Uji kekerasan fiber reinforced composite dengan e-glass fiber dental dan non-dental
Hardness test of dental and non-dental e-glass fiber reinforced composite
Abstract
Pendahuluan: Salah satu alternatif bahan yang digunakan sebagai gigi tiruan cekat adalah fiber reinforced composite (FRC) yaitu kombinasi fiber dan matriks resin. Fiber yang sering digunakan di kedokteran gigi adalah e-glass fiber. Kekurangan e-glass fiber dental adalah modulus tensile rendah, self abrasive, ketahanan fatique rendah, dan harga relatif mahal. E-glass fiber non-dental dipilih sebagai alternatif karena kompisisinya hampir sama dengan e-glass fiber dental. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui hasil uji perbedaan kekerasan fiber reinforced composite antara e-glass fiber dental dan e-glass fiber non-dental. Metode: Jenis penelitian eksperimental murni. Sampel berbentuk silindris dengan diameter 4 mm dan tinggi 2 mm, terdiri dari 3 kelompok; kelompok e-glass fiber dental, e-glass fiber non-dental, dan kelompok tanpa fiber sebagai kontrol negatif; masing-masing terdiri dari 4 sampel. Kelompok e-glass fiber non-dental dan e-glass fiber dental diberi silane. Uji kekerasan dilakukan dengan Vickers Hardness Testing Machine dengan beban 294,2 N selama 10-15 detik. Analisa statistik menggunakan independent sample t-test. Hasil: Nilai kekerasan e-glass fiber dental 60,83 VHN, e-glass non-dental 53,56 VHN, dan kelompok tanpa fiber 48,23 VHN. Nilai signifikasi yang diperoleh adalah p = 0,000; di mana p < 0,05, artinya terdapat perbedaan signifikan antara kekerasan FRC dengan e-glass fiber dental dan FRC dengan e-glass fiber non-dental. Simpulan: Terdapat perbedaan kekerasan antara FRC dengan e-glass fiber dental dan non-dental, di mana kekerasan FRC dengan e-glass fiber dental lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan FRC dengan e-glass fiber non-dental.
Kata kunci: Kekerasan, fiber reinforced composite, glass fiber dental, glass fiber non-dental
ABSTRACT
Introduction: One alternative material can be used as fixed denture is fiber reinforced composite (FRC), from a combination of fiber and resin matrix. Fiber often used in dentistry is e-glass fiber. The disadvantages of dental e-glass fiber are low tensile modulus, self abrasive, low resistance to fatique, and relatively high prices. Non-dental e-glass fiber was chosen as an alternative because the composition is almost the same as dental e-glass fiber. The purpose of this study was to determine the hardness difference test result between dental and non-dental glass fiber reinforced composite. Methods: This research was true experimental research. The samples were cylindrical with a diameter of 4 mm and the height of 2 mm, consisted of 3 groups; the dental e-glass fiber group, non-dental e-glass fiber group, and non-fiber group as negative controls; each consisted of 4 samples. The group of non-dental e-glass fiber and dental e-glass fiber was given silane. The hardness test was carried out with the Vickers Hardness Testing Machine with a load of 294.2 N for 10-15 seconds. Statistical analysis was performed using independent sample t-test. Results: The hardness value of dental e-glass fiber reinforced composite was 60.83 VHN, non-dental e-glass was 53.56 VHN, and non-fiber group was 48.23 VHN. The significance value obtained was p = 0,000; and p < 0.05, means that there was a significant difference between the hardness of dental e-glass fiber and non-dental glass fiber FRC. Conclusion: There is a difference in the hardness between dental and non-dental e-glass fiber FRC, where the hardness of e-glass dental fiber is higher than non-dental e-glass fiber.
Keywords: Hardness, fiber reinforced composite, dental glass fiber, non-dental glass fiber
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agtini MD. Presentase Pengguna Protesa di Indonesia. Med Litbang Kes. 2010; 20(2): 50-8.
Siagian KV. Kehilangan Sebagian Gigi Pada Rongga Mulut. J eCl. 2016; 4(1): 1-6.
Shillingburg HT, Sather DA, Wilson EL, Cain JR, Mitchell DL, Blanco LJ, et al. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago: Quintessence Pub Co.; 2012. h.69.
Khan AS, Azam MT, Khan M, Mian SA, Ur Rehman I. An Update on Glass Fiber Dental Restorative Composite: A Systematic Review. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015; 47: 26-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.11.015
Vallittu P. Non-metallic Biomaterial for Tooth Repair and Replacement. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2013.
Zhang M, Matinlinna JP. E-Glass Fiber Reinforced Composites in Dental Application. Silicon. 2012; (4)1: 73-8. DOI: 10.1007/s12633-011-9075-x
Imam DNA, Sunarintyas S, Nuryono. Pengaruh Komposisi Glass Fiber Non Denal dan Penambahan Silane terhadap Kekuatan Geser Fiber Reinforced Composite sebagai Retainer Ortodonsi. Maj Ked Gi Ind. 2015: 1(1): 53-8. DOI: 10.22146/majkedgiind.8966
Mallick PK. Fiber-reinforced composites : materials, manufacturing, and design. 3rd ed. Florida: CRC Press; 2007.
Faizah A, Widjijono, Nuryono. Pengaruh Komposisi Beberapa Glass Fiber Non Dental Terhadap Kelarutan Komponen Fiber Reinforced Composites. Maj Ked Gi Ind. 2016; 2(1): 13-19. DOI: 10.22146/majkedgiind.11249
Nayiroh N. Teknologi Material Komposit. [Catatan Kuliah] Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang. 3 Juli 2013. h. 1-21.
Lestari LP, Usri K, Febrida R. The comparison of color stability between thermoplastic nylon resin and heat-cured acrylic resin after tea-soaking using spectrophotometer. Padjadjaran J Dent. 2009; 21(3): 143-6. DOI: 10.24198/pjd.vol21no3.14107
Westman MP, Fifield LS, Simmons K, Laddha S, Kafentzis TA. Natural Fiber Composites: A Review. United States Department of Energy. 2010.
Sari WP, Sumantri D, Imam DNA, Sunarintyas S. Pemeriksaan Komposisi Glass Fiber Komersial Dengan Teknik X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF). J B-Dent. 2014; 1(2): 155-60.
Anusavice K. Phillip’s science of dental material. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003. h. 55-8.
Goodman C. American Dental Association Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. Dalam: Medical Technology Assessment Directory. A Pilot Reference to Organizations, Assessments, and Information Resources; 1988. National Academies Press (US).
Suparno NR, Sunarintyas S, Herliansyah MK. Non-Dental glass fiber impregnation on flexural strength of fiber reinforced composite. Maj Ked Gi Ind. 2018; 4(1): 39-45. DOI: 10.22146/majkedgiind.17137
Dagwa I, Ohaeri JO. Property Evaluation of Hybrid OPEBF/Banana/ Glass Fiber Reinforced Unsaturated Polyester Composites. Am J Mater Sci Eng. 2014; 2(4): 45-53. DOI: 10.12691/ajmse-2-4-1
Abouelleil H, Pradelle N, Villat C, Attik N, Colon P, Grosgogeat B. Comparison of mechanical properties of a new fiber reinforced composite and bulk filling composites. Restor Dent Endod. 2015; 40(4): 262-70. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.262
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkg.v31i1.18048
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran
INDEXING & PARTNERSHIP
Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran dilisensikan di bawah Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License