Tunneling connective tissue graft sebagai prosedur perawatan resesi gusi kelas I Miller

Tunnelling connective tissue graft as a treatment procedure for Miller Class I gingival recession

Prajna Metta, Heni Puspitadewi, Aldilla Miranda, Nunung Rusminah

Abstract


Pendahuluan: Resesi gusi pada regio anterior rahang atas seringkali menjadi perhatian dari segi estetik, bentuk dan fungsi. Resesi dapat terjadi pada satu atau beberapa gigi dan pada satu atau beberapa permukaan, sehingga menyebabkan kehilangan perlekatan dan terbukanya permukaan akar. Tujuan laporan kasus ini mempresentasikan keberhasilan perawatan resesi gusi kelas I Miller menggunakan teknik tunneling connective tissue graft. Laporan kasus: Pasien wanita, 37 tahun, datang dengan keluhan hipersensitifitas pada gigi depan dan belakang rahang atas serta gigi-gigi terasa lebih memanjang. Pemeriksaan klinis menunjukkan resesi gusi yang bervariasi sebesar 2-4 mm tanpa melibatkan mucogongival junction yang meluas dari gigi 15 sampai 25. Terdapat tambalan glass ionomer pada daerah servikal gigi 22 sampai 24. Hasil pengukuran lebar gusi berkeratin lebih dari 3 mm. Diagnosa dari kasus ini adalah kelainan mucogingival multipel Kelas I Miller. Rencana perawatan yang akan dilakukan adalah prosedur tunneling connective tissue graft pada regio anterior labial rahang atas 22 sampai 24. Prosedur dilakukan dengan menutup bagian akar yang terbuka menggunakan connective tissue dari daerah palatal area premolar yang kemudian difiksasi dengan teknik jahitan anchorage. Perawatan ini menunjukkan hasil berupa penambahan ketebalan gusi berkeratin dan pengurangan sensitifitas akar tanpa adanya kekambuhan setelah enam bulan pasca bedah. Simpulan: Teknik tunneling dengan connective tissue graft dapat menjadi pilihan pada perawatan resesi gusi kelas I Miller dalam kasus ini berhasil menutup seluruh permukaan akar yang terbuka dan tidak terjadi relaps setelah enam bulan.

Kata kunci: Connective tissue graft, resesi, penutupan akar, tunneling..

 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Gingival recession in the maxillary anterior region is often becoming aesthetical, shape, and functional concern. Recession can occur on one or several teeth and one or more surfaces, causing attachment loss and the root surface opening. This case report was aimed to present the successful treatment of Miller Class I gingival recession with the tunnelling connective tissue graft technique. Case report: Female patient, 37 years old, presented with complaints of hypersensitivity in the front and back of the maxilla and elongated-teeth sensation. Clinical examination showed gingival recession varying by 2-4 mm without involving the mucogingival junction extending from teeth 15 to 25. A glass ionomer filling was performed in the cervical area of teeth 22 to 24. The measurement result was keratinised gingival width of more than 3 mm. The case diagnosis was multiple Miller Class I mucogingival abnormalities. The treatment plan performed was the tunnelling connective tissue graft procedure in the maxillary anterior labial region 22 to 24. The procedure was performed by covering the exposed root using the connective tissue from the palatal area of the premolar area, which was then fixed with an anchorage suture technique. This treatment increase in keratinised gingival thickness and reduction in root sensitivity without recurrence after six months after surgery. Conclusion: Tunneling connective tissue graft can become an option in the treatment of Miller Class I gingival recession. In this case, it succeeded in covering the entire exposed root surface and does not relapse after six months.

Keywords: Connective tissue graft, recession, root coverage, tunneling.

Keywords


Connective tissue graft; resesi; penutupan akar; tunneling

Full Text:

PDF

References


Gobbato L, Nart J, Bressan E, Mazzocco F, Paniz G, Lops D. Patient morbidity and root coverage outcomes after the application of a subepithelial connective tissue graft in combination with a coronally advanced flap or via a tunneling technique: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20(8) :2191-2202. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1721-7.

Baker P. Gusil Recession-Causes and Management. Prim Dent J. 2020; 8(4): 40–7. DOI: 10.1308/205016820828463843.

Mythri S, Arunkumar SM, Hegde S, Rajesh SK, Munaz M, Ashwin D. Etiology and occurrence of gingival recession - An epidemiological study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015; 19(6): 671-5. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.156881.

Merijohn GK. Management and prevention of gusil recession. Periodontol 2000. 2016; 71(1): 228–42. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12115

Stefanini M, Marzadori M, Aroca S, Felice P, Sangiorgi M, Zucchelli G. Decision making in root-coverage procedures for the esthetic outcome. Periodontol 2000. 2018; 77(1): 54-64. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12205.

Moka LR, Boyapati R, Mutthineni RB, Putcha MS, Gunturu KR, Nagubandi KK. Comparision of coronally advanced and semilunar coronally repositioned flap for the treatment of gusil recession. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2014; 8(1): 4–8. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8928.4428

Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Nguyen TVN, Tattan M, Ravidà A, Wang HL. Efficacy of tunnel technique in the treatment of localized and multiple gusil recessions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2018; 89(1): 1075–90. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.18-0066

Aroca S, Molnár B, Windisch P, Gera I, Salvi GE, Nikolidakis D, et al. Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class i and II gusil recessions with a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: A randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013; 40(1): 713–20. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12112.

Zuhr O, Rebele SF, Cheung SL, Hürzeler MB. Surgery without papilla incision: tunneling flap procedures in plastic periodontal and implant surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2018; 77(1): 123–49. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12214

Dani S, Dhage A, Gundannavar G. The pouch and tunnel technique for management of multiple gusil recession defects. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014;18:774. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.147431.

Tavelli L, Ravidà A, Lin GH, Del Amo FS, Tattan M, Wang HL. Comparison between Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft and De-epithelialized Gingival Graft: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2019; 1;21(2): 82-96.

Rebele SF, Zuhr O, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hürzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: A RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gusil dimensions. J Clin Periodontol 2014;41(6):593–603. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12254.

De Sanctis M, Clementini M. Flap approaches in plastic periodontal and implant surgery: Critical elements in design and execution. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41(1): 108–22. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12189.

Zuhr O, Rebele SF, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hürzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: A RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient-centred outcomes. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41(6): 582–92. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12178.

Chatterjee A, Sharma E, Gundanavar G, Subbaiah S. Treatment of multiple gusil recessions with vista technique: A case series. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015; 19(1): 232–5. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.145836.

Pazmiño VFC, Rodas MAR, Cáceres CDB, Duarte GGR, Azuaga MVC, de Paula BL, Caliente EA, Soares S, Silveira EMV. Clinical Comparison of the Subepithelial Connective Tissue versus Platelet-Rich Fibrin for the Multiple Gingival Recession Coverage on Anterior Teeth Using the Tunneling Technique. Case Rep Dent. 2017;2017:4949710. DOI: 10.1155/2017/4949710.

Nanda T, Jain S, Kaur H, Kapoor D, Nanda S, Jain R. Root conditioning in periodontology- Revisited. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014; 5(1): 356–8. DOI: 10.4103/0976-9668.136183.

Mukherji A, Bhusari P, Parwani S, Chitnis P. Evaluation of citric acid and tetracycline hydrochloride as root conditioners on instrumented periodontally diseased root surfaces- A comparative SEM study. Int J Clin Dent. 2013; 6(4): 367–82.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkg.v32i1.18042

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran

INDEXING & PARTNERSHIP

     

      

     

 

Statistik Pengunjung

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran dilisensikan di bawah Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License