Hubungan tingkat maturitas vertebra servikalis dengan panjang mandibula
Relationship between cervical vertebrae maturity and mandibular length
Abstract
Pendahuluan: Beberapa tahun terakhir, hubungan antara cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) dengan pertumbuhan mandibula yang dinilai melalui panjang mandibula mendapat perhatian. Pemahaman mengenai pertumbuhan dan perkembangan kraniofasial pasien sangat penting dalam membantu menegakkan diagnosis, merencanakan perawatan, dan keberhasilan perawatan ortodonti. Waktu perawatan ortodonti berhubungan dengan keparahan dan tipe maloklusi yang dikaitkan dengan tingkat maturitas pasien. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis hubungan tingkat maturitas vertebra servikalis dengan panjang mandibula. Metode: Jenis penelitian analitik dengan rancangan cross sectional. Sampel penelitian menggunakan 100 foto sefalogram lateral pasien usia 8-18 tahun dengan Klas I skeletal. Kualitas foto sefalogram lateral baik dan berasal dari laboratorium yang sama. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menganalisis tingkat maturitas vertebra servikalis dan mengukur panjang mandibula pada sefalogram lateral. Uji statistik yang digunakan ANOVA dan Kruskal-Wallis, analisis korelasi menggunakan Pearson. Hasil: Terdapat perbedaan yang bermakna pada panjang mandibula laki-laki dan perempuan, dengan nilai p=0,009. Panjang mandibula pada laki-laki lebih besar dibandingkan perempuan. Peningkatan panjang mandibula tertinggi pada laki-laki terjadi dari cervical vertebrae maturation stages (CVMS) 3 ke CVMS 4 sebesar 8,19±5,79 mm dan pada perempuan terjadi dari CVMS 3 ke CVMS 4 sebesar 6,38±4,51 mm. Hubungan yang paling erat adalah pada tahap CVMS 3 ke CVMS 4 sebesar 0,858 yang bersifat kuat. Simpulan: Terdapat hubungan antara tingkat maturitas vertebra servikalis dengan panjang mandibula, pada setiap tingkat maturitas vertebra servikalis terjadi peningkatan panjang mandibula. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa pertumbuhan mandibula sejalan dengan maturitas vertebra servikalis.
Kata kunci: Maturitas, vertebra servikalis, panjang mandibula.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: In recent years, the relationship between cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) and mandibular growth assessed by mandibular length has received attention. Understanding the patient’s craniofacial growth and development is very important in helping make the diagnosis, planning treatment, and the success of orthodontic treatment. The orthodontic treatment timing was related to the severity and type of malocclusion associated with the patient’s maturity level. This study was aimed to analyse the relationship between cervical vertebrae maturity level and mandibular length. Methods: This was an analytic study with a cross-sectional design. The study sample used 100 lateral cephalogram photos of patients aged 8-18 years with skeletal Class I. The quality of the lateral cephalogram images was good and came from the same laboratory. Data collection was carried out by analysing the cervical vertebrae’s maturity level and measuring the mandibular length on the lateral cephalogram. The statistical test used was ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis, and the correlation analysis used was Pearson. Results: There were significant differences in the male and female mandibular length, with the p-value = 0.009. The mandibular length in male was higher than in the female. The highest increase in the male mandibular length occurred from cervical vertebrae maturation stages (CVMS) 3 to CVMS 4 by 8.19 ± 5.79 mm, and in women occurred from CVMS 3 to CVMS 4 by 6.38 ± 4.51 mm. The closest relationship was at the CVMS 3 to CVMS 4 stage of 0.858, which was categorised as strong. Conclusion: There is a relationship between the maturity level of the cervical vertebrae and the mandibular length. At each maturity level of the cervical vertebrae, there is an increase in the mandibular length. These results suggest that the mandibular growth is in line with the maturity of the cervical vertebrae.
