Khairina Zalman Iswandi, Aini Faezah Ramlan, Caroline Paskarina

Abstract

ABSTRAK

Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi konsumsi media sebagai fenomena yang sangat penting dengan menyelidiki teori pembingkaian politik dan teori penetapan agenda. Studi ini didasarkan pada data sekunder dari artikel yang ditinjau sejawat. Tujuannya adalah untuk menganalisis bagaimana visibilitas, konstruksi cerita, dan dominasi algoritmik media memengaruhi wacana politik dan keterlibatan publik. Ditemukan bahwa paparan digital secara signifikan memengaruhi bagaimana publik memprioritaskan isu sebelum memberikan penjelasan atau definisi apa pun. Penelitian ini menyoroti bahwa visibilitas dalam masyarakat kontemporer tidak lagi terbatas pada jurnalisme, karena pengguna dan algoritme secara signifikan mendikte apa yang terlihat dan penting, menyesuaikan keunggulan informasi yang disajikan secara digital. Studi ini berpendapat bahwa stimulasi algoritmik mengubah media menjadi kekuatan yang kuat yang beroperasi berdasarkan identitas, di mana ruang lingkup dan sumber daya politik membentuk legitimasi sistematis dan pemahaman publik tentang ruang lingkup kebijakan yang disampaikan melalui media massa. Berfokus pada dampak algoritma dan politik yang semakin meningkat pada media sosial, penelitian ini menekankan perlunya tanggung jawab dan integritas yang lebih besar dari media dan pengembangan teoritis untuk mengatasi logika kontrol yang tidak diatur.

Kata Kunci: Paparan Media, Persepsi Publik, Teori Pembingkaian, Teori Agenda-Setting

 

ABSTRACT 

This research explores media consumption as a phenomenon of significant importance by investigating the political framing theory and agenda-setting theory. The study is based on secondary data from peer-reviewed articles. It aims to analyze how media outlets' visibility, story construction, and algorithmic dominance impact political and public engagement discourse. It was found that digital exposure significantly influences how the public prioritizes issues before rendering any explanation or definition. The research highlights that visibility in contemporary society is no longer confined to journalism, as users and algorithms significantly dictate what is visible and critical, customizing the superiority of digitally presented information. The study argues that algorithmic stimulation transforms media into a powerful force operating on identity, where political scope and resources shape systematic legitimacy and public understanding of policy scope delivered through mass media. Focusing on the growing impact of algorithms and politics on social media, the research emphasizes the need for greater responsibility and integrity from the media and theoretical development to address the unregulated logic of control.

Keywords: Media Exposure, Public Perception, Framing Theory, Agenda-Setting Theory

 

Keywords

media exposure, public perception, framing theory, agenda-setting theory

References

Amsalem, E., Zoizner, A., Sheafer, T., Walgrave, S., & Loewen, P. J. (2020). The Effect of Politicians’ Personality on Their Media Visibility. Communication Research, 47(7), 1079-1102.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218758084

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press.

Bucher, T. (2018). If...Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cantarella, M., Fraccaroli, N., & Volpe, R. (2023). Does fake news affect voting behavior? Research Policy, 52(1), 104628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104628

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Farah, H. (2023, September 15). Social media firms are “unprepared to tackle misinformation” during global elections. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/sep/1 5/social-media-firms-not-ready-to-tackle-misinf ormation-during-global-elections

Facciani, M., Idris, I., & Weninger, T. (2024). Comparison of News Literacy, Media Consumption, and Trust Between Indonesia and Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.20885/asjmc.vol7.iss2.art2

Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. Edited by C. Gordon. New York: Pantheon Books.

Gillespie, T. (2014). "The Relevance of Algorithms." Pp. 167–194 in Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, edited by T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski, and K. Foot. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT Press.

Intyaswati, D., Maryani, E., Sugiana, D., & Venus, A. (2021). Using Media for Voting Decision among First-time Voter College Students in West Java, Indonesia. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(1), 327. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0028

Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. University of Chicago Press.

