MEMAHAMI KINERJA STARTUP : STUDI PADA STARTUP DI JAWA BARAT
Abstrak
One characteristics of startups compared to conventional MSMEs is the use of data. Utilization of data starts from business intelligence & analytics. The knowledge generated together with other dynamic capabilities will support each other in creating value to improve startup business performance. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between business intelligence & analytics, absorptive capacity, innovation ambiance, and entrepreneurial orientation towards startup business performance.Data obtained by survey distributed by email to 194 startups in West Java. PLS-SEM was used to estimate model in this study. We propose and test a model that integrates the domains of dynamic capability, knowledge management, and entrepreneurship. The main findings show that the use of BI&A has a positive association with the ability to balance competitive innovation activities, supported by entrepreneurial orientation, in turn improving startup performance.This study integrates insights gained from the application of IT value creation and dynamic capabilities perspectives to explain how the use of BI&A is associated with the ambidexterity of innovation and business performance and through entrepreneurial orientation.
Salah satu ciri startup dibandingkan UMKM konvensional adalah penggunaan data. Pemanfaatan data dimulai dari business intelligence & analytics. Pengetahuan yang dihasilkan bersama dengan kapabilitas dinamis lainnya akan saling mendukung dalam menciptakan nilai guna meningkatkan kinerja bisnis startup. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui hubungan antara business intelligence & analytics, absorptive capacity, innovation ambidexterity, dan entrepreneurial orientation terhadap kinerja bisnis startup. Data didapatkan dari survei yang disebarkan melalui email kepada 194 startup di Jawa Barat. PLS-SEM digunakan untuk mengestimasi model dalam penelitian ini. Kami menguji model yang mengintegrasikan domain dynamic capabilities, manajemen pengetahuan, dan kewirausahaan. Temuan utama menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan BI&A memiliki hubungan positif dengan kemampuan mengimbangi aktivitas inovasi kompetitif, didukung oleh orientasi kewirausahaan, yang pada gilirannya meningkatkan kinerja startup. Studi ini mengintegrasikan wawasan yang diperoleh dari penerapan perspektif penciptaan nilai TI dan kapabilitas dinamis untuk menjelaskan bagaimana penggunaan BI&A dikaitkan dengan innovation ambidexterity dan kinerja bisnis dan melalui orientasi kewirausahaan.
Kata Kunci
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Abbasi, A., Sarker, S., & Chiang, R. H. L. (2016). Big data research in information systems: Toward an inclusive research agenda. In Journal of the Association for Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00423
Agarwal, R., & Dhar, V. (2014). Big data, data science, and analytics: The opportunity and challenge for IS research. Information Systems Research, 25(3), 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0546
Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance. Strategic Management Journal.
Alaskar, T., & Poulis, E. (2015). Business Intelligence Capabilities and Implementation Strategies. International Journal of Global Business.
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.61
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.9416096
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2015). 2013 Decade Award invited article reflections on the 2013 Decade Award - “Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited” ten years later. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0042
Božič, K., & Dimovski, V. (2019a). Business intelligence and analytics for value creation: The role of absorptive capacity. International Journal of Information Management, 46(February 2018), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.020
Božič, K., & Dimovski, V. (2019b). Business intelligence and analytics use, innovation ambidexterity, and firm performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(4), 101578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.101578
Calantone, R. J., Tamer, C. S., & Yushan, Z. (2004). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 515 citation_lastpage=524.
Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0426
Caseiro, N., & Coelho, A. (2018). Business intelligence and competitiveness: the mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Competitiveness Review, 28(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-09-2016-0054
Caseiro, N., & Coelho, A. (2019). The influence of Business Intelligence capacity, network learning and innovativeness on startups performance. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 4(3), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.009
Chen, D. Q., Preston, D. S., & Swink, M. (2015). How the use of big data analytics affects value creation in supply chain management. Journal of Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2015.1138364
Chen, H., H.L.Chiang, R., & C. Storey, V. (2018). Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data To Big Impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165–1188. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41703503
Chen, Y. C., Li, P. C., & Evans, K. R. (2012). Effects of interaction and entrepreneurial orientation on organizational performance: Insights into market driven and market driving. Industrial Marketing Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.01.017
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In Modern methods for business research.
Chuang, S. H. (2004). A resource-based perspective on knowledge management capability and competitive advantage: An empirical investigation. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2004.05.008
Clausen, T., & Korneliussen, T. (2012). The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and speed to the market: The case of incubator firms in Norway. Technovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.05.004
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Covin, J. G., & Miller, D. (2014). International Entrepreneurial Orientation: Conceptual Considerations, Research Themes, Measurement Issues, and Future Research Directions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12027
Daily Social; DSResearch. (2020). Scaling Through Technology Democratization: Startup Report 2019. March.
