Can Smart Governance Works in Traditional Indigenous Markets?

Denny Andriana

doi:10.24198/jmpp.v6i2.45791

Can Smart Governance Works in Traditional Indigenous Markets?

Denny Andriana

Abstrak

One of the underlying characteristics of a “smart governance” notion is responsive government. The public expects the government to be its receptive partner. However, prior research has indicated that a growing lack of public trust in government is a common phenomenon in most developing countries; thus, expecting a responsive government is difficult. This paper aims to determine whether smart governance works in traditional indigenous markets, known as pasar, in Indonesia. The study employs a qualitative case-study method. A semi-structured interview of pasar key informants gathered empirical evidence for the case study. The findings indicate that the bureaucratic culture, via the role of supervisory boards, in Pasar has restrained the managers’ responsiveness to public demands. Consequently, complaints that surface in Pasar cannot be solved immediately. In conclusion, it can be said that they cannot implement smart governance in Pasar.

Kata Kunci

Responsive; Indigenous Markets; Semistructured; Smart Governance

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi

Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21.

Anttiroiko, A.-V., Valkama, P., & Bailey, S. J. (2014). Smart Cities in the New Service Economy: Building Platforms for Smart Smart cities in the new service economy: building platforms for smart services. AI & Society, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0464-0

Aziz, M. A. bin A., Said, J., & Alam, Md. M. (2015). An Assessment of the Practices of Leadership Quality in the Public Sectors of Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31(15), 909–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01191-0

Barber, B. R. (2013). If Mayors Ruled the World: Dysfunctional Nations, Rising Cities. Yale University Press.

Bardhan, P. (2002). Decentralization of governance and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533002320951037

Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing–Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.

Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G., & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. European Physical Journal: Special Topics, 214(1), 481–518. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3

Bernard, H. R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). Altamira Press.

Bifulco, F., Tregua, M., Amitrano, C. C., & D’Auria, A. (2016). ICT and sustainability in smart cities management. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(2), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2015-0132

Blair, H. (2000). Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries. World Development, 28(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00109-6

Blandford, A. (2013). Semi-structured qualitative studies. In: Soegaard, Mads and Dam, Rikke Friis (eds.). "The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed. Aarhus, Denmark: The Interaction Design Foundation.

Bolívar, M. P. R., & Meijer, A. J. (2016). Smart Governance: Using a Literature Review and Empirical Analysis to Build a Research Model. Social Science Computer Review, 34(6), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315611088

Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private management: what’s the difference? Journal of Management Studies, 39(January), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00284

Burki, S. J., Perry, G., & Dillinger, W. (1999). Beyond the center: Decentralizing the state. The World Bank.

Choerudin, A., Dewi, S. N., Haryanto, A. T., & Latifah, I. (2018). Traditional Market Management Model-Based Public Participation: An Empirical Studies in Indonesia. International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 10(4), 151–157.

Clark, T., Foster, L., Sloan, L., & Bryman, A. (2021). Bryman’s Social Research Methods (Sixth Edition). Oxford University Press.

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Revisiting mixed methods and advancing scientific practices. The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry.

Dameri, R. P., & Benevolo, C. (2016). Governing Smart Cities: An Empirical Analysis. Social Science Computer Review, 34(6), 693–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315611093

Demirel, D., & Mülazımoğlu, M. E. (2022). How the smart governance model shapes cities? Cases from Europe. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 16(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-08-2021-0115

Dimelli, D. (2016). Can Greek cities be smart? Journal of Regional Socio-Economics Issues, 3(2), 8–22.

Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12028

Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., & Mair, J. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2014.09.001

Elfil, M. and Negida, A. (2017) ‘Sampling methods in clinical research; an educational review’, Emergency, 5(1), pp. 1–3.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing

Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A., & Nam, T. (2015). What makes a city smart? Identifying core components and proposing an integrative and comprehensive conceptualization. Information Polity, 20(1), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-150354

Goetz, A. M., & Jenkins, R. (2001). Hybrid forms of accountability: Citizen engagement in institutions of public-sector oversight in India. Public Management Review, 3(3), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616670110051957

Goodin, R. E. (2003). Democratic Accountability: The Third Sector and All. In Crisis of Governance: The Nonprofit/Non-Governmental Sector (No. 19). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.418262

Grossi, G., & Thomasson, A. (2015). Bridging the accountability gap in hybrid organizations: the case of Copenhagen Malmö Port. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(3), 604–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314548151

Hermawan, F., Ismiyati, I., & Indarto, H. (2018). Towards a competitive traditional market through infrastructure performance and redefinition categories: a case in Semarang city. MATEC Web of Conferences, 195. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819506014

Jack, E. P., & Raturi, A. S. (2006). Lessons learned from methodological triangulation in management research. Management Research News, 29(6), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170610683833

Kickert, W. J. M. (2001). Public management of hybrid organizations: Governance of quasi-autonomous executive agencies. International Public Management Journal, 4(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7494(01)00049-6

Koppenjan, J., & Klijn, E.-H. (2004). Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network approach to problem solving and decision making. Routledge.

Law Number 22 on Local Government, Pub. L. No. 22 (1999).

Law Number 32 on Local Government, Pub. L. No. 32 (2004).

Law Number 23 on Local Government, Pub. L. No. 23 (2014).

