Camouflage orthodontic treatment of class I malocclusion with bimaxillary prognathism and risk of apical tooth resorption: a case report

Anggi arlan, Haru Setyo Anggani, Maureen Antolis, Deo Develas

Abstract


Introduction: The primary goal of orthodontic treatment for bimaxillary prognathism is to reduce facial convexity. Treatment options depend on skeletal discrepancies and may involve surgery combined with orthodontics or camouflage orthodontic treatment. However, camouflage orthodontic treatment in cases of severe skeletal discrepancies carries a risk of root resorption. This case report aims to present the orthodontic camouflage treatment of Class I bimaxillary prognathism and its associated risk of root resorption. Case report: A 19-year-old female patient presented with a chief complaint of lower teeth crowding. She had a dolichofacial, symmetrical, and balanced face with a convex profile. The relation of incisor and canine on both the right and left sides was Class I.  The first molar relation of the right side is class I, and the left is class III with 3 mm overjet and 4 mm overbite. The lower midline shifted 2 mm to the left. Spaces requirement of the treatment based on Kesling’s method was a final overjet of 2 mm as follows: Upper Right -4.5 mm, Upper Left -4 mm, Lower Left -5 mm, and Lower right -4 mm. Treatment indication was camouflage orthodontic treatment with extraction using pre-adjusted edgewise MBT 0.022” brackets. The treatments aim to camouflage the convex profile caused by prognathism in both jaws and the degree of protrusion of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth. Conclusion: The orthodontic camouflage treatment for Class I bimaxillary prognathism using extractions and fixed appliances with preadjusted edgewise MBT 0.022” brackets improved facial and smile aesthetics, as well as masticatory function. However, Root resorption occurred as a complication due to maxillary and mandibular incisor intrusion during deep overbite correction over 27 months of treatment.



Perawatan ortodonti kamuflase kasus maloklusi kelas I bimaxillary prognathism dan risiko resorpsi akar gigi: laporan kasus


Pendahuluan: Tujuan utama perawatan ortodonti kasus bimaxillary prognathism adalah mereduksi kecembungan profil wajah pasien. Pilihan perawatan ortodonti kasus bimaxillary prognathism berdasarkan diskrepansi skeletal dapat berupa perawatan kombinasi bedah dan ortodonti atau perawatan ortodonti kamuflase. Tujuan laporan kasus ini adalah melaporkan perawatan ortodonti kamuflase kasus maloklusi kelas I bimaxillary prognathism dan risiko resorpsi akar gigi. Laporan kasus:  Pasien perempuan 19 tahun dengan keluhan gigi bawah tumbuh tidak beraturan. Wajah dolichofacial, simetris dan seimbang dengan profil cembung. Relasi insisif serta kaninus kanan dan kiri kelas I. Relasi molar pertama tetap kanan kelas I dan kiri kelas III dengan overjet 3 mm dan overbite 4 mm. Garis tengah lengkung gigi bawah bergeser ke kiri 2 mm. Kebutuhan ruang menurut metode kesling dengan overjet akhir 2mm sebagai berikut: kanan atas -4,5 mm, kiri atas -4 mm, kiri bawah -5 mm, dan kanan bawah -4 mm. Perawatan ortodonti kamuflase indikasi ekstraksi dengan piranti cekat preadjusted edgewise MBT slot .022”. Tujuan perawatan kasus ini adalah menyamarkan gambaran profil cembung yang disebabkan oleh prognathism pada kedua rahang serta derajat protrusi gigi - gigi anterior rahang atas dan bawah. Paska debonding ditemukan adanya resorpsi akar pada apikal gigi insisif rahang atas dan rahang bawah. Simpulan: Perawatan ortodonti kamuflase kasus maloklusi kelas I bimaxillary prognathism dengan ekstraksi dan piranti cekat braket preadjusted edgewise MBT slot 022”. memberikan perbaikan estetika/profil wajah dan senyum serta mastikasi pasien. Resorpsi akar yang terjadi merupakan komplikasi akibat dari gerakan intrusi insisif rahang atas dan rahang bawah dalam rangka koreksi deep overbite selama 27 bulan perawatan.


Keywords


Maloklusi, bimaxillary prognatism, deepoverbite, intrusi, resorpsi akar

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hoyte T, Ali A, Bearn D. Prevalence of bimaxillary protrusion: a systematic review. Open J Epidem. 2020;11(1):37–46. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojepi.2021.111004

Huang YW, Liang Kuo C, Liu IH, Tsai YL, Wang CL, Yang CH. Orthodontic treatment of severe bimaxillar dentoalveolar protrusion with skeletal class ii malocclusion without using miniscrews. Taiwanese J Orthod. 2022;34(1):60–8. https://doi.org/10.38209/2708-2636.1121

Mukti N, Noviaranny I, Venkiteswaran A, Ghani S. Clinical characteristics of bimaxillary protrusion in different population. Compend Oral Sci. 2017;4(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.24191/cos.v4i0.17508

Tolulase Abosede Yemitan, Tolulope Bolanle Esan, Ummukhaya Titilope Adebayo, Oluwafolakemi Adebusola Egunjobi. Bimaxillary protrusion: A literature review. Int J Biol Pharm Sci Arch. 2022;3(2):141–6. https://doi.org/10.53771/ijbpsa.2022.3.2.0067

Jawale DB, Rodrigues DL, Belludi DA, Ashtekar DS, Patil DA, Rk D. “Treatment of severe crowding and bimaxillary dental protrusion in a patient with angle’s class I malocclusion and a vertical growth pattern” – A Case Report on Orthodontic Camouflage. 2021; https://doi.org/10.36348/sjodr.2021.v06i05.006

