ANALYSIS OF CIVIL SOCIETY CIVIC CULTURE IN REALIZING THE QUALITY OF THE 2024 ELECTION
Abstract
The quality of elections in emerging democracies is increasingly understood as a social outcome rather than a purely procedural achievement. This study examines how civic culture within civil society shapes public perceptions of the quality of the 2024 General Election in Lampung Province, Indonesia. Drawing on Civic Culture Theory, the study analyzes the configuration of civil society actors, civic orientations, and their implications for electoral quality at the subnational level. The research adopts a qualitative approach with a mixed-methods logic based on triangulation, combining in-depth interviews with civil society actors, election stakeholders, and observers, alongside a descriptive public opinion survey. The findings reveal an ambivalent role of civil society in the electoral process. Although procedural awareness and voter participation are high, evaluative civic orientations remain weak, reflected in the normalization of money politics and the dominance of symbolic and affective political mobilization. Public deliberation is fragmented and largely confined to elite spaces, resulting in elections perceived as procedurally orderly but substantively contested. This study contributes by contextualizing Civic Culture Theory and demonstrating that electoral quality shaped by asymmetrical civic development. Limited to Lampung provincial case, this study recommends comparative and longitudinal research to further examine civic culture and electoral legitimacy.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (2015). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations.
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J. S., Mansbridge, J., & Warren, M. E. (2018). The Oxford handbook of deliberative democracy. Oxford University Press.
Barenschot, W., & Purba, D. (2014, July 4). Pemilu Lampung yang berlapis gula - Inside Indonesia: The peoples and cultures of Indonesia. Https://Www.Insideindonesia.Org/Editions/Edition-117-Jul-Sep-2014/Pemilu-Lampung-Yang-Berlapis-Gula. https://www.insideindonesia.org/editions/edition-117-jul-sep-2014/pemilu-lampung-yang-berlapis-gula
Barrett, M., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2017). Political and civic engagement and participation: Towards an integrative perspective. In Framing civic engagement, political participation and active citizenship in Europe (pp. 5–28). Routledge.
Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M. (2021). Democracy and the quality of government. The Oxford Handbook of the Quality of Government, 182–209.
Bayo, L. N., Santoso, P., & Samadhi, W. P. (2018). Rezim lokal di Indonesia: memaknai ulang demokrasi kita. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Berenschot, W., & Aspinall, E. (2022). How clientelism varies: Comparing patronage democracies. In Varieties of Clientelism (pp. 1–19). Routledge.
Birch, S. (2024). Voting for the future: electoral institutions and the time horizons of democracy. Political Studies Review, 22(4), 762–783.
Carlin, R. E., & Love, G. J. (2018). Political competition, partisanship and interpersonal trust in electoral democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 48(1), 115–139.
Carugati, F. (2020). Democratic stability: A long view. Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 59–75.
Conradt, D. P. (2015). The civic culture and unified Germany: an overview. German Politics, 24(3), 249–270.
Curato, N., Hammond, M., & Min, J. B. (2019). Power in deliberative democracy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dalton, R. J., & Welzel, C. (2014). The civic culture transformed: From allegiant to assertive citizens. Cambridge University Press.
Daoust, J.-F., & Nadeau, R. (2023). Elections and satisfaction with democracy: Citizens, processes and outcomes. Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, M. (2021). Civil society as associational life. In The Nature of the Nonprofit Sector (pp. 336–349). Routledge.
Foa, R., Klassen, A., Slade, M., Rand, A., & Collins, R. (2020). The global satisfaction with democracy report 2020.
Fuchs, D., & Roller, E. (2018). Conceptualizing and measuring the quality of democracy: The citizens’ perspective. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 22–32.
Fumarola, A. (2020). The contexts of electoral accountability: Electoral integrity performance voting in 23 democracies. Government and Opposition, 55(1), 41–63.
Gabriel, O. W. (2017). Participation and political trust. In Handbook on political trust (pp. 228–241). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gerstlé, J., & Nai, A. (2019). Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success. European Journal of Communication, 34(4), 410–444.
Graham, M. H., & Svolik, M. W. (2020). Democracy in America? Partisanship, polarization, and the robustness of support for democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 392–409.
Hoskins, B. (2013). What does democracy need from its citizens? Identifying the qualities needed for active citizenship and making the values explicit. In Civic education and competences for engaging citizens in democracies (pp. 23–35). Springer.
Jacquet, V. (2017). Explaining non-participation in deliberative mini-publics. European Journal of Political Research, 56(3), 640–659.
Johnson, G. F., Morrell, M. E., & Black, L. W. (2019). Emotions and deliberation in the citizens’ initiative review. Social Science Quarterly, 100(6), 2168–2187.
Johnston, M. (2017). Democratic Norms, Political Money, and Corruption: The Deeper Roots of Political Malaise. In Corruption and Norms: Why Informal Rules Matter (pp. 13–30). Springer.
Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022). Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(10), 560–576.
Kaasa, A., & Andriani, L. (2022). Determinants of institutional trust: the role of cultural context. Journal of Institutional Economics, 18(1), 45–65.
Knutsen, C. H., & Teorell, J. (2024). Development and decline of democracies: the role of institutional factors. In Handbook of Comparative Political Institutions (pp. 379–394). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Kramon, E. (2016). Electoral handouts as information: Explaining unmonitored vote buying. World Politics, 68(3), 454–498.
Kreide, R. (2016). Digital spaces, public places and communicative power: In defense of deliberative democracy. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 42(4–5), 476–486.
Kutuk, Y., & Usturali, A. (2023). The nonlinear relationship between political trust and nonelectoral political participation in democratic and nondemocratic regimes. Social Science Quarterly, 104(4), 478–504.
Lamentowicz, W. (2019). Political Culture and Institution-Building: Democratic Evolution at Work. In Eastern Europe And Democracy (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
Maskivker, J. (2023). Merely voting or voting Well? Democracy and the requirements of citizenship. Inquiry, 1–22.
Mayne, Q., & Geißel, B. (2018). Don’t good democracies need “good” citizens? Citizen dispositions and the study of democratic quality. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 33–47.
Moehler, D. C., & Lindberg, S. I. (2009). Narrowing the legitimacy gap: Turnovers as a cause of democratic consolidation. The Journal of Politics, 71(4), 1448–1466.
Mutz, D. C. (2015). In-your-face politics: The consequences of uncivil media. In In-Your-Face Politics. Princeton University Press.
Norris, P. (2013). The new research agenda studying electoral integrity. Electoral Studies, 32(4), 563–575.
Norris, P., Frank, R. W., & i Coma, F. M. (2013). Assessing the quality of elections. Journal of Democracy, 24(4), 124–135.
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.
Rondinella, T., Segre, E., & Zola, D. (2017). Participative processes for measuring progress: Deliberation, consultation and the role of civil society. Social Indicators Research, 130(3), 959–982.
Theocharis, Y., & Jungherr, A. (2021). Computational social science and the study of political communication. Political Communication, 38(1–2), 1–22.
Tjahjoko, G. T., & others. (2015). Politik ambivalensi: nalar elite di balik pemenangan pilkada (Issue 1). PolGov.
Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2018). Digital political talk and political participation: Comparing established and third wave democracies. Sage Open, 8(2), 2158244018784986.
Van Ham, C., & Lindberg, S. I. (2015). From sticks to carrots: Electoral manipulation in Africa, 1986–2012. Government and Opposition, 50(3), 521–548.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v11i2.58303
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v11i2.58303.g26859
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Darmawan Purba, Bendi Juantara, R. Sigit Krisbintoro, Feni Rosalia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Cosmogov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.