Keywords: Maturity, cervical vertebrae, mandibular length.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Tayyab M, Hussain U, Ali M, Ayub A, Hadi F. Evaluation of mandibular length in subjects with class I and class II skeletal patterns using the Cervical vertebrae maturation. PODJ 2015; 35 (1): 74-8. DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242010000100008
Cangialosi TJ, Vives VJ. Another look at skeletal maturation using hand wrist and cervical vertebrae evaluation. OJO 2018; 8: 1-10. DOI: 10.4235/ojo.2018.81001
Al-Mohaidaly MS. “Correlation between Cervical Vertebral Maturation and Chronological Age in a Group of Saudi Arabian Females”. EC Dental Science. 2016; 3(5): 608-614.
Enikawati M, Soenawan H, Suharsini M. Panjang maksila dan mandibula pada anak usia 10-16 tahun (kajian sefalometri lateral). 1-13. Jakarta : FKG UI. 2013.
Cericato GO, Bittencourt MAV, Paranhos LR. Validity of the assessment method of skeletal maturation by cervical vertebrae: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2015; 44: 1-7. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20140270
Oscandar F, Malinda Y, Azhari H, Murniati N, Yeh S Ong. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth in deutro-malay sub race. InteriOR 2018; 4(2): 1-7. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/300/1/0/012029
Sonnesen L. Associations between the Cervical Vertebral Column and Craniofacial Morphology. International Journal of Dentistry. Vol 2010; h. 1-6. DOI: 10.1155/2010/295728.
Purbaningsih M, Chusida A, Bambang Soegeng H. Penentuan usia growth spurt pubertal mandibula perempuan berdasarkan cervical vertebral maturation indicators (CVMIs). J PDGI 2011; 61(1): 15-19.
Joshi VV, Iyengar AR, Nagesh KS, Gupta J. Comparative study between cervical vertebrae and hand-wrist maturation for the assessment of skeletal age. Rev Clin Pesq Odontol 2010; 6 (3): 207-213. DOI: 10.7213/aor.v6i3.23157
Altan M, Dalci ON, Iseri H. Growth of the cervical vertebrae in girls from 8 to 17 years. A longitudinal study. Europ J Orthod 2011; 34(3): 327-334. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjr013.
Perinetti G, Contardo L, Castaldo A, McNamara J, Fanchi L. Diagnostic reliability of the cervical vertebral maturation method and standing height in the identification of the mandibular growth spurt. Angle Orthod 2016; 86 (4): 599–609. DOI: 10.2319/072415-499.1.
Xiao-Guang Z, Jiuxiang Lin, Jiu-Hui J, Qingzhu W, Sut Hong NG. Validity and reliability of a method for assessment of cervical vertebral maturation. Angle Orthod 2012; 82(2): 229–234. DOI: 10.2319/051511-333.1
Kuc-Michalska M, Baccetti T. Duration of the pubertal peak in skeletal class I and class III subjects. Angle Orthod 2010; 80(1): 54-7. DOI: 10.2319/020309-69.1.
Tayebi A, Tofangchiha M, Fard M, Gosili A. The relationship of mandibular radiomorphometric indices to skeletal age, chronological age and skeletal malocclusion type. J Clin Exp Dent 2017; 9(8): e970-5. DOI: 10.4317/jced.53819.
Arifin R, Noviyandri PR, Shatia LS. Hubungan usia skeletal dengan puncak pertumbuhan pada pasien usia 10-14 tahun di RSGM Unsyiah. Cakradonya Dent J 2017; 9(1): 44-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/cdj.v9i1.9877
Generoso R, Sadoco EC, Armond MC, Gameiro GH. Evaluation of mandibular le ngth in subjects with class I and class II skeletal patterns using the cervical vertebrae maturation. Braz Oral Res 2010; 24(1): 46-51. DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242010000100008.
Billie-Jean R, Burnside G, Jayne EH. Reliability of cervical vertebral maturation staging. AJO-DO 2016; 150 (1): 98-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.12.013.
Sivaraj A. Essentials of Orthodontics. 1. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, 2013: 79
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkg.v32i3.28300
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran
INDEXING & PARTNERSHIP
Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran dilisensikan di bawah Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License