Technological innovation and social construction of Makassar film industry’s production and distribution
Abstract
Background: Cinematography has evolved significantly with technological advancements. In Makassar, Indonesia, film distribution faced challenges due to limited cinemas and competition with imported films. The research explores how technology has transformed film production, distribution, and promotion in Makassar. It addresses gaps in understanding regional cinema’s adaptation to technological changes. Purpose: This research aimed to examine the role of technology in transforming film production and distribution around Makassar. Methods: The study employed qualitative research methods with a case study approach. Data was collected through interviews and observation with key figures in Makassar’s film industry, including producers, directors, and editors. The research applied the Social Construction of Technology (SCoT) theory to analyze how social factors shaped and influenced technology. Results: In pre-production, technology helps with audience research and visual concept design; In the production stage, digital cameras increase image quality and flexibility. In post-production, advanced software allows for better editing and visual effects despite limited local experts; In distribution, it expanded from theaters to streaming platforms, reaching a wider audience. All stages benefit from better collaboration through digital tools. Conclusion: This study found that technology has significantly impacted all stages of filmmaking in Makassar. At the pre-production stage, digital tools facilitate collaboration and audience research. During production, advanced cameras and equipment enhance visual quality and creative possibilities. Post-production benefits from sophisticated editing software, although some processes still require expertise outside the region. Film distribution does not rely on movie theatres; it is distributed through platforms like Netflix, Disney+, Hulu, and Prime Video. Implications: Specifically, findings suggest that regional filmmakers should invest in digital skills and explore diverse distribution channels. Theoretically, the study contributes to understanding how SCoT applies in regional film contexts. It highlights the importance of considering local social dynamics in technological adoption within creative industries.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aletras, N. (2021). Applied research in the production of a genre film: Production design and realization of a school movie. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 7(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.26417/441wvr58c
Alforova, Z., Marchenko, S., Kot, H., Medvedieva, A., & Moussienko, O. (2021). Impact of digital technologies on the development of modern film production and television. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v13n4.72
Alzayani, A. A., & Shah, Z. J. (2016). A study of evolving the camera for video production to support the directors. IJRAR:International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 3(2), 9–13. http://ijrar.com/upload_issue/ijrar_issue_265.pdf
Basu, S. (2023). Three decades of social construction of technology: Dynamic yet fuzzy? the methodological conundrum. Social Epistemology, 37(3), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2022.2120783
Bijker, E. W., Hughes, P. T., & Pinch, J. T. (1993). The social construction of technological systems (First, Vol. 4). The MIT Press.
Boblin, S. L., Ireland, S., Kirkpatrick, H., & Robertson, K. (2013). Using stake’s qualitative case study approach to explore implementation of evidence-based practice. Qualitative Health Research, 23(9), 1267–1275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732313502128
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., Ghosh, S. K., & Chaudhuri, S. (2021). Social customer relationship management factors and business benefits. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-11-2019-1933
Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design (L. Habib, Ed.). Vicki Knight.
García‐Avilés, J. A. (2020). Diffusion of innovation. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology (1–8). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0137
Gibbons, A., & Denton, A. (2024). Sensations and cinema: Reframing the real in democracy and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2024.2395343
Hallström, J. (2022). Embodying the past, designing the future: Technological determinism reconsidered in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09600-2
Klein, H. K., & Kleinman, D. L. (2002). The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27(1), 28–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390202700102
Miles, M. B. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed., Vol. 1). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Moon, S., Jalali, N., & Song, R. (2022). Green-lighting scripts in the movie pre-production stage: An application of consumption experience carryover theory. Journal of Business Research, 140, 332–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.004
Morgan, S. J., Pullon, S. R. H., Macdonald, L. M., McKinlay, E. M., & Gray, B. V. (2017). Case study observational research: A framework for conducting case study research where observation data are the focus. Qualitative Health Research, 27(7), 1060–1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316649160
Nuska, P. (2018). The dslr revolution and its impact on documentary and ethnographic filmmaking. Visual Ethnography, 7(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.12835/ve2018.1-0111
Palanimurugan, P., Sivaprakasam, V., Pooja, M., & Sherlin, S. (2024). The impact of technology on cinematic storytelling. IRE Journal, 7(8), 138–146. https://www.globalmediajournal.com/open-access/the-impact-of-technology-on-cinematic-storytelling.pdf
Pathiranage, Y., Jayatilake, akmini, & Abeysekera, R. (2020). Case study research design for exploration of organizational culture towards corporate performance. International Journal of Comparative Management, 21(3), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.24818/RMCI.2020.3.361
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: or How the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004
Prambudi, Y. C. A. (2010). Institut Film di Yogyakarta [Thesis, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta]. http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/3316/3/2TA12452.pdf
Puspitasari, L., Bajari, A., Hidayat, D. R., & Cho, S. K. (2024). Regional film in the dynamics of the national film industry. ProTVF, 8(2), 116–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24198/ptvf.v8i2.54275
Ramli, M. R. (2016). Dinamika sineas dalam pembuatan film independen [Skripsi]. Universitas Islam Negeri Makassar.
Science and Media Museum. (2020, June 18). Learn about the history and development of cinema, from the Kinetoscope in 1891 to today’s 3D revival. Learn about the History and Development of Cinema, from the Kinetoscope in 1891 to Today’s 3D Revival. https://www.scienceandmediamuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/very-short-history-of-cinema
Ugwu, C. N., & Ze, V. H. U. (2023). Qualitative research. international digital organization for scientific research, 8(1), 20–35.
wadmare, s. v. (2022). the impact of digital technology makes on filmmaking production process. INSIGHT: An Internasional Multilingual Journal of Arts and Humanities, 1(11), 92–103. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377636265_The_Impact_of_Digital_Technology_Makes_on_Filmmaking_Production_Process
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publication.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v12i2.57773
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Lilis Puspitasari, Atwar Bajari, Dadang Rahmat Hidayat, Sung Kyum Cho

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Indexed by:
Editorial Office of Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi:
Faculty of Communication Science, Universitas Padjadjaran
Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia
WA: +6282316731181 (Chat Only)
Telephone: +62227796954
Faxmile: +62227794122
E-mail: jurnal.kajian.komunikasi@unpad.ac.id
Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Supervised by: