Evaluation of Public Services on Community Satisfaction at the Regional Secretariat of Kepulauan Riau Province

Nur Ilmiah Rivai

doi:10.24198/jmpp.v9i2.55351

Evaluation of Public Services on Community Satisfaction at the Regional Secretariat of Kepulauan Riau Province

Nur Ilmiah Rivai

Abstrak

This study aims to evaluate the quality of public services provided by the DPRD Secretariat of the Kepulauan Riau Province using a descriptive qualitative approach. The analysis is based on secondary data from the 2023 Government Performance Accountability Report (LAKIP), particularly focusing on the Community Satisfaction Index (IKM). The study interprets quantitative performance metrics through a qualitative lens using the Results-Based Evaluation (RBE) framework, examining nine service elements including service procedures, responsiveness, competency, infrastructure, and complaint handling. Respondents reported a high level of satisfaction across most service dimensions, with eight out of nine elements categorized as “Very Satisfied” based on national scoring standards (Menpan RB No. 14/2017). The highest score was recorded in the Service Implementation element (average score: 3.76), while the lowest Service Suitability received a score of 3.20, indicating a gap between service delivery and public expectations. The overall IKM score of 86.14 places the Secretariat in the “Very Good” performance category and exceeds both its 2022 score and the national average for provincial institutions. Although the findings indicate commendable public service delivery, continuous improvement is essential particularly in aligning service outcomes with community needs and expectations. Strategic recommendations include enhancing user experience audits, refining service communication standards, and expanding digital integration to increase transparency and responsiveness.

Kata Kunci

Evaluation; Satisfaction; Public Service

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi

Adhayanto, O., Sutikno, A., Irman, I., & Nurhasanah, N. (2019). The Archipelago Regional Government Policy Reformulation in Indonesia. ASEAN/Asian Academic Society International Conference Proceeding Series, 481–487. http://aasic.org/proc/aasic/article/view/520

Alam, A. S., & Prawitni, A. (2015). Pengembangan Kapasitas Organisasi dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Dinas Kehutanan dan Perkebunan Kabupaten Bone. Government: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 8(2), 93–104.

Bahasoan, A. (2024). Public Service Transformation: Innovative Strategies of Ambon City Government Towards Openness and Public Satisfaction. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 8(2), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.24198/JMPP.V8I2.52436

Bandura, A. (2015). Cultivate Self-efficacy for Personal and Organizational Effectiveness. In Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2018.03.025

Cascio, W. F. (2017). Managing Human Resources: Productivity, Quality of Work Life, Profits. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Darono, A., & Irawati, D. (2015). Service innovation in the complex environment of tax administration: the Indonesian public sector perspective. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 6(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIRD.2015.067650

Denhardt, J. Vinzant., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service: serving, not steering. Routledge.

Hamirul, H., & Pratiwi, W. (2020). Inovasi dalam Pelayanan Publik. Pena Persada.

Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-9302.2005.00447.X

Helbing, F., Rau, T., & Riedel, A. (2013). Future trends in finance shared services organizations. In Finance Bundling and Finance Transformation: Shared Services Next Level (Vol. 9783658003739, pp. 379–407). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00373-9_19/COVER

Hendriyaldi, H., Erida, E., & Yanti, O. (2022). Transformasi pelayanan publik digital di masa pandemi covid-19 untuk mewujudkan e-government di Lingkungan Pemerintah Daerah Kota Jambi. Jurnal Paradigma Ekonomika, 17(3), 669–682. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/paradigma/article/view/22868

Idrus, I. A., & Ferdian, K. J. (2019). Implementasi Pelayanan Publik Pada Program SIDUKUN 3 In 1 Dalam Pengurusan Administrasi Kependudukan Di DKI Jakarta. Journal of Governance and Local Politics (JGLP), 1(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.47650/JGLP.V1I2.28

Johnston, M. P. (2014). Secondary Data Analysis: A Method of which the Time Has Come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 3(3), 619–626. http://www.qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/169

