Non-Compliance with Land and Building Tax - Rural and Urban (PBB-P2) in Special Capital Region of Jakarta

Melsa Trinita Situmeang, Vid Adrison

Abstrak


his study evaluates non-compliance of Rural and Urban Land and Building Tax (PBB-P2) in the Special Capital Region of Jakarta. This research is interesting considering the dependence of the Local Government to PBB-P2 revenue. It can be seen from sustainable efforts to maximize PBB-P2 collection. Maximizing property tax collection can be done in two ways, first by increasing the tax rate, and second, by increasing the value of property taxed (tax base). The increase of tax rate or tax base lead to increase in the amount of PBB-P2 borne by citizens as taxpayers (tax liability). This condition can trigger to non-compliance. This study evaluated other factors affecting non-compliance: the location of the property and type of property. This study used panel probit regression method in analizying 275.394 tax ID from tax year 2014 to 2018. The findings show that tax rates, location of property (flooded or flood-free area), and the type of property (apartment or non apartment property) are related to the increase of non-compliance. Only sales value of the property (NJOP) is not related to the non-compliance behaviour.

Kata Kunci


Non-compliance tax; local tax; Land and Building Tax - Rural and Urban (PBB-P2)

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


llingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Taxation: Critical Perspectives on the World Economy, 3, 323–338.

Alm, J., Jackson, B. R., & Mckee, M. (1992). Estimating The Determinants Of Taxpayer Compliance With Experimental Data. National Tax Journal, 45(1), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41788949

Alm, J, Sanchez, I. & Kyklos-Berne -, A. D. J.-, (1995). Economic and noneconomic factors in tax compliance. Researchgate.Net. Retrieved July 30, 2021, from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/James_Alm/publication/4774855_Economic_and_Noneconomic_Factors_in_Tax_Compliance/links/00b495357b9e23ef01000000/Economic-and-Noneconomic-Factors-in-Tax-Compliance

Alm, James. (2019). What Motivates Tax Compliance? Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(2), 353–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12272

Alm, James, Bernasconi, M., Laury, S., Lee, D. J., & Wallace, S. (2017). Culture, compliance, and confidentiality: Taxpayer behavior in the United States and Italy. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.05.018

Clotfelter, C. T. (1983). Tax evasion and tax rates: An analysis of individual returns. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 363–373.

DKI Jakarta Governance. (2011). DKI Jakarta Provincial Regulation Number 16 of 2011 concerning Rural and Urban Land and Building Taxes

Fischel, W. A. (2001). Homevoters, municipal corporate governance, and the benefit view of the property tax. National Tax Journal, 54(1), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2001.1.08

Fisher, Ronald C (2015). State and Local Public Finance. Fourth edition, Routhledge.

Kirchler, E. (2007). The economic psychology of tax behaviour. In The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628238

Mardiasmo. (2011). Perpajakan edisi revisi 2011. Yogyakarta:

Mayo, R., Moore, R., Ricks, K., & St. Onge, H. (2020). Annual State and Local Government Finances Summary: 2018. Figure 2, 4–6. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2018/econ/g18-alfin-summary.html

Muehlbacher, S., Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., Ashby, J., Berti, C., Job, J., Kemp, S., Peterlik, U., Roland-Lévy, C., & Waldherr, K. (2008). Hard-earned income and tax compliance: A survey in eight nations. European Psychologist, 13(4), 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.298

Nabati, A. R., & Mahi, B. R. (2018). Intervensi Perilaku Kepatuhan Pajak : Surat Teguran Penyampaian Surat Pemberitahuan Pajak Tax Compliance Behavioral Intervention : Tax Reminder Letters for Tax Return ’ s Filing. 8, 87–106.

Pamungkas, D. D. (2019). Kebijakan Sanksi Administrasi BPHTB Untuk Pemberian Hak Baru Atas Tanah Di Provinsi DKI Jakarta Dalam Perspektif collaborative governance. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 2(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v2i1.21794

Rahmawaty, W., & Rosdiana, H. (2019). Analisis tax expenditure dalam Rangka Impor Dari Perspektif pro-corporate cash flow tax. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 2(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v2i1.21770.

Republic of Indonesia. (2004). Law Number 32 of 2004 concerning Regional Government

Republic of Indonesia. (2009). Law Number 28 of 2009 concerning Regional Taxes and Levies

Slack, E. (2010). The Property Tax in Theory and Practice * Munk School of Global Affairs. Finance, September.

Slack, E., & Bird, R. M. (2014). OECD Working Papers on Fiscal The Political Economy of Property Tax Reform. OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism, OECD Publishing, 18.

Wahl, I., Kastlunger, B., & Kirchler, E. (2010). Trust in authorities and power to enforce tax

Widiastuti, R & Laksito, H. (2014). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi Kepatuhan Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan (Studi Pada WPOP di Kabubaten Klaten). Diponegoro Journal of accounting. (Undip E-Journal. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting/article/view/6163




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v5i2.37020

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.




 Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Indexed By:

Google Scholar  Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) WorldCat Indonesia One Search          
 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.