Perbedaan panjang palatum lunak, kedalaman nasofaring, dan Need’s ratio pada maloklusi klas I, II, dan III skeletal

Nadya Okta Mulyani, Mimi Marina Lubis

Abstract


ABSTRAK

Pendahuluan: Kasus celah palatum, pembesaran adenoid, Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS), serta maloklusi skeletal kraniofasial sering disertai disfungsi palatum lunak. Penelitian menunjukkan panjang palatum lunak pada laki-laki secara signifikan lebih besar dibanding perempuan, namun tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan dari kedalaman nasofaring serta Need’s ratio antara laki-laki dan perempuan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perbedaan panjang palatum lunak dan kedalaman nasofaring (Need’s ratio) pada maloklusi klas I, II, dan III skeletal, serta perbandingannya antara laki-laki dan perempuan. Metode: Penelitian observasional analitik cross sectional dan menggunakan uji hipotesis dengan sampel sefalogram lateral pasien pada usia 16-40 tahun. Subjek maloklusi skeletal diperoleh melalui pengukuran berdasarkan metode Steiner, kemudian dilakukan pengukuran panjang palatum lunak dan kedalaman nasofaring, serta perhitungan nilai Need’s ratio menggunakan aplikasi Corel-Draw X8. Hasil: Tipe palatum lunak yang paling umum ditemukan pada maloklusi klas I, II, dan III skeletal adalah tipe Leaf shaped. Analisis data dengan uji ANOVA menunjukkan tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan pada panjang palatum lunak (p=0,054), kedalaman nasofaring (p=0,617), dan Need’s ratio (p=0,229) antara maloklusi klas I, II, dan III skeletal. Hasil uji t-independent menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan pada panjang palatum lunak antara laki-laki dan perempuan (p=0,002), akan tetapi tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan pada kedalaman nasofaring (p=0,179) dan Need’s ratio (p=0,130) antara laki-laki dan perempuan. Simpulan: Panjang palatum lunak, kedalaman nasofaring, dan Need’s ratio tidak berbeda pada maloklusi klas I, II, dan III skeletal, Sedangkan antara laki-laki dan perempuan yang berbeda hanya panjang palatum lunak.Kata Kunci : gigi artifisial akrilik; ekstrak kulit manggis; stabilitas warna.

Kata Kunci : palatum lunak, nasofaring, Need’s ratio, maloklusi

The differences of soft palate length, nasopharyngeal depth, and need’s ratio in class I, II, and III skeletal malocclusion

 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Cases of cleft palate, adenoid enlargement, Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS), and craniofacial skeletal malocclusion often accompanied by soft palate dysfunction. Research found the soft palate length in men is significantly higher than women. No significant differences were found in nasopharyngeal depth and Need’s ratio between men and women. The aim of this study is to determine the differences of soft palate length, nasopharyngeal depth, and Need’s ratio in class I, II, and III skeletal malocclusion and its differences between men and women. Method: This research was analytic observational with cross-sectional method using patient’s lateral cephalograms between 16 to 40 years old. The sample in lateral cephalogram were obtained and classified through measurement based on Steiner method. The calculation were determined using Corel-Draw X8 software.  Result: The most common type of soft palate found was leaf shaped type. Data analysis using ANOVA test showed there was no significant differences in the length of soft palate (p=0,054), the depth of nasopharynx (p=0,617), and the Need’s ratio (p=0,229) between class I, II, and III skeletal malocclusion. The result of independent T-test showed there was a significant difference in the length of soft palate between men and women (p=0,002). However, there was no significant difference in nasopharyngeal depth (p=0,179) and Need’s ratio (p=0,130) between men and women. Conclusion: Soft palate length, nasopharyngeal depth, and Need’s ratio had no significant difference in class I, II and III skeletal malocclusion, but there was a significant difference in soft palate length between men and women.

Keywords: soft palate, nasopharynx, Need’s ratio, malocclusion


Keywords


Panjang palatum lunak; Kedalaman nasofaring; Need’s ratio; Maloklusi skeletal;

Full Text:

PDF

References


DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AMR. Clinically Oriented Anatomy 8th ed. Philadelphia. Wolters Kluwer Health; 2018. p. 1485.