Davenport, T. H., Barth, P., & Bean, R. (2012). How ‘Big Data’ Is Different. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 54 (1). https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-big-data-is-different/
Davidsson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.002
De Clercq, D., Dimov, D., & Thongpapanl, N. T. (2013). Organizational Social Capital, Formalization, and Internal Knowledge Sharing in Entrepreneurial Orientation Formation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12021
Dhliwayo, S. (2014). Entrepreneurship and Competitive Strategy: An Integrative Approach. Journal of Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971355713513356
Easterby-Smith, M., & Prieto, I. M. (2008). Dynamic capabilities and knowledge management: An integrative role for learning? In British Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00543.x
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-03-2018-0060
Elbashir, M. Z., Collier, P. A., & Sutton, S. G. (2011). The role of organizational absorptive capacity in strategic use of business intelligence to support integrated management control systems. Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000010
Fabrizio, K. R. (2009). Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.023
Fern, M. J., Cardinal, L. B., & O’Neill, H. M. (2012). The genesis of strategy in new ventures: Escaping the constraints of founder and team knowledge. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1944
Fink, L., Yogev, N., & Even, A. (2017). Business intelligence and organizational learning: An empirical investigation of value creation processes. Information and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.03.009
Flatten, T. C., Engelen, A., Zahra, S. A., & Brettel, M. (2011). A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2010.11.002
Forés, B., & Camisón, C. (2016). Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size? Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.006
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Foss, N. J., Laursen, K., & Pedersen, T. (2011). Linking customer interaction and innovation: The mediating role of new organizational practices. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0584
Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01605
Gerschewski, S., & Xiao, S. S. (2015). Beyond financial indicators: AN assessment of the measurement of performance for international new ventures. International Business Review, 24(4), 615–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.11.003
Ghemawat, P., & Ricart Costa, J. E. I. (1993). The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141007
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159573
Global Entrepreneurship Network. (2020). The Global Startup Ecosystem Report 2020 (GSER2020). https://startupgenome.com/reports/gser2020
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083026
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Second Edition. In California: Sage.
Hannula, M., & Pirttimaki, V. (2003). Business intelligence empirical study on the top 50 Finnish companies.
He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. In Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2009). Understanding dynamic capabilities: Progress along a developmental path. In Strategic Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127008100133
Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, H. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technoHenderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, H. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 472–484. http://doi.org/10.1147/sj.382.0472log. IBM Systems Journal.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
Herath, H. M. A., & Mahmood, R. (2014). Strategic orientations and SME performance: Moderating effect of absorptive capacity of the firm. Asian Social Science. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n13p95
Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M., & ... (2001). Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management …. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/smj.196
Holsapple, C., Lee-Post, A., & Pakath, R. (2014). A unified foundation for business analytics. Decision Support Systems, 64, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.05.013
Hughes, M., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Marketing Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.04.003
Ireland, R. D. (2001). Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth. Academy of Management Executive. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2001.4251393
Jansen, J. J. P., George, G., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00775.x
Jansen, J. J. P., Tempelaar, M. P., van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0415
Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
Johnston, S. (2018). Largest companies 2008 vs. 2018, a lot has changed. Milford Asset Management Limited. Mildford Website, 1, 18–22. https://milfordasset.com/insights/largest-companies-2008-vs-2018-lot-changed
Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069433
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Kogut & Udo Zander. 1992. Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology. Organization Science.
Koryak, O., Mole, K. F., Lockett, A., Hayton, J. C., Ucbasaran, D., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2015). Entrepreneurial leadership, capabilities and firm growth. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614558315
Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.22527456
LaValle, S., Lesser, E., Shockley, R., Hopkins, M. S., & Kruschwitz, N. (2011). LaValle, Steve, et al. 2011 Big Data, analytics and the path from insights to value. MIT Sloan Management Review.
Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. (2005). Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation: A multidimensional perspective. Academy of Management 2005 Annual Meeting: A New Vision of Management in the 21st Century, AOM 2005. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2005.18778391
Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. In Journal of Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045756
Leonard, D., & Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge. In Boston: Harvard Business School.
