Perawatan maloklusi skeletal kelas II disertai kaninus ektopik menggunakan penjangkar Temporary Anchorage Device
Management of skeletal class II malocclusion and ectopic canine with Temporary Anchorage DeviceAbstract
ABSTRAK
Pendahuluan: Maloklusi kelas II seringkali menjadi alasan pasien dalam mencari perawatan ortodonti. Maloklusi ini juga dapat disebabkan oleh mandibula retrognati, maksila prognati, ataupun kombinasi keduanya. Perbedaan dalam ukuran gigi dan lengkung rahang dapat menyebabkan gigi berjejal karena kekurangan ruang. Perbedaan ini juga merupakan salah satu etiologi dari kaninus yang ektopik, atau gigi yang erupsi di luar lengkung rahang. Temporary Anchorage Device (TAD) digunakan pada perawatan ortodonti sebagai alat penjangkar absolut dengan bahan titanium alloy atau stainless steel. Beberapa keunggulan TAD yaitu, kemudahan dalam pemasangan dan pelepasan, kenyamanan untuk pasien, dan terutama untuk memberikan penjangkaran absolut untuk pergerakan gigi dengan variasi yang beragam. Tujuan laporan kasus ini membahas penatalaksanaan perawatan ortodontik pada maloklusi skeletal kelas II dengan gigi kaninus ektopik dan gigi geligi yang berjejal berat, dengan menggunakan alat ortodontik cekat sistem MBT disertai TAD. Laporan kasus: Seorang pasien perempuan berusia 26 tahun, datang ke Klinik Spesialis Ortodonti Rumah Sakit Kesehatan Gigi dan Mulut Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Indonesia (RSKGM FKG UI), dengan keluhan gigi depan tidak teratur dan kesulitan untuk membersihkan gigi secara menyeluruh. Secara klinis diketahui bahwa pasien memiliki maloklusi kelas II dengan gigi kaninus yang ektopik disertai gigi yang berjejal berat. Perawatan ortodonti dilakukan menggunakan breket preadjusted sistem MBT slot.022 serta penjangkaran Temporary Anchorage Device (TAD) Simpulan: Senyum pasien yang lebih estetik dengan inklinasi gigi anterior yang normal dan hubungan insisif, kaninus, dan molar yang terkoreksi dengan baik menjadi kelas I.
Kata kunci: gigi berjejal; kaninus ektopik; maloklusi kelas I; temporary anchorage device (TAD)
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Class II malocclusion is often a reason for patients to seek orthodontic treatment. Malocclusion can also be caused by the retrognathic mandible, prognathic maxilla, or a combination of both. In addition, differences in the teeth’ size and the jaw arch can cause crowding due to lack of space. This difference is also one of the etiologies of ectopic canines, or teeth that erupt outside the jaw arch. A temporary Anchorage Device (TAD) is used in orthodontic treatment as an absolute anchor device with titanium alloy or stainless steel material. Some of the TAD advantages are ease of installation and removal and comfort received by the patient, mainly to provide absolute anchorage for tooth movement with lots of variety. This case report will discuss the management of orthodontic treatment in class II skeletal malocclusion with ectopic canines and severe crowding of teeth, using fixed orthodontic appliances MBT system with TAD. Case report: A 26-year-old female patient came to the Orthodontics Specialist Clinic of the University of Indonesia’s Dental Hospital with the chief complaint of dissatisfaction with the front teeth and inability to brush properly. From the clinical examination, the patient has a Class II malocclusion with an ectopic canine and severe crowding. Orthodontic treatment was performed using pre-adjusted brackets with MBT slot .022 system and TADs. Conclusion: The treatment result shows a more aesthetic smile and a normalized anterior tooth inclination and class I relationships of the incisive, canines, and molars.
Keywords: severe crowding; ectopic canine; class II malocclusion; temporary anchorage device (TAD)
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Mitchell L. The Aetiology and Classification of Malocclusion. In: An Introduction to Orthodontics. 4th ed. London: Oxford University Press. 2013. p. 9-16.
El-Bokle D, Abbas NH. A novel method for the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2020;158(4):599-611. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.05.025
Naragond A, Kenganal S, Sagarkar R. Orthodontic camouflage treatment in an adult patient with a class II, division 1 malocclusion- a case report. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2013;7(2):395-400. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5191.2780
Proffit W. Contemporary Orthodontics. In: 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc. 2019. p. 11-16,59.
Alessandri Bonetti G, Zanarini M, Incerti Parenti S, Marini I, Gatto MR. Preventive treatment of ectopically erupting maxillary permanent canines by extraction of deciduous canines and first molars: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;139(3):316-323. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.051
Becker A, Chaushu S. Etiology of maxillary canine impaction: A review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015;148(4):557-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.013
Sachan A. Orthodontic management of buccally erupted ectopic canine with two case reports. Contemp Clin Dent. 2016;3(1). DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.94563
Ferreira JB. A simple approach to correct ectopic eruption of maxillary canines. AJODO. 2019;155(6):871-880. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.046
Garib DG, Janson G, Baldo TDO, Santos PBD Dos. Complications of misdiagnosis of maxillary canine ectopic eruption. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2012;142(2):256-263. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.12.023
Mizrahi E. The use of Miniscrews in Orthodontics: A Review of Selected Clinical Applications. Prim Dent J. 2016;5(4):20-27. DOI: 10.1308/205016816820209569
Poletti L, Silvera AA, Ghislanzoni LTH. Dentoalveolar class III treatment using retromolar miniscrew anchorage. Prog Orthod. 2013;14(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-7
Antoszewska-Smith J, Sarul M, Łyczek J, Konopka T, Kawala B. Effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrew implants in anchorage reinforcement during en-masse retraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2017;151(3):440-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.08.029
Alharbi F, Almuzian M, Bearn D. Anchorage effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrews compared to headgear and transpalatal arches: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019;77(2):88-98. DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1508742
Yi Lin S, Mimi Y, Ming Tak C, Kelvin Weng Chiong F, Hung Chew W. A study of success rate of miniscrew implants as temporary anchorage devices in Singapore. Int J Dent. 2015;2015. DOI: 10.1155/2015/294670
Tian H, Xie C, Lin M, Yang H, Ren A. Effectiveness of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices in cinen retraction and anchorage preservation during the two-step technique: a systematic review and metaanalysis. MBC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01271-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkg.v34i2.34106
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran
INDEXING & PARTNERSHIP
Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran dilisensikan di bawah Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License