Posisi kondilus setelah perawatan ortodontik pada maloklusi kelas II divisi 1 dengan pencabutan premolar
Condylar position after orthodontic treatment in class II division 1 malocclusion with premolar extraction
Abstract
Pendahuluan: Maloklusi kelas II divisi 1 dilaporkan seringkali memicu terjadinya gangguan sendi temporomandibula. Posisi kondilus mengalami perubahan pada akhir perawatan ortodontik dengan pencabutan premolar pada maloklusi kelas II divisi 1. Tujuan penelitian menganalisis posisi kondilus pada akhir perawatan ortodontik supaya dapat memberikan pelayanan yang efektif dan komprehensif kepada pasien. Metode: Jenis penelitian deskriptif observasional dengan desain kohort dilakukan pada Klinik Spesialis RSKGM FKG UI dari Maret sampai Mei 2019. Subjek sebanyak 30 orang mengalami maloklusi kelas II divisi 1 yang memiliki gejala gangguan temporomandibular yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi. Metode sampling yang digunakan adalah sampling konsekutif. Foto transkranial dibandingkan dan diukur ruang sendinya bagian anterior, posterior dan superior dan dianalisis menggunakan uji Mc Nemar. Hasil: Sebelum dan sesudah perawatan ortodontik, posisi kondilus kanan dan kiri tidak mengalami perubahan yang signifikan (p>0,05). Sebelum dan sesudah perawatan ortodontik, AJS (Anterior Joint Space), PJS (Posterior Joint Space), SS (Superior Space) kanan dan kiri tidak mengalami perubahan yang signifikan (p>0,05). Gejala gangguan sendi temporomandibula pada akhir perawatan ortodontik adalah kliking dan krepitasi dilaporkan masih ada sedangkan gejala tidak nyaman dan keterbatasan membuka mulut dilaporkan sudah hilang. Simpulan: Tidak terdapat perbedaan posisi kondilus kanan dan kiri, sebelum dan sesudah perawatan ortodontik dengan pencabutan premolar pada maloklusi kelas II divisi 1. Keluhan gangguan sendi temporomandibular tidak ditemukan lagi pada akhir perawatan ortodontik.
Kata kunci: Posisi kondilus, perawatan ortodontik, maloklusi kelas II divisi 1, pencabutan premolar.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Class II division 1 malocclusion is reported to trigger temporomandibular joint disorders often. The position of the condyles changed at the end of orthodontic treatment with premolar removal in class II division 1 malocclusion. This study aimed to analyse the position of the condyles at the end of orthodontic treatment to provide effective and comprehensive services to patients. Methods: This type of descriptive observational study with a cohort design was conducted at the Specialist Clinic of University of Indonesia Dental Hospital from March to May 2019. Thirty subjects experienced class II division 1 malocclusion who had temporomandibular disorders that met the inclusion criteria. The sampling method used was consecutive sampling. Transcranial radiographs were compared, and anterior, posterior and superior joint spaces were measured and analysed using the McNemar test. Results: Before and after orthodontic treatment, the position of the right and left condyles did not change significantly (p>0.05). Before and after orthodontic treatment, AJS (Anterior Joint Space), PJS (Posterior Joint Space), SS (Superior Space) right and left did not change significantly (p>0.05). Symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorder at the end of orthodontic treatment were clicking, and crepitus was reported to be present, while the symptoms of discomfort and limited opening of the mouth were reported to have disappeared. Conclusion: There is no difference in the position of the right and left condyles before and after orthodontic treatment with premolar extraction in class II division 1 malocclusion. Complaints of temporomandibular joint disorders were not found again at the end of orthodontic treatment.
Keywords: Condyle position, orthodontic treatment, class II division 1 malocclusion, premolar extraction.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Okeson JP. Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion. 7th ed. St.Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014. p. 504
Jiménez-Silva A, Tobar-Reyes J, Vivanco-Coke S, Pastén-Castro E, Palomino-Montenegro H. Centric relation-intercuspal position discrepancy and its relationship with temporomandibular disorders. A systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2017; 75(7): 463-74. DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2017.1340667.