Law Number 9 on the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 2014 on Local Government, Pub. L. No. 9 (2015).

Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660325.

Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: a practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (AISHE-J), 8(3), 3351–33514. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2014.2306979.

Mainardes, E. W., Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2012). A model for stakeholder classification and stakeholder relationships. Management Decision, 50(10), 1861–1879. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211279648.

Manor, J. (1999). The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization. The World Bank.

Massaro, M., Dumay, J., & Garlatti, A. (2015). Public sector knowledge management: a structured literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(3), 530–558. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2014-0466.

McLeod, R. H., & Harun, H. (2014). Public Sector Accounting Reform at Local Government Level in Indonesia. Financial Accountability and Management, 30(2), 238–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12035

Mimba, N. P. S. H., Helden, G. J. Van, & Tillema, S. (2007). Public sector performance measurement in developing countries: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Vol. 3, pp. 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/1832591071082026.

Najib, M. F., & Sosianika, A. (2017). Retail Service Quality in Indonesia: Traditional Market Vs. Modern Market. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 21(2), 1–12.

Nasution, A. (2016). Government Decentralization Program in Indonesia. In ADBI Working Paper Series (No. 601; Issue October).

Nickson, D., Warhurst, C., & Dutton, E. (2005). The importance of attitude and appearance in the service encounter in retail and hospitality. Managing Service Quality, 15(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520510585370

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Özmen, V. (2014). Breast cancer in Turkey: clinical and histopathological characteristics (analysis of 13.240 patients). The Journal of Breast Health, 10(2).

Pereira, G. V., Parycek, P., Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018). Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review. In Information Polity (Vol. 23, Issue 2, pp. 143–162). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170067

Powell Jr, G. B. (2004). Political representation in comparative politics. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 7, 273–296.

Prabowo, F. S. A., & Rahadi, R. A. (2015). David vs. Goliath: Uncovering The Future of Traditional Markets in Indonesia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5p28

Purnomo, B. S., Sofia, A., Andriana, D., & Apandi, R. N. N. (2016). Developing Traditional Market Standard : A Socio- Economics-Environment Approach. 1st Global Conference on Business, Management and Entreupreuneurship, 15, 765–769.

Rahman, Md. M. (2019). 21st Century Skill “Problem Solving”: Defining the Concept. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(1), 71–81.

Royo, S., & Yetano, A. (2015). “Crowdsourcing” as a tool for e-participation: Two experiences regarding CO2 emissions at municipal level. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(3), 323–348.

Ruhlandt, R. W. S. (2018). The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review. Cities, 81(October 2017), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.014

Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to Identify Themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569

Salminen, A., & Lehto, K. (2012). Accountable to whom? Exploring the challenge of multiple accountabilities in Finnish public administration. Halduskultuur - Administrative Culture, 13(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-6505(01)00162-1

Santos, E., Albo, J., & Irabien, A. (2014). Magnetic ionic liquids: synthesis, properties and applications. Rsc Advances, 4(75), 40008–40018. https://doi.org/10.1039/x0xx00000x

Sawir, M., Robo, S., Abubakar, F., & Kamaluddin., S. (2023). Implementation Of Public Services In The Digital Era As A Public Information Media Regional Government Of Jayapura Regency, Papua Province. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 6 (2), 212-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v6i2.45532.

Scholl, H. J., & Scholl, M. C. (2014). Smart Governance: A Roadmap for Research and Practice. IConference, March, 163–176. https://doi.org/10.9776/14060

Septiari, E. D., & Kusuma, G. H. (2016). Understanding the Perception of Millennial Generation toward Traditional Market (A Study In Yogyakarta). Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 5(1), 30–43. http://sibresearch.org/uploads/2/7/9/9/2799227/riber_h15-024_30-43.pdf

Setianto, T., Ningrum S., & Muhafidin, D. (2021). Implementation of Government Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) in Indonesian Local Government (Case of Regional Development Planning Board of Sukabumi Regency). Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 5(1), 59-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v3i2.25342.

Sipahutar, M. A. (2016). Effects of Credit on Economic Growth, Unemployment and Poverty. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 17(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.23917/jep.v17i1.1651

Stimson, J. A., Mackuen, M. B., & Erikson, R. S. (1995). Dynamic Representation. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 543–565. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082973

Stratigea, A., Papadopoulou, C.-A., & Panagiotopoulou, M. (2015). Tools and technologies for planning the development of smart cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(2), 43–62.

Suryadarma, D., Poesoro, A., Akhmadi, Budiyati, S., Rosfadhila, M., & Suryahadi, A. (2010). Traditional food traders in developing countries and competition from supermarkets: Evidence from Indonesia. Food Policy, 35(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.11.002

Tomor, Z., Meijer, A., Michels, A., & Geertman, S. (2019). Smart Governance For Sustainable Cities: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Urban Technology, 26(4), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2019.1651178

Willke, H. (2007). Smart Governance: Governing the Global Knowledge Society. Campus Verlag.

Wynn-Williams, K. L. H. (2005). Performance assessment and benchmarking in the public sector: An example from New Zealand. Benchmarking, 12(5), 482–492. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770510619393

Zheng, Y. (2015). Trajectory data mining: An overview. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 6(3), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/2743025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v6i2.45791