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
Lucas, H. C., & Goh, J. M. (2009). Disruptive technology: How Kodak missed the digital photography revolution. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2009.01.002
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review. https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Maune, A. (2014). Competitive intelligence and firm competitiveness: An overview. Corporate Ownership and Control, 12(1CONT6), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i1c6p1
Meeus, M. T. H., Oerlemans, L. A. G., & Hage, J. (2001). Patterns of interactive learning in a high-tech region. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084060102200106
Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of it business value. In MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148636
Morrison, A. (2006). A contextualisation of entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550610679159
Negash, S., & Gray, P. (2008). Business Intelligence Handbook on Decision Support Sytem 2. In Handbook on Decision Support Sytem 2 (pp. 72–80). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-931-1.ch008
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
Olszak, C. M. (2014). Towards an understanding business intelligence. A dynamic capability-based framework for Business Intelligence. 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, FedCSIS 2014, 2, 1103–1110. https://doi.org/10.15439/2014F68
Pellissier, R., & Nenzhelele, T. E. (2013). Towards a universal definition of competitive intelligence. SA Journal of Information Management, 15(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v15i2.559
Powell, T. C., & Dent-Micallef, A. (1997). Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5<375::AID-SMJ876>3.0.CO;2-7
Prajogo, D. I. (2016). The strategic fit between innovation strategies and business environment in delivering business performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.037
Ravichandran, T., & Lertwongsatien, C. (2005). Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource-based perspective. In Journal of Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2005.11045820
Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.001
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). Editor’s comments: A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in “MIS Quarterly.” Journal of Education for Business.
Roberts, N., Galluch, P. S., Dinger, M., & Grover, V. (2012). Absorptive capacity and information systems research: Review, synthesis, and directions for future research. In MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703470
Rothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0404
Sam Ransbotham, D. K. and P. K. P. (2016). Beyond the Hype: The Hard Work Behind Analytics Success. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 57 (3). https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/the-hard-work-behind-data-analytics-strategy/
Sangari, M. S., & Razmi, J. (2015). Business intelligence competence, agile capabilities, and agile performance in supply chain An empirical study. International Journal of Logistics Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-01-2013-0012
Sari, S. M., Yunizar, & Sartika, D. (2020). DETERMINANTS OF MSME’S COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: DO DIGITAL COMPETENCY AND ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION MATTER? AdBispreneur : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Administrasi Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 5(1), 63–72.
Schryen, G. (2013). Revisiting IS business value research: What we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there. In European Journal of Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.45
Shamsie, J., Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2000). Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666992
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.2791611
Shollo, A., & Galliers, R. D. (2016). Towards an understanding of the role of business intelligence systems in organisational knowing. Information Systems Journal, 26(4), 339–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12071
Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00828.x
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. In Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.23466005
Smart, D. T., & Conant, J. S. (2011). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Distinctive Marketing Competencies And Organizational Performance. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR). https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v10i3.5921
Smith, K. G., Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2005). Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.16928421
Smith, W., & Lewis, M. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0223
Soh, C., & Markus, M. L. (1995). How IT Creates Business Value: A Process Theory Synthesis. ICIS 1995 Proceedings.
Stam, W., & Elfring, T. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra-and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal. https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/AMJ.2008.30744031
Startup Genome. (2019). Global Startup Ecosystem Report 2019.
Startupblink. (2020). Startup Ecosystem Rankings 2020. https://www.startupblink.com/blog/startupblink/
Stubbs, E. (2014). Big data, Big innovation: Enabling competitive differentiation through business analytics. New Zealand Management.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Todorova, G., & Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. In Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275513
Trieu, V. H. (2017). Getting value from Business Intelligence systems: A review and research agenda. Decision Support Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2016.09.019
Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position. The Academy of Management Journal Academy of Management Journal.
Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., Volberda, H. W., & De Boer, M. (1999). Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.551
Wamba, S. F., Gunasekaran, A., Akter, S., Ren, S. J. fan, Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2017). Big data analytics and firm performance: Effects of dynamic capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 70, 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.009
Wanda, P., & Stian, S. (2015). The Secret of my Success: An exploratory study of Business Intelligence management in the Norwegian Industry. Procedia Computer Science, 64(1877), 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.486
Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. In International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00201.x
Wang, S., Yeoh, W., Richards, G., Wong, S. F., & Chang, Y. (2019). Harnessing business analytics value through organizational absorptive capacity. Information and Management, 56(7), 103152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.02.007
Wiens, J., & Jackson, C. (2015). The importance of young firms for economic growth, URL: www.goo.gl/Wg1dFQ, date accessed: 2017-07-02.
Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307–1314. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.360
Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10 SPEC ISS.), 991–995. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.318
Wixom, B., & Watson, H. (2010). The BI-Based Organization. International Journal of Business Intelligence Research. https://doi.org/10.4018/jbir.2010071702
Wu, L., Wang, C., & Chen, C. (2008). Competitiveness during the Growth Stage : A Study of Taiwanese High-Tech Ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 529–549.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/adbispreneur.v5i3.30916
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.