Kapoor D, Garg D. Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 Malocclusion in a Population Living in the Chitwan District of Nepal. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2017; 4(4): 947-949.
Allgayer S, Lima EMSD,Mezomo MB. Influence of premolar extractions on the facial profile evaluated by the Holdaway analysis. Rev Odonto Cienc 2011; 26(1): 22-29 DOI: 10.1590/S1980-65232011000100007
Rani S, Pawah S, Gola S, Bakshi M. Analysis of Helkimo index for temporomandibular disorder diagnosis in the dental students of Faridabad city: A cross-sectional study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017; 17(1): 48-52. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.194941.
Valerio CS, Taitson PF, Seraidarian PI. Use of transcranial radiograph to detect morphological changes in mandibular condyles. Rev. CEFAC. 2017; 19(1): 54-62
Cobourne MT, DiBiase AT. Handbook of Orthodontics. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2016. p. 584
Maria A. Influence of generalized joint hypermobility on temporomandibular joint and dental occlusion : a cross-sectional study Influência da hipermobilidade articular generalizada sobre a articulação temporomandibular e a oclusão dentária : estudo transversal. CoDAS. 2016; 28(5): 551-7 DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20162014082
Agbaje JO, Casteele E Van De, Salem AS, Anumendem D. Assessment of occlusion with the T-Scan system in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 1-8. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05788-x
Manjula WS, Tajir F, Murali RV, Kumar SK, Nizam M. Assessment of optimal condylar position with cone-beam computed tomography in south Indian female population. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015; 7(1): 121-4. DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.155855.
Dzingutė A, Pileičikienė G, Baltrušaitytė A, Skirbutis G. Evaluation of the relationship between the occlusion parameters and symptoms of the temporomandibular joint disorder. Acta Med Litu. 2017; 24(3): 167-175. DOI: 10.6001/actamedica.v24i3.3551.
O'Donovan J. An introduction to orthodontics, 4th edition. Br Dent J 214, 479 (2013). DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.478
Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th ed. philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014. p. 768
Nagmode S, Yadav P, Jadhav M. Effect of First Premolar Extraction on Point A, Point B, and Pharyngeal Airway Dimension in Patients with Bimaxillary Protrusion. J Indian Orthod Soc. 2017; 51(4): 239-244.
Nishi SE, Basri R, Rahman NA, Husein A, Alam MK. Association between muscle activity and overjet in class II malocclusion with surface electromyography. J Orthod Sci. 2018; 7: 3. DOI: 10.4103/jos.JOS_74_17.
Mitsui SN, Yasue A, Kuroda S, Tanaka E. Long-term stability of conservative orthodontic treatment in a patient with temporomandibular joint disorder. J Orthod Sci. 2016; 5(3): 104-108. DOI: 10.4103/2278-0203.186168
Imanimoghaddam M, Madani AS, Mahdavi P, Bagherpour A, Darijani M, Ebrahimnejad H. Evaluation of condylar positions in patients with temporomandibular disorders: A cone-beam computed tomographic study. Imaging Sci Dent. 2016; 46(2): 127-31. DOI: 10.5624/isd.2016.46.2.127.
Winarti HS, Pudyani PS, Hardjono S, Suparwitri S. Perawatan maloklusi klas ii divisi 1 disertai crowding dan openbite menggunakan teknik begg. Maj Ked Gig. 2013; 20(2): 217-23. DOI: 10.22146/majkedgiind.8163.
Windriyatna, Sugiatno E, Th M, Tjahjanti E. Pengaruh kehilangan gigi posterior rahang atas dan rahang bawah terhadap gangguan sendi temporomandibula (Tinjauan klinis radiografi sudut inklinasi eminensia artikularis). J Ked Gigi. 2015; 6(3): 315-20.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkg.v33i1.30643
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran
INDEXING & PARTNERSHIP
Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran dilisensikan di bawah Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License