The Negotiation Stage: Decision Process of Public Service Innovation for Community Complaints in Pekanbaru

Eko Handrian, Roni Ekha Putera, Asrinaldi Asrinaldi, Aidinil Zetra

Abstrak


The diffusion of innovations in public service contexts regularly involves various yet complex challenges that require a deep understanding of the dynamics of the adoption, spread, and application of new ideas. Persuasion may no longer be fully expected to influence the adoption of innovation, so this article aims to analyze negotiation as an important part of the innovation-decision process for public complaint services in Pekanbaru (city). This research applies qualitative methods with data collection techniques through interviews, documentation, and observation. All data that have been collected are then analyzed through data reduction, data presentation, and data conclusions. The research results show that the negotiation stage is an important part of the innovation decision process, negotiation is a key element in facilitating the adoption of innovation in the context of public services, through negotiation stakeholders can interact with each other and reach agreement. Conflicts of interest, sectoral egos, and limited resources make negotiation important in the innovation diffusion stage of the innovation-decision process to create agreement and sustainability.


Kata Kunci


Negotiation; Diffusion; Innovation; Public Service;

Teks Lengkap:

PDF (English)

Referensi


Agolla, J. E., & Lill, J. B. Van. (2013). Public Sector Innovation Drivers: A Process Model. Journal of Social Sciences, 34(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2013.11893128

ARISAWA, E. D., & MOREIRA, M. F. (2019). Duas décadas de premiação, quantas de inovação? O papel da difusão no Prêmio Enap. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 17(4), 988–1001. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395174414

Attour, A., & Chaupain-Guillot, S. (2020). Digital Innovations in Public Administrations: Technological or Policy Innovation Diffusion? Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, n° 31(1), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0061

Barchi, M., & Greco, M. (2018). Negotiation in Open Innovation: A Literature Review. Group Decision and Negotiation, 27(3), 343–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9568-8

Bouché, V., & Volden, C. (2011). Privatization and the diffusion of innovations. Journal of Politics, 73(2), 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611000041

Buchheim, L., Krieger, A., & Arndt, S. (2020). Innovation types in public sector organizations: a systematic review of the literature. Management Review Quarterly, 70, 509–533.

Busch, P. A., Henriksen, H. Z., & Sæbø, Ø. (2018). Opportunities and challenges of digitized discretionary practices: a public service worker perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 547–556.

Choudrie, J., & Culkin, N. (2013). A qualitative study of innovation diffusion: The novel case of a small firm and KTP. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(4), 889–912. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-03-2012-0047

Cordella, A., & Bonina, C. M. (2012). A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 512–520.

Darojat, A., Ekowati, D., & Usman, I. (2020). How supply chain regulates the innovations study of diffusion in public service organizations? Recommendations of reform. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(4), 363–370.

De Vries, H., Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2018). The Diffusion and Adoption of Public Sector Innovations: A Meta-Synthesis of the Literature. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(3), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvy001

Djellal, F., Gallouj, F., & Miles, I. (2013). Two decades of research on innovation in services: Which place for public services? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 98–117.

Edwards-Schachter, M. (2018). The nature and variety of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2(2), 65–79.

Erdem, S., & Thompson, C. (2014). Prioritising health service innovation investments using public preferences: A discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-360

Feller, I. (1980). Managerial Response to Technological Innovation in Public Sector Organizations. Management Science, 26(10), 1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.26.10.1021

Ghobakhloo, M., Hong, T. S., Sabouri, M. S., & Zulkifli, N. (2012). Strategies for successful information technology adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises. Information, 3(1), 36–67.

Glumac, B., Han, Q., & Schaefer, W. (2018). A negotiation decision model for public–private partnerships in brownfield redevelopment. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(1), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813516668854

Hartmann, A., Reymen, I. M. M. J., & Van Oosterom, G. (2008). Factors constituting the innovation adoption environment of public clients. Building Research and Information, 36(5), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210802028386

Haynes, P. (2015). Managing complexity in the public services. Routledge.

History, A. (2024). Public Policy Innovation in Objectifying Excellent Service. 08(01).

Hsu, K. M., & Tung-Wen Sun, M. (2014). Policy diffusion and public service motivation: an exploratory study of the Bookstart programme in Taiwan. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 7(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2014.894901

Janssen, M., Konopnicki, D., Snowdon, J. L., & Ojo, A. (2017). Driving public sector innovation using big and open linked data (BOLD). Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9746-2

Jonck, P., & Walt, F. van der. (2016). Juxtaposing South Africa’s Private Sector and Its Public Service Regarding Innovation Diffusion, to Explore the Obstacles to E-Governance. International Journal of Humanities and …, 10(1), 249–255. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Freda-Van-Der-Walt/publication/291336403_Juxtaposing_South_Africa’s_Private_Sector_and_Its_Public_Service_Regarding_Innovation_Diffusion_to_Explore_the_Obstacles_to_E-Governance/links/56a0769c08ae21a56429199c/Juxtaposi

Junginger, S. (2013). Design and innovation in the public sector: Matters of design in policy-making and policy implementation. Annual Review of Policy Design, 1(1), 1–11.

