Bibliometric Analysis of Heterarchy: Toward a Paradigm Shift in Public Administration Studies

Imanudin Kudus; Heru Nurasa; Ida Widianingsih; Nina Karlina; Jayum Anak Jawan

doi:10.24198/jmpp.v8i2.54227

Bibliometric Analysis of Heterarchy: Toward a Paradigm Shift in Public Administration Studies

Imanudin Kudus, Heru Nurasa, Ida Widianingsih, Nina Karlina, Jayum Anak Jawan

Abstrak

The study of public administration developed from the Old Public Administration to the New Public Service, bringing management and public organizations to shift from the traditional paradigm to the modern paradigm. Organizations were originally seen as machines that emphasized hierarchy. The modern perspective states that hierarchy is no longer an effective organizational strategy. The new public administration steered organizations toward collaboration, consensus, and democratic management to encourage the development of a heterarchical approach. The research results were visualized using bibliographic research methodology and the VOSviewer program. Access Scopus database data using the following keywords, title-abs-key (" heterarchy ") and ((pubstage (pubstage ") and (limit-to (doctype, "ar") and (limit-to (language, "English") and (limittoes (srctype, "j"). The research results provide an overview of the quality and quantity of articles about heterarchy around the world. Global trends indicate high interest in this research topic. In addition, the works that have been published are of good quality, marked by a high number of citations. To find novelty, the author tries to take topics that are still rarely researched. Apart from that, to get a big chance of publication, the author considers several aspects, such as country, affiliation, influential journals.

Kata Kunci

Public Administration; Public Organization; Hierarchy; Heterarchy; Bibliometric

Teks Lengkap:

PDF (English)

Referensi

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Bruce, K., & Nyland, C. (2011). Elton mayo and the deification of human relations. Organization Studies, 32(3), 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610397478

Crumley, C. L. (1995). Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 6(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1525/ap3a.1995.6.1.1

Daniels, D, T., Spiker, K, B., Papa, & J., M. (1997). Perspective on Organizational Communication 4th. McGraw-Hill.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.

Eck, N. J. van, & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2).

Farrell, C., Hatcher, W., & Diamond, J. (2022). Reflecting on Over 100 Years of Public Administration Education. Public Administration, 100. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12808

Frederickson, George, H., & Smith, K. B. (2003). The Public Administration Theory Primer. Westview Press.

Frederickson, H. G. (1996). Comparing te Reinventng Government Movement wit he New PublcAdmiistradon. Public Administration Review, 56(3), 263–270.

Freeman, R. E. E., & McVea, J. (2005). A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management. SSRN Electronic Journal, January. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.263511

Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (Second Edi). Sage Publishing.

Gryszkiewicz, A., & Chen, F. (2010). Design requirements for information sharing in a crisis management command and control centre. ISCRAM 2010 - 7th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management: Defining Crisis Management 3.0, Proceedings, May, 1–10.

Halibas, A. S., Sibayan, R. O., & Maata, R. L. R. (2017). The penta helix model of innovation in Oman: An hei perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 12, 159–172.

Hedlund, G. (1986). Hypemodem MNC-A Heterarchy ? 25(1), 9–35.

Indahsari, C. L., & Raharja, S. J. (2020). New Public Management (NPM) as an Effort in Governance. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 03(2), 73–81.

Jolanta Bieńkowska. (2016). Evolution of Organizational Power. China-USA Business Review, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.17265/1537-1514/2016.06.003

Kahfi, A. A., Rizal, M., & Herawati, T. (2022). Pemetaan bibliometrik dengan VOSviewer terhadap perkembangan hasil penelitian implementasi good corporate governance. Research Journal of Accounting and Business Management (RJABM). https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12621

Katzell, R. A. (2014). New Patterns of Management . by Rensis Likert Review by : Raymond A . Katzell. 8(2), 273–275.

Kotler, P., & Caslione, J. (2009). More Praise for Chaotics from Around the World. In International Business.

Leminen, S., Rajahonka, M., Westerlund, M., & Wendelin, R. (2018). The future of the Internet of Things: toward heterarchical ecosystems and service business models. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 33(6), 749–767. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-10-2015-0206

Lynn, L. E. (2001). The myth of the bureaucratic paradigm: What traditional public administration really stood for. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00016

McAllister, J.T., Lennertz, L., & Atencio Mojica, Z. (2022). Mapping A Discipline: A Guide to Using VOSviewer for Bibliometric and Visual Analysis. Science and Technology Libraries, 41(3), 319–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2021.1991547

McCulloch, W. S. (1945). A heterarchy of values determined by the topology of nervous nets. In The Embodiment to Mind. MIT Press.

Meske, C., Kissmer, T., & Stieglitz, S. (2020). Bridging formal barriers in digital work environments – Investigating technology-enabled interactions across organizational hierarchies. Telematics and Informatics, 48(January), 101342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101342

Orduña-Malea, E. & Costas, R. (2021). Link-based approach to study scientific software usage: the case of VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 126(9), 8153–8186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04082-y

Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., Bansal, P. (2016). The long-term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1615–1631

Petres, T. J., & Waterman, R. H. (2006). Dalam mencari keunggulan: Pelajaran dari perusahaan yang dikelola terbaik di Amerika. Harper Bisnis.

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing.

Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2008). Understanding government: Four intellectual traditions in the study of public administration. Public Administration, 86(4), 925–949. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00742.x

Reihlen, M. (1996). The Logic of Heterarchies The Logic of Heterarchies. 91, 20.

Saputra, T., Zuhdi, S., Aguswan, Affrian, R., Eka, Sufi, W., & Harahap, J. R. (2023). Bibliometric Studies and Public Administration Research Potential on Stunting Problems. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 06(02). https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v3i2.45671

Sikorski, C., & Bienkowska, J. (2021). Przestrze ń organizacyjna a efektywno ść organizacji. May.

Stein, G. (2010). Mengelola orang dan organisasi: Warisan Peter Drucker. Emerald Group.

Stephenson, K. (2009). Neither Hierarchy nor Network: An Argument for Heterarchy. People & Strategy, 32(1), 10–11.

Susanti, E., Nurasa, H., & Widianingsih, I. (2019). Power Imbalances in Collective Decision-Making: The Study of Minimum Wage Setting Cases. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 22(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.22146/JSP.35997

Utama, Y. J., Setiyoni, B., Jamari, Tauviqirrahman, M., & Susanto, H. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of publications in the scopus database: Astudy at Diponegoro University during 2014-2018. E3S Web of Conferences 125

W., P. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12(March), 295–336.

Weber, M. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Oxford University Press.

Widianingsih, I., Paskarina, C., Riswanda, R., & Putera, P. B. (2021). Evolutionary Study of Watershed Governance Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Science and Technology Libraries, 40(4), 416–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2021.1926401

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v8i2.54227