The Governance Reform In The Coaching Services Of Prisoners In The Correction Centers (A Study At The Sukamiskin Class I Correction Center)
Abstrak
In general, the problems of LAPAS in Indonesia are regarding overcapacity and facilities that are not up to standard. However, in Class 1 Sukamiskin LAPAS, among other problems, there are interesting problems to study after the reform. The purpose of this study was to analyze coaching services after governance reform was carried out at Class 1 Sukamiskin Correctional Institution. What improvements have occurred in coaching services at Class 1 Sukamiskin LAPAS need to be studied in more depth because coaching is a very important service. Some aspects of the coaching carried out in governance reform at Class 1 Sukamiskin prison are coaching in the form of spiritual activities, fulfillment of remission rights, assimilation, parole leave, parole, and leave before release, and sports activities. Governance reform at Class 1 Sukamiskin LAPAS was carried out through several effective stages. The success of governance reform in coaching services needs to be investigated because it is very important to know the implementation process. This research uses a descriptive qualitative method with a case study approach at Sukamiskin Class 1 LAPAS. Informants in this study were LAPAS leadership officials, LAPAS staff officers, prisoners and visitors. The results of this study are that there is an increase in coaching services in the form of spiritual activities, an increase in the fulfillment of remission rights, assimilation, parole leave, parole leave, and leave before being released online, the implementation of sports activities becomes more systematic and directed. The results of this study indicate that there is a positive impact from governance reform in Class 1 Sukamiskin LAPAS being able to realize an increase in coaching services through organizational structure changes and change management.
Kata Kunci
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Andhika et. al. (2016). Tugas dan Kewenangan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Ambarawa dalam Pembinaan Narapidana sebagai Wujud Perlindungan Narapidana sebagai Warga Negara. Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(3), 1-16.
Bennett, Jamie. (2017). “Justice and Penal Reform: Re-Shaping the Penal Landscape”. Prison Service Journal Special Edition the Future of Prisons, 231, 45-46.
Creswell, Jhon W. (2016). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Goetz, Anne Marie. (2005). Managing Successful Governance Reforms: Lessons of Design and Implementation Conceptual Framework. UK. University of Sussex
Haryono. (2016). Pelaksanaan Reformasi Birokrasi di Kementerian Hukum dan HAM. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 10(3), 227-242.
Hasibuan, Malayu. (2002). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Hikmawati, Puteri. (2018). “Mendesaknya Perbaikan Pengelolaan Lapas Pasca Penangkapan Kepala Lapas Sukamiskin”. Info singkat 10 (15), 1-6.
Lynn, Lawrence E., Carolyn J. Heinrich, and Carolyn J. Hill. (2000). “Studying Governance and Public Management: Challenges and Prospects”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 233-262.
Lynn, Lawrence E., Carolyn J. Heinrich, and Carolyn J. Hill. (2001). Improving Governance: A New Logic for Empirical Research. Washinton DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
Martoyo, Susilo. (2000). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jogjakarta: BPFE.
Miriti, Gilbert M. and Kimani, Martin Wohoro. (2017). “Analysis of Prisons Rehabilitation Programs on Behavior Reformation of Offenders in Kenya: A Case Study of Kisumu Main Prison”. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 6(6), 59-85.
Mudjia Rahardjo. (2017). Studi Kasus dalam Penelitian Kualitatif: Konsep dan Prosedurnya. Malang. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
Permana dan Rudatyo. (2017). Pelaksanaan Sistem Layanan Kunjungan bagi Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan di Rumah Tahanan Negara Wonogiri, Dalam Rangka Peningkatan Pelayanan Kepada Publik Berdasarkan UU No 12 Tahun 1995 Tentang Pemasyarakatan. Surakarta. Seminar Nasional dan Call for Paper UNIBA.
Raymund E. Narag and Clarke R. Jones. (2017). Understanding Prison Management in the Philippines: A Case for Shared Governance. The Prison Journal, 97(1), 3-26.
Sandro Cabral and Paulo F. Azevedo. (2008). The Modes of Provision of Prison Services in a Comparative Perspective. Brazilian Administration Review, 5(1), 53-69.
Satryawati and Saniah. (2012). “Peranan Tes Psikologi Terhadap Penempatan Pegawai Pada Politeknik Negeri Samarinda”. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 08(2): 2-5.
Sedarmayanti. (2009). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Reformasi Birokrasi dan Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
Tritton, Pieter and Fleetwood, Jennifer. (2017). “An Insider’s View of Prison Reform in Ecuador Journal Prison Service, Special Edition Informal Dynamics of Survival in Latin American Prisons”. Prison Service Journal, 299, 40-44.
Victor J. St. John et.al. (2019). Architecture and Correctional Services: A Facilities Approach to Treatment. The Prison Journal 99(6), 748-770.
Werther, William B. & Keith Davis. (1996). Human Resources and Personal Management. Edisi Kelima. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Yuniarto, Topan. (2018). Politik dan Hukum. Litbang Kompas. Jakarta.
Zainal Arifin. (2012). Penelitian Pendidikan Metode dan Paradigma Baru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
Zakki, dkk. (2014). “Pengaruh Seleksi terhadap Penempatan”. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 14(1): 1-10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v6i2.45232
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Indexed By:



This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.