Kurian, M., & McCarney, P. (2010). Peri-urban water and sanitation services: Policy, planning and method. Peri-Urban Water and Sanitation Services: Policy, Planning and Method, 1–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9425-4

Lindgren, I., Madsen, C. Ø., Hofmann, S., & Melin, U. (2019). Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2019.03.002

Maheshwari, D., Janssen, M., & Veenstra, A. F. Van. (2011). A multi-level framework for measuring and benchmarking public service organizations: Connecting stages-of-growth models and enterprise architecture. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/2072069.2072083

Masdar, S., Asmorowati, S., & Irianto, J. (2009). Manajemen sumber daya manusia berbasis kompetensi untuk pelayanan publik. Airlangga University Press.

Moleong, L. J. (2012). Metodelogi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nugraheni, R., & Kirana, G. R. (2018). The Analysis Quality of Service and Patient Satisfaction Participants of Health BPJS in Interior Services in Hospital X of Kediri City. Journal of Global Research in Public Health, 3(1), 9–17. https://www.jgrph.org/index.php/JGRPH/article/view/120

Olsen, W. (2004). Methodological triangulation and realist research. In Making Realism Work: realist social theory and empirical research (p. 197). Routledge.

Olson, D. J. (2017). Public Port Accountability: A Framework for Evaluation. In Urban Ports and Harbor Management (pp. 307–331). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315169934-14

Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (2019). Public goods and public choices. In Alternatives for Delivering Public Services: Toward Improved Performance. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429047978-2/PUBLIC-GOODS-PUBLIC-CHOICES-VINCENT-OSTROM-ELINOR-OSTROM

Pratiwi, C., Noor, I., & Rozikin, M. (2024). Significance Performance Analysis On The Quality Of University Administrative Services. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 8(2), 433–446. https://doi.org/10.24198/JMPP.V8I2.54062

Priyanto, H. (2024). Public Service Quality in Banyuwangi District: A Study in Welfare Perspective. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 8(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.24198/JMPP.V8I1.48657

Salim, G. M., & Woodward, S. A. (1992). The manager monitor. In Rediscofavering Public Services Management. McGraw-Hill Co.

Sari, N., Noor, I., & Prasetyo, W. Y. (2014). Pengembangan kapasitas kelembagaan pemerintah daerah dalam meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan perizinan terpadu (Studi pada kantor pelayanan dan perizinan terpadu kabupaten kediri). Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP), 2(4), 634–640.

Sianta, J. L., Susena, K. C., & Nengsih, M. K. (2020). The Analysis of Community Satisfaction Index (SMI) On Public Services In Sidomulyo Kelurahan Office Bengkulu City. Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 1(3), 172–181. https://penerbitadm.pubmedia.id/index.php/jurnalemak/article/view/26

Snell, S., & Bohlander, G. (2017). Managing Human Resources.

Sucipta, P. R., & Edison, E. (2022). Alternatif Penerapan Diskresi dalam Model Pelayanan Publik di Daerah yang bercirikan Kepulauan. Journal Presumption of Law, 4(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.31949/JPL.V4I1.2078

Taufiqurokhman, T., & Satispi, E. (2018). Teori dan Perkembangan Manajemen Pelayanan Publik. UMJ Press. http://lib.unsub.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=5103

Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The Point of Triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1547-5069.2001.00253.X

Tomasino, A. P., Fedorowicz, J., & Williams, C. B. (2017). Public sector shared services move out of the back-office: The role of public policy and mission criticality. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 48(3), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130515.3130521

Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2019). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301

Warm, D. (2011). Local government collaboration for a New Decade: Risk, trust, and effectiveness. State and Local Government Review, 43(1), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x11400436

Yoserizal, & Yudiatmaja, W. E. (2010). Strategi Pemerintah Provinsi Sumatera Barat dalam mengembangkan e-government sebagai upaya peningkatan kualitas pelayanan publik. JIANA (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara), 10(1), 89–100.

Yusriadi, Y. (2019). Public Health Services: BPJS Case Study in Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), 9(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.31289/jap.v9i2.2279

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v9i2.55351