Jonkman, J. G. F., Boukes, M., Vliegenthart, R., & Verhoeven, P. (2019). Buffering Negative News: Individual-level Effects of Company Visibility, Tone, and Pre-existing Attitudes on Corporate Reputation. Mass Communication and Society, 23(2), 272–296.

https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2019.1694155

Kleinnijenhuis, J., van Hoof, A. M., & van Atteveldt, W. (2019). The combined effects of mass media and social media on political perceptions and preferences. Journal of Communication, 69(6), 650–673. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz038

Kruikemeier, S., Gattermann, K., & Vliegenthart, R. (2018). Understanding the dynamics of politicians’ visibility in traditional and social media. The Information Society, 34(4), 215–228.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2018.1463334

Ling, S., & Huey. (2023). EXPLORING POLITICAL PARTICIPATION OF MALAY FIRST-TIME VOTERS AND THE TIKTOK ROLE IN MALAYSIA.

http://eprints.utar.edu.my/5280/1/fyp_JR_2023_ LSH.pdf

Mateus, S. (2017). Visibility is a key concept in Communication and Media Studies. Estudos Em Comunicação, 25s, 109–124. https://doi.org/10.20287/ec.n25.v2.a08

Maulandari, A., Yustitia, S., & Susilo, M. (n.d.). MASS MEDIA AND IMAGE OF POLITICAL

ACTORS. Retrieved June 5, 2024, from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/413 052-mass-media-and-image-of-political-actors-e 6c9f7d1.pdf

McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

McCombs, M., & Reynolds, A. (2002). News Influence on Our Pictures of the World. In Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (2nd ed., pp. 1–18). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Napoli, Philip M. 2014. "Automated Media: Algorithmic Media Production and the Case of the Sports Writing Robot." Television & New Media 15(6): 511–527. doi:10.1177/1527476414537043.

Nechushtai, E., & Seth C. Lewis. (2019). "What Kind of News Gatekeepers Do We Want Algorithms to Be?" Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 96(3):754–771. doi:10.1177/1077699018804504.

Neumayer, C., Rossi, L., & Struthers, D. M. (2021). Invisible Data: A Framework for Understanding Visibility Processes in Social Media Data. Social Media + Society, 7(1), 205630512098447.

https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984472

O’Brien, M., & Anderson, M. (2020, November 5). Did social media counter election misinformation? AP News. https://apnews.com/article/social-media-election

-misinformation-632a5d93a6cc3ff37311a641d8 6bf5a1

Pfister, R., Schwarz, K. A., Holzmann, P., Reis, M., Yogeeswaran, K., & Kunde, W. (2023).

Headlines win elections: Mere exposure to fictitious news media alters voting behavior. PloS one, 18(8), e0289341.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289341

Philp, R. (2024, April 17). How the media in Taiwan has adapted to combat electoral disinformation. International Journalists’ Network; International Center for Journalists. https://ijnet.org/en/story/how-media-taiwan-has- adapted-combat-electoral-disinformation

Peña‐Martel, D., Pérez‐Alemán, J., & Santana‐Martín, D. J. (2021). Media visibility and board gender diversity. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12382

Rasťo Kužel MONITORING OF MEDIA COVERAGE OF ELECTIONS (n.d.-a). https://rm.coe.int/monitoring-of-media-coverage

-of-elections-toolkit-for-civil-society-or/1680a06 bc6

Rutenberg, J. (2016, November 7). Media’s Next Challenge: Overcoming the Threat of Fake News. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/07/business/ media/medias-next-challenge-overcoming-the-th reat-of-fake-news

Tufekci, Z. (2015). "Algorithmic Harms Beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent Challenges of Computational Agency." Colorado Technology Law Journal 13(2):203–218.

United States Democracy Center. (2023, August 1). Social Media Policies: Mis/Disinformation, Threats, and Harassment. https://statesuniteddemocracy.org/resources/soci al-media-policies/

Van Remoortere, A., & Vliegenthart, R. (2023). The influence of mass media on the popularity of politicians. Party Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068823118796

Wolfe, M., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2013). A failure to communicate: Agenda setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication, 30(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737419

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.