Verma P, Verma KG, Kumaraswam KL, Basavaraju S, Sachdeva SK, Juneja S. Correlation of morphological variants of the soft palate and need’s ratio in normal individuals: A digital cephalometric study. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44(3):193–8. DOI:10.5624/isd.2014.44.3.193

Kumar DK, Saraswathi G. Morphological variants of soft palate in normal individuals: A digital cephalometric study. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2012;5(6):1310–3.

Elkunchwar G, Gulve N, Nehete A, Shah K, Aher S. Evaluation of airway in different types of soft palate according to growth pattern. 2018;17(9):53–8. DOI: 10.9790/0853-1709035358

Subramaniam N. Correlation of morphological variants of soft palate and types of occlusion in patients seeking orthodontic assessment. Int J Sci Res. 2017;6(5):1923–6.

Rojas E, Corvalan R, Messen E, Sandoval P. Upper airway assessment in Orthodontics: a review. Odontoestomatologia. 2017;19(3):40–51. DOI: 10.22592/o2017n30a5

Brand RW, Isselhard DE. Anatomy of Orofacial Structures. 15th ed., St. Louis: Elsevier, 2019. h. 6-7, 338-43.

Drake RL, Vogl AW, Mitchell AW. Gray’s Basic Anatomy. 2nd ed., Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2018. p. 569-74, 588-90.

Khoja A. Soft palate dimensions and nasopharyngeal depth (need’s ratio) in different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns: a lateral cephalometric study. Adv Dent Oral Heal. 2018;8(1):1–6. DOI: 10.19080/ADOH.2018.08.555726

Bhambri E. The Association between Soft Palate Shape and Need’s Ratio in Various Skeletal Malocclusion: A Digital Cephalometric Study. Int J Orthod Rehabil. 2018;9:8–13. DOI: 10.4103/ijor.ijor_41_17

Yellinedi R, Damalacheruvu MR. Is There an Optimal Resting Velopharyngeal Gap in Operated Cleft Palate Patients?. Indian J Plast Surg 2013;46(1):87-91.

Jayaprakash P, Modi P, Sapawat P, Thakur R, Choudhari T, Chandrakar J. Correlation of soft palate morphology to growth pattern: A retrospective cephalometric study. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2019;8(7):2468. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_322_19

Gu M, McGrath CPJ, Hägg U, Wong RWK, Yang Y. Anatomy of the upper airway and its growth in childhood. J Dent Oral Biol. 2016;1(1):1-3.

English JD, Akyalcin S, Peltomaki T, Litschel K. Mosby’s. 2nd ed. St.Louis: Elsevier Ltd; 2014. p. 130–1.

Daraze A, Delatte M, Liistro G, Majzoub Z. Cephalometrics of Pharyngeal Airway Space in Lebanese Adults. Int J Dent. 2017. DOI:10.1155/2017/3959456

Dogan E, Isik A, Dogan S. Comparison of pharyngeal airway dimensions between orthodontic malocclusions: A retrospective study. J Int Oral Heal. 2020;12(4):385–93. DOI: 10.4103/jioh.jioh_207_19

Chokotiya H, Banthia A, Srinivasa Rao K, Choudhary K, Sharma P, Awasthi N. A study on the evaluation of pharyngeal size in different skeletal patterns: A radiographic study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19(10):1278–83. DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2417

Lopatienė K, Dabkutė A, Juškevičiūtė V. Vertical and sagittal morphology of the facial skeleton and the pharyngeal airway. Stomatologija. 2016;18(1):21–5.

Perry JL, Kuehn DP, Sutton BP, Gamage JK, Fang X. Anthropometric analysis of the velopharynx and related craniometric dimensions in three adult populations using MRI. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2016;53(1):e1–13. DOI:10.1597/14-015

Guttal KS, Breh R, Bhat R, Burde KN, Naikmasur VG. Diverse morphologies of soft palate in normal individuals: A cephalometric perspective. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2012;24(1):15–9. DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10011-1252

Kollara L, Perry JL, Hudson S. Racial variations in velopharyngeal and craniometric morphology in children: an imaging study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016;59:27–38. DOI:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-14-0236

Gholinia F, Habibi L, Boyouki MA. Cephalometric evaluation of the upper airway in different skeletal classifications of jaws. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(5):E469–74. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005592




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkg.v35i1.38911

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran

INDEXING & PARTNERSHIP

     

      

     

 

Statistik Pengunjung

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran dilisensikan di bawah Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License