Email this article 
Civil society’s communicative agency in strengthening community participation for environmental care in Cisayong
Abstract
Background: The value of environmental awareness in rural communities has increased in recent years, particularly in areas where traditional customs intersect with contemporary ecological concerns. It is evident in the Indonesian village of Cisayong, located in southern West Java. Purpose: This article employed Giddens’ framework to show how civil society promoted environmental awareness in the village. Methods: This research was conducted through observation, FGDs, and in-depth interviews with local leaders in Cisayong Village. Results: The research indicated that civil society emerges from community, religious, and youth leaders who collectively embrace the environment. Moreover, each of these civil societies has effectively communicated messages about environmental awareness and garnered recognition from the village government for their efforts. Conclusion: The village community exhibits distinctive socio-cultural and economic characteristics that limit its ability to address environmental challenges effectively. However, through the initiative of local leaders, these limitations have become opportunities for developing community-based environmental awareness rooted in religion and culture. Implication: This finding suggested the empowerment of local actors as agents of change to build environmentally conscious social structures. Strengthening these initiatives can improve long-term environmental resilience in similar rural contexts.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdelnour, S., Hasselbladh, H., & Kallinikos, J. (2017). Agency and institutions in organization studies. Organization Studies, 38(12), 1775–1792.
Abdulla, K., & Serikbayeva, B. (2025). Civil society and environmental compliance: New empirical evidence. Journal of Civil Society, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2025.2494760
Anam, R. K. (2025). Anthony Giddens’s structuration theory and its relevance with sociology of knowledge. SOCIAL EDU: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 1(2), 73–84.
Anderson, A. (1997). Media, culture and the environment. UCL Press.
Atkinson, L., & Kim, Y. (2015). “I drink it anyway and I know I shouldn’t”: Understanding green consumers’ positive evaluations of norm-violating non-green products and misleading green advertising. Environmental Communication, 9(1), 37–57.
Bakti, I., Zubair, F., & Budiana, H. R. (2023). Participatory communication as the key to successful disaster management in Pangandaran district. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v11i2.49785
Bucchi, M. (2008). Of deficits, deviations and dialogues: Theories of public communication of science. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Handbook of communication of science and technology (pp. 57–76). Routledge.
Burgess, J., Harrison, C. M., & Filius, P. (1998). Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environment and Planning A, 30(8), 1445–1460. https://doi.org/10.1068/a301445
Canary, H. E., & Tarin, C. A. (2017). Structuration theory. The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication, 1–15.
Carbonell-Alcocer, A., Romero-Luis, J., & Gertrudix, M. (2025). The role of communication in environmental awareness according to circular economy stakeholders. Journal of Environmental Management, 374, 124112.
Chaichana, D., Srijuntrapun, P., & Rawang, W. (2019). An integrative framework of environmental education for environmental crisis transformation. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 27(4), 2475–2494.
Du, Y., Wang, X., Brombal, D., Moriggi, A., Sharpley, A., & Pang, S. (2018). Changes in environmental awareness and its connection to local environmental management in water conservation zones: The case of Beijing, China. Sustainability, 10(6), 2087.
Englund, H., Gerdin, J., & Burns, J. (2020). A structuration theory perspective on the interplay between strategy and accounting: Unpacking social continuity and transformation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 73, 101988.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
Gómez, E. J. (2018). Civil society in global health policymaking: a critical review. Globalization and Health, 14(1), 73.
Kamil, I., Abdoellah, O. S., Agustin, H., & Bakti, I. (2021). Dialectic of environmental communication in Indonesian Conservation Area. Environmental Communication, 15(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1819362
Metcalfe, J., & Riedlinger, M. (2019). Public understanding of science: Popularization, perceptions and publics. In D. R. Gruber & L. C. Olman (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and science (pp. 32–46).
Moser, S. C. (2015). Whither the heart (-to-heart)? Prospects for a humanistic turn in environmental communication as the world changes darkly. In The Routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 422–433). Routledge.
Norouzi, A., & Yadollahi, F. (2022). Evaluating environmental awareness and knowledge of rural communities (Case Study: Choghakhor Rural Area). Spatial Planning, 12(1), 33–50.
Ogisi, U. M., & Okumagba, E. O. (2022). The interplay of customs and traditions in protecting environment in Nigeria: Analyzing the Niger delta with perspectives from Alaska, USA and India. J. Legal Ethical & Regul. Isses, 25, 1.
Pemerintah Desa Cisayong. (2022). Profil Desa Cisayong, Kecamatan Cisayong, Tasikmalaya.
Rotar, C. (2024). Effective communication campaigns for environmental issueS. Journal of Romanian Literary Studies, 39, 1035–1038.
Rusnali, A. N. A., Bahfiarti, T., Mau, M., & Faried, M. (2024). Exploring environment communication messages for forest preservation in West Sulawesi, Indonesia. IIUM Journal of Human Sciences, 6(2), 79–87.
Smith, R. J., Muir, R. D. J., Walpole, M. J., Balmford, A., & Leader-Williams, N. (2003). Governance and the loss of biodiversity. Nature, 426, 67–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02025
Sunderlin, W. D., Belcher, B., Santoso, L., Angelsen, A., Burgers, P., Nasi, R., & Wunder, S. (2005). Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: An overview. World Development, 33(9), 1383–1402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.004
Tang, W., & Azman, M. (2024). Enhancing environmental awareness through public awareness programs. Journal of Energy and Environmental Policy Options, 7(2), 10–16.
Turner, J. R., Morris, M., & Atamenwan, I. (2019). A theoretical literature review on adaptive structuration theory as its relevance to human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(3), 289–302.
Van Wessel, M., Hilhorst, D., Schulpen, L., & Biekart, K. (2020). Government and civil society organizations: Close but comfortable? Lessons from creating the Dutch “Strategic Partnerships for Lobby and Advocacy.” Development Policy Review, 38(6), 728–746.
Waddell, S. (2017). Societal learning and change: How governments, business, and civil society are creating solutions to complex multi-stakeholder problems. Routledge.
Yasir, Y., Firzal, Y., Sulistyani, A., & Yesicha, C. (2021). Penta helix communication model through community-based tourism (CBT) for tourism village development in Koto Sentajo, Riau, Indonesia. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.30892/GTG.37316-718
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v13i2.67362
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Iriana Bakti, M.Si., Dian Wardiana Sjuchro, Peace Faustine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Indexed by:
2.png){kind=small}
Editorial Office of Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi:
Faculty of Communication Science, Universitas Padjadjaran
Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia
WA: +6282316731181 (Chat Only)
Telephone: +62227796954
Faxmile: +62227794122
E-mail: jurnal.kajian.komunikasi@unpad.ac.id
Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Supervised by:
