Model of Determination of Cooperative Learning Techniques using AHP Method

Sukiman Liu

Abstract


Cooperative learning can accelerate knowledge transfer and social interaction between students. There are various cooperative learning techniques that can be used in the learning process. The determination of cooperative learning techniques needs to pay attention to the objectives to be achieved from the application of cooperative learning. In general, there are 5 goals to be achieved in cooperative learning, namely: Reward Interdependence, Task Interdependence, Individual Accountability, Teacher Imposed Structure, and Group Competition. Each cooperative learning technique will provide different results for each objective. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the weight of each goal properly so that later it can be considered which cooperative learning techniques can be used. One method that is very good in the process of determining the weight using a pairwise comparison matrix is the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The reason for using the AHP method is that the expert sometimes finds it difficult to directly assess which goals of cooperative learning should be prioritized and it will be more comfortable to provide an assessment in the form of comparisons between existing goals. The purpose of this study is to propose a model for determining cooperative learning techniques using the AHP method. The novelty of this research is to produce a model that can assist universities in determining the cooperative learning model that best suits their conditions. The results showed that the existence of this model can help the process of determining the type of cooperative learning based on priority cooperative learning goals. The results showed that the Jigsaw II method is the best cooperative learning technique.

Full Text:

PDF

References


G. Capar and K. Tarım, “Efficacy of the Cooperative Learning Method on Mathematics Achievement and Attitude: A Meta-Analysis Research,” Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, vol. 15, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.12738/estp.2015.2.2098.

OECD, “PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework.” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/9789264255425-en

Y.-J. Luo, M.-L. Lin, C.-H. Hsu, C.-C. Liao, and C.-C. Kao, “The Effects of Team-Game-Tournaments Application towards Learning Motivation and Motor Skills in College Physical Education,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 15, pp. 1–12, 2020.

Z. Huang, K. S. Savita, L. Dan-yi, and A. H. Omar, “The impact of business intelligence on the marketing with emphasis on cooperative learning: Case-study on the insurance companies,” Information Processing & Management, vol. 59, no. 2, p. 102824, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102824.

B. Dyson, “The Implementation of Cooperative Learning in an Elementary Physical Education Program,” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 69–85, Oct. 2002, doi: 10.1123/jtpe.22.1.69.

R. E. Slavin, “Cooperative Learning,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 315–342, Jun. 1980, doi: 10.3102/00346543050002315.

J. Zhang and B. Chen, “The effect of cooperative learning on critical thinking of nursing students in clinical practicum: A quasi-experimental study,” Journal of Professional Nursing, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 177–183, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.05.008.

D. Glätzle-Rützler, P. Lergetporer, and M. Sutter, “Collective intertemporal decisions and heterogeneity in groups,” Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 130, pp. 131–147, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.geb.2021.07.009.

H. G. A. V. Vijfeijken, “Managing team performance : interdependence, goals and rewards,” Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, PhD Project, 2004.

S. R. Pérez, B. L. del Barco, J. J. G. Bernal, and D. I. Gallego, “Cooperative learning and approach goals in physical education: The discriminant role of individual accountability,” Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.), vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 78–85, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.psicoe.2020.11.001.

M. Kharub, S. Kattekola, and S. K. Pendyala, “80/20 your organization using AHP for quantitative decision making,” Materials Today: Proceedings, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.229.

L. Zhu, Z. Zhao, Y. Wang, Q. Huang, Y. Sun, and D. Bi, “Weighting of toilet assessment scheme in China implementing analytic hierarchy process,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 283, p. 111992, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111992.

V. Rajput, N. K. Sahu, and A. Agrawal, “Optimization of waste kota stone dust filled epoxy composite by analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach,” Materials Today: Proceedings, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.168.

F. Wang and S. P. Yeap, “Using magneto-adsorbent for methylene Blue removal: A decision-making via analytical hierarchy process (AHP),” Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 40, p. 101948, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.101948.

H.-J. Lee, H. Kim, and H. Byun, “Are High Achievers Successful in Collaborative Learning? An Explorative Study of College Students’ Learning Approaches in Team Project-Based Learning,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 418–427, 2017, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2015.1105754.

L. M. Vaquero and M. Cebrian, “The rich club phenomenon in the classroom,” Scientific Reports, vol. 3, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1038/srep01174.

E. Dunne and M. Rawlins, “Bridging the Gap Between Industry and Higher Education: Training Academics to Promote Student Teamwork,” Innovations in Education and Training International, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 361–371, Jan. 2000, doi: 10.1080/135580000750052973.

P. Grošelj, “Symmetric projection group approach for promoting homogeneity in the analytic hierarchy process,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 133, p. 105343, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2021.105343.

F. Dweiri, S. Kumar, S. A. Khan, and V. Jain, “Designing an integrated AHP based decision support system for supplier selection in automotive industry,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 62, pp. 273–283, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.06.030.

M. S. Dwi Putra, S. Andryana, Fauziah, and A. Gunaryati, “Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process Method to Determine the Quality of Gemstones,” Advances in Fuzzy Systems, Oct. 01, 2018. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/afs/2018/9094380/ (accessed Mar. 06, 2021).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Publisher:

Department of Electrical Engineering
Universitas Padjadjaran

Jl. Ir. Soekarno km.21, Jatinangor, Sumedang, Jawa Barat 45363