Kusumasari, B., Pramusinto, A., Santoso, A. D., & Fathin, C. A. (2019). What shapes public sector innovation? Public Policy and Administration, 18(4), 430–446. https://doi.org/10.13165/VPA-19-18-4-05

Lambright, W. H. (1980). Decision-making for Urban Technology. Policy Sciences, 11(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136003

Lawther, W. (2006). The Growing use of Competitive Negotiations to Increase Managerial Capability: The Acquisition of e-Government Services. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.2753/pmr1530-9576300204

Liu, L. C. (2022). Policy innovation and public organizational performance: a moderated mediation analysis of Taiwan’s Bookstart program. Public Management Review, 24(11), 1824–1845. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1942530

MacVaugh, J., & Schiavone, F. (2010). Limits to the diffusion of innovation: A literature review and integrative model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), 197–221.

Manajemen, J., Publik, P., Supriyanto, D., Kertati, I., & Wirasati, W. (2023). Improving Public Services : Exploring Hybrid Population Administration Service Innovations in Malang Regency. 07(02).

Meade, N., & Islam, T. (2006). Modelling and forecasting the diffusion of innovation–A 25-year review. International Journal of Forecasting, 22(3), 519–545.

Mellett, H., Marriott, N., & Macniven, L. (2009). Diffusion of an accounting innovation: Fixed asset accounting in the NHS in Wales. European Accounting Review, 18(4), 745–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180903118710

Meuleman, L. (2021). Public administration and governance for the SDGs: Navigating between change and stability. Sustainability, 13(11), 5914.

Micó, J. L., Masip, P., & Domingo, D. (2013). To wish impossible things* Convergence as a process of diffusion of innovations in an actor-network. International Communication Gazette, 75(1), 118–137.

Mikhaylov, S. J., Esteve, M., & Campion, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the public sector: opportunities and challenges of cross-sector collaboration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2128), 20170357.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.

Nasikhah, N., Wijaya, G., & Rahayu, T. P. (2022). Chatbot for Public Relations and Customer Service in Indonesia: A Diffusion Innovation Study. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 21(3), 278–290. https://doi.org/10.5614/sostek.itbj.2022.21.3.5

Priyanto, H. (2024). Public Service Quality in Banyuwangi District : A Study in Welfare Perspective. 08(1).

Qiu, H., & Chreim, S. (2022). A tension lens for understanding public innovation diffusion processes. Public Management Review, 24(12), 1873–1893. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1942532

Rajavel, R., & Thangarathinam, M. (2015). Optimizing Negotiation Conflict in the Cloud Service Negotiation Framework Using Probabilistic Decision Making Model. Scientific World Journal, 2015(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/858975

Rogers, E. M. (1981). Diffusion of innovations: An overview. Use and Impact of Computers in Clinical Medicine, 113–131.

Sinclair, S., Mazzei, M., Baglioni, S., & Roy, M. J. (2018). Social innovation, social enterprise, and local public services: Undertaking transformation? Social Policy & Administration, 52(7), 1317–1331.

Sousa, M. J., & Rocha, Á. (2021). Decision-Making and Negotiation in Innovation & Research in Information Science. Group Decision and Negotiation, 30(2), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09712-z

Starke, P. (2013). Qualitative methods for the study of policy diffusion: Challenges and available solutions. Policy Studies Journal, 41(4), 561–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12032

Sundström, E., Karlsson, J., & Camén, C. (2017). Service innovation as a political process. Service Industries Journal, 37(5–6), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2017.1322960

van Bruggen, A., Nikolic, I., & Kwakkel, J. (2019). Modeling with stakeholders for transformative change. Sustainability, 11(3), 825.

Wicaksono, K. W. (2019). TIPOLOGI INOVASI SEKTOR PUBLIK PADA TIGA PROGRAM INOVATIF PEMERINTAH DAERAH KOTA SURABAYA (Tinjauan Reflektif terhadap Tiga Inovasi Pelayanan Publik Pemerintah Kota Surabaya Tahun 2018). Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 1(2), 196. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v1i2.19895

Zaki, A., Zulkarnain, I., Jeddawi, ✉ Murtir, Wasistiono, S., & Lukman, S. (2022). Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies Public Service Innovation in the Era of the Covid-19 Pandemi in Tangerang District, Banten. 47–52. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v8i2.53488

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.




 Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Indexed By:

Google Scholar  Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) WorldCat Indonesia One Search          
 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.