Measuring Key Factors in E-Government Participation: A Rasch Modeling Approach with Human Resource Management Considerations

Askolani Askolani; Maya Sari; Budhi Pamungkas Gautama; Yoga Perdana; Dibias Lazuardi Maulid

doi:10.24198/jmpp.v8i2.55816

Measuring Key Factors in E-Government Participation: A Rasch Modeling Approach with Human Resource Management Considerations

Askolani Askolani, Maya Sari, Budhi Pamungkas Gautama, Yoga Perdana, Dibias Lazuardi Maulid

Abstrak

This study examines the subject matter of e-government participation among Indonesian citizens, aiming to assess its effectiveness in enhancing government-citizen relationships through social media and good governance practices. The objectives include constructing and validating a survey instrument based on 15 experience items related to e-government perception, utilizing Rasch modeling to analyze data from 101 respondents. Results indicate strong reliability (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.94) and significant correlations (Person raw score-to-measure correlation = 0.99), affirming the instrument's capability to measure variables influencing e-government participation effectively. The findings align well with Rasch model expectations (Infit and Outfit MNSQ within acceptable ranges), highlighting the instrument's suitability for comprehensive assessment. In conclusion, this research contributes insights into enhancing government transparency, accountability, and responsiveness, crucial for fostering trust and effective governance in the digital era.

Kata Kunci

Public Administration; Governance; Transparency; Accountability; Citizen Engagement; Human Resource Management

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi

Abdulkareem, A. K., & Mohd Ramli, R. (2022). Does trust in e-government influence the performance of e-government? An integration of information system success model and public value theory. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 16(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2021-0001

Agarwal, P. K. (2018). Public Administration Challenges in the World of AI and Bots. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 917–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12979

Alhanatleh, H., Aboalganam, K., & Awad, H. (2022). Electronic government public value of public institutions in Jordan. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.5267/J.IJDNS.2021.10.007

AlMulhim, A. F. (2023). The impact of administrative management and information technology on e-government success: The mediating role of knowledge management practices. Cogent Business and Management, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2202030

Almuraqab, N. A. S., Jasimuddin, S. M., & Mansoor, W. (2021). An Empirical Study of the Perception of the End-User on the Acceptance of Smart Government Service in the UAE. Journal of Global Information Management, 29(6), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.20211101.oa11

Defitri, S. Y. (2022). The role of political will in enhancing e-government: An empirical case in Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(1).2022.07

Garcia-Rio, E., Palos-Sanchez, P. R., Baena-Luna, P., & Aguayo-Camacho, M. (2023). Different approaches to analyzing e-government adoption during the Covid-19 pandemic. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), 101866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101866

Grimsley, M., & Meehan, A. (2007). e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000674

Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130

Hariguna, T., Rahardja, U., & Sarmini, U. (2022). The Role of E-Government Ambidexterity as the Impact of Current Technology and Public Value: An Empirical Study. Informatics, 9(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9030067

Hermanto, B., & Miftahuddin, A. (2021). Tourism experience in Indonesia: A new approach using the rasch model scale. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 38(4), 1051–1056. https://doi.org/10.30892/GTG.38409-743

Hujran, O., Al-Debei, M. M., Al-Adwan, A. S., Alarabiat, A., & Altarawneh, N. (2023). Examining the antecedents and outcomes of smart government usage: An integrated model. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101783

Hutahaean, M., Eunike, I. J., & Silalahi, A. D. K. (2023). Do Social Media, Good Governance, and Public Trust Increase Citizens’ e-Government Participation? Dual Approach of PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9988602

Iglesias-Antelo, S., López-López, V., & Vázquez-Sanmartín, A. (2021). Assessing the influence of strategic resources on the quality of life in spanish cities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313048

Karunia, R. L., Budiaji, R., Suzana, R., Dewi, K. S., & Prasetyo, J. H. (2023). Analysis of the Factors that Affect the Implementation of E-Government in Indonesia. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(3), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i3.1216

Koniyo, M. H., Giriantari, I. A. D., Sudarma, M., & Wirastuti, N. M. A. E. D. (2023). Electronic government system measurement model: a systematic testing of e-government implementation. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 32(2), 845–856. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v32.i2.pp845-856

Kurniawan, C., Pribadi, U., & Iqbal, M. (2023). the Role of E-Governance in Improving Local Governments Performance (Case Study: Sumbawa Regency). Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 11(3), 1139–1154. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v11i3.795

Lee, K. L., Amin, A. J., Alzoubi, H. M., Alshurideh, M., Khatib, M. El, Joghee, S., & Nair, K. (2024). Investigating the factors affecting e-procurement adoption in supply chain performance: An empirical study on Malaysia manufacturing industry. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(2), 615–632. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2024.1.021

Miftahuddin, A., Hermanto, B., Raharja, S. J., & Chan, A. (2020). City brand attractiveness on tourism using rasch model approach. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(2), 150–156. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85085379587&partnerID=40&md5=6559f1383021d7fe2fd21f5f1afaaa79

Nam, T. (2014). Determining the type of e-government use. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.09.006

Nguyen, H. N., & Tran, M. D. (2022). Stimuli To Adopt E-Government Services During Covid-19: Evidence From Vietnam. Innovative Marketing, 18(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.18(1).2022.02

Putra, R., Sobri, K. M., Azhar, & Santoso, A. D. (2022). Antecedents of e-government perceived net benefits: a study of e-filing in Indonesia. Telkomnika (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control), 20(5), 1016–1025. https://doi.org/10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.v20i5.22560

Rachmawati, Aswar, K., Sumardjo, M., Wiguna, M., & Hariyani, E. (2022). Personal and reliability factors affecting adoption and utilization of e-government: An effect of intention to use. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(2), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(2).2022.23

Riyanto, & Azis, A. (2021). Application of the Vector Machine Support Method in Twitter Social Media Sentiment Analysis Regarding the COVID-19 Vaccine Issue in Indonesia. Journal of Applied Data Sciences, 2(3), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v2i3.40

Saleh, A. A., & Alyaseen, I. F. T. (2021). Successful factors determine the significant relationship between e-governance system and government operational excellence. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 10(6), 3460–3470. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v10i6.2447

Trkman, M., Popovič, A., & Trkman, P. (2023). The roles of privacy concerns and trust in voluntary use of governmental proximity tracing applications. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101787

Wagenaar, H., & Cook, S. D. N. (2003). Understanding policy practices: action, dialectic and deliberation in policy analysis. In M. A. Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society (pp. 139–171). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511490934.007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v8i2.55816