Perawatan impaksi gigi kaninus dan gigitan bersilang anterior menggunakan teknik open window dan piggyback pada alat ortodonti straight wire

Treatment of canine impaction and crossbite anterior using the open window and piggyback techniques on straight wire orthodontic appliance

Ervina Dewiyanti, Endah Mardiati

Abstract


Pendahuluan: Impaksi gigi kaninus dan gigitan bersilang anterior sering menyebabkan gangguan estetik pada gigi pasien. Keadaan tersebut menjadikan pasien membutuhkan perawatan ortodonti. Laporan kasus ini bertujuan untuk mempertimbangkan teknik perawatan ortodonti yang efektif dan dapat mengoptimalkan proses serta hasil perawatan. Laporan kasus: seorang anak perempuan usia 13 tahun datang ke RSGM Unpad dengan keluhan utama gigi depan tidak rapi. Hasil analisis dan diagnosis menunjukkan maloklusi dental kelas I skeletal kelas III disertai crowding pada gigi anterior regio 11, persistensi gigi 53 dan pergeseran garis median gigi rahang atas ke kanan 2 mm dan pergeseran garis median gigi rahang  bawah ke kiri 1 mm. Panoramik menunjukkan terdapat gigi 13 yang impaksi dan persistensi gigi 53.Teknik piggyback merupakan suatu teknik perawatan ortodonti cekat sebagian segmen kawat fleksibel NiTi 0,012 pada lengkung rahang disatukan dengan kawat kaku SS 0,018 pada segmen keseluruhan. Hasil perawatan menunjukkan impaksi gigi 13 telah erupsi dan masuk ke dalam lengkung rahang dan gigitan bersilang di anterior pada gigi 11 terkoreksi. Simpulan: Teknik open window dan piggyback dapat digunakan untuk mengoreksi impaksi gigi dan menyesuaikan gigi ke dalam lengkung rahang. Impaksi gigi 13 pada pasien ini dapat erupsi penuh dalam waktu 3 bulan setelah bedah open window dan kurang dari 1 bulan setelah perlekatan braket pada gigi tersebut. Gigitan bersilang di anterior gigi 11 juga terkoreksi dengan relasi kaninus kelas I.

Kata kunci: Piggyback, impaksi, gigi kaninus, gigitan bersilang .

 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Canine impaction and anterior crossbite often cause an aesthetic problem for the patients. This situation makes the patients need orthodontic treatment. This case aims to consider orthodontic treatment techniques are effective and can optimize the process and treatments result. Case Report: In this case report a 13-year-old girl came to RSGM Unpad with a major complaint of crowding anterior teeth. The results of the analysis and diagnosis showed class III skeletal class dental malocclusion with anterior cramped teeth, anterior crossed bites of the teeth 11, persistence of the tooth 53 and the median tooth maxillary to right 2 mm shift and the median tooth diamond shift to 1 mm left. Panoramic shows there are 13 teeth that are impaction and persistence of the tooth 53. Discussion: The Piggy-back technique is a fixed orthodontic treatment technique in which some segments of the 0.010 flexible NiTi wire in the jaw arch are joined with a 0.018 rigid SS wire on the whole segment. Treatment results showed impacted tooth 13 had erupted and entered into the arch of the jaw and anterior crossed bites are corrected.Conclusion: can be drawn from this case report that open window and piggy-back techniques can be used to correct the impact teeth and adjust the teeth into the jaw arch. In these patients, the impacted tooth can be fully erupted within 3 months after open window surgery and less than 1 month after the bracket attachment to the tooth. Cross bites anterior tooth 11 also corrected with class I canine relation.

Keywords: Piggy-back, canine impaction, crossed bites.


Keywords


Piggyback, impaksi kaninus, gigitan bersilang, piggy-back, canine impaction, cross bite.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kokich VG. Surgical and orthodontic management of impacted maxillary canine. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126(3): 278-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.06.009

de Souza PA. Angle class I malocclusion with anterior negative overjet. Dental Press J Orthod. 2016; 21(2): 102-14. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.102-114.bbo

Becker A, Shpack N, Shteyer A. Attachment bonding to impacted teeth at the time of surgical exposure. Eur J Orthod. 1996; 18(5): 457-63. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/18.1.457

Pearson MH, Robinson SN, Reed R, Birnie DJ, Zaki GA. Management of palatally impacted canines: the findings of a collaborative study. Eur J Orthod. 1997; 19(5): 511-5. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/19.5.511

Jain AK, Jaiswal R, Kapoor S. Placing piggy back: An easy way out. 2016; 4(1): 26-7. DOI: 10.4103/2321-1407.125747

Sandler PJ, Murray AM, Di Biase D. Piggyback Archwires. Clin Orthod Res. 1999; 2(2): 99-104. DOI: 10.1111/ocr.1999.2.2.99

Wiedel AP, Bondemark L. Fixed versus Removable Orthodontic Appliances to Correct Anterior Crossbite in The Mixed Dentition- A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur J Orthod. 2015; 37(2): 123-7. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cju005

Tsui VWK, Alkhal HA, Hou HM, Wong RWK, Rabie ABM. The modified two-by-one fixed orthodontic appliance for bodily movement of canine: a case report. Cases J. 2009; 2: 211. DOI: 10.1186/1757-1626-2-211

Samawi SS. Straight-Wire Orthodontics. A Short Guide to Principles and Technique with Practical Clinical Tips for Increased Efficiency. 1st ed. Amman: Samawi Dental & Orthodontic Center; 2014. h. 18-9.

Mehta F, Patel R, Kharadi L, Mehta S. A Modified Transpalatal Arch for Correction of Bucally Placed Maxillary 2nd Molars: Non-Compliant Mechanics. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2014; 13(4): 24-6.

Deswita Y. Perbedaan besar friksi kinetik antara braket Edgewise standar slot .018 dengan slot .022 pada saat pergerakan sliding gigi kaninus (Uji laboratoris) [Tesis]. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia; 2014.

Abd El-Hady NA, Fouda M. Orthodontic Correction of Rotated Teeth. [Presentasi] Mansoura University. 18 Jan 2018.

Sjamsudin J, Sjafei A, Narmada IB, Hamid T, Djaharu’ddin I, Ardani IG, dkk. Buku Ajar Ortodonti II. Surabaya: Airlangga Press; 2014.

Devereux L, Moles D, Cunningham SJ, McKnight M. How important are lateral cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic treatment planning? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011; 139(2): e175-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.09.021

Lenza MA, de Carvalho AA, Lenza EB, Lenza M, Torres H, de Souza JB. Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods. Dent Press J Orthod. 2015; 20(3):29-36. DOI: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.3.029-036.oar




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkg.v31i1.17979

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran

INDEXING & PARTNERSHIP

     

      

     

 

Statistik Pengunjung

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran dilisensikan di bawah Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License