Chaudhary NK, Giri J, Gyawali R, Pokharel PR. Bi-maxillary Protrusion: An Orthodontic Management. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2022;20(4):528–31. https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v20i4.54296

Burgaz MA, Eraydın F, Esener SD, Ülkür E. Patient with severe skeletal class ii malocclusion: double jaw surgery with multipiece Le Fort I. Turk J Orthod. 2018;31(3):95–102. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.17039

Raposo R, Peleteiro B, Paço M, Pinho T. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment in class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Inter J Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2018;47(4):445–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.09.003

Incorvati C, Gulotta C, Mirabile FMC, Badiali G, Marchetti C. Current Trends in Skeletal Borderline Patients: Surgical versus Orthodontic Treatment Decisions—What Is the Evidence? Applied Sciences. 2022;12(9):4636. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094636

Araujo MT de S, Squeff LR. Orthodontic camouflage as a treatment alternative for skeletal Class III. Dental Press J Orthod. 2021;26:e21bbo4. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.26.4.e21bbo4

Karnati PKR, Seth P, Zamzuri ATB, Tharwani P. Orthodontically Induced External Apical Root Resorption in Class II Malocclusion. Case Reports in Dentistry. 2021;2021:e8290429. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8290429

Littlewood SJ, Mitchell L. An Introduction to Orthodontics. 5th ed. United Kingdom: OUP Oxford; 2019.

Chen Y, Liu D. Morphologic evaluation of root resorption after miniscrew assisted en mass retraction in adult bialveolar protrusion patients. Head & Face Medicine. 2020;16(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00229-z

Genji L, Varghese RM, Subramaniyan AK. Comparison Of Duration Of Leveling And Aligning In Different Types Of Crowding In Lower Anteriors. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results. 2022;13(8):1255–62. https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S08.155

Martins RP. Early vertical correction of the deep curve of Spee. Dental Press J Orthod. 22(2):118–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.2.118-125.sar

Al-Zoubi EM, Al-Nimri KS. A comparative study between the effect of reverse curve of Spee archwires and anterior bite turbos in the treatment of deep overbite cases: Angle Orthod. 2022;92(1):36–44. https://doi.org/10.2319/020921-117.1

Valarelli F, Carniel R, Cotrin P, Patel M, Cançado R, Freitas KM, et al. Treatment of a Class II Malocclusion with Deep Overbite in an Adult Patient Using Intermaxillary Elastics and Spee Curve Controlling with Reverse and Accentuated Archwires. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2017;8:672. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_625_17

Alouini O, Knösel M, Blanck-Lubarsch M, Helms HJ, Wiechmann D. Controlling incisor torque with completely customized lingual appliances. J Orofac Orthop. 2020;81(5):328–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-020-00231-9

Singhal C, Goyal V, Singh G, Izhar A, Singh R, Gupta N. To Evaluate and Compare the Rate of Space Closure and Incisor Retraction between Sliding Mechanics and CNA Mushroom Loop Archwire Using Indirect Anchorage. Journal of Contemporary Orthodontics. 3(4):13–8. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jco.2019.034

Ribeiro GLU, Jacob HB. Understanding the basis of space closure in Orthodontics for a more efficient orthodontic treatment. Dental Press J Orthod. 2016;21(2):115–25. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.115-125.sar

Tarvade SM, Agrawal G. Smile analysis: A review Part II. International Journal of Contemporary Dental and Medical Reviews. 2015;1–4. https://doi.org/10.15713/ins.ijcdmr.68

Vishnani R, Gilani R, Singh S, Rathi S, Kathade A. Mini-Screw-Assisted Orthodontic Retraction of Class I Malocclusion in a Bimaxillary Protrusion Patient Using Sliding Mechanics: A Case Report. Cureus. 2024 Apr 5;16(4):e57665. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.57665

Shih-Ying Lin, Kai-Wen Yu, Tai-ting Lai, Chung-Ji Liu, Li-Fang Hsu. Orthodontic Correction of Bimaxillary Protrusion with with Mini-screws in Class II Hyperdivergent Patient. Taiwanese Journal of Orthodontics. 2019;31(2). https://doi.org/10.30036/TJO.201906_31(2).0006

Esmat OA, Dakroury AEE, Hassan A, HamdyAboelfetouh M. The Effect of Intrusive Forces on Root Resorption of Anterior Teeth in Class II Division 2 Deep Bite Cases Induced by Placement of Mini-Screw Implants and Intrusive Archwires. A Randomized Clinical Trial. IOSR J Dent Med Scie (IOSR-JDMS). 2018;17(11):45–55. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1711124555

Maués CPR, Nascimento RR do, Vilella O de V. Severe root resorption resulting from orthodontic treatment: Prevalence and risk factors. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015;20:52–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.20.1.052-058.oar

Sameshima GT, Iglesias-Linares A. Orthodontic root resorption. J World Federat Orthod. 2021;10(4):135–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2021.09.003

Krishnan V. Root Resorption with Orthodontic Mechanics: Pertinent Areas Revisited. Australian Dent J. 2017;62(S1):71–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12483

Dindaroğlu F, Doğan S. Root Resorption in Orthodontics. Turk J Orthod. 2016;29(4):103–8. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.16021




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkg.v36i2.48696

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran

INDEXING & PARTNERSHIP

     

      

     

 

Statistik Pengunjung

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran dilisensikan di bawah Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License