Properti Psikometri Indonesia Desirable Responding Scale
Abstrak
Kepatutan sosial (social desirability) merupakan bias respons yang dapat mengancam validitas pengukuran self-report. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi properti psikometris dari Indonesia Desirable Responding Scale (IDRES), sebuah instrumen baru yang didasarkan pada model dua faktor Paulhus: self-deceptive enhancement (SDE) dan impression management (IM). Partisipan penelitian ini berjumlah 508 orang (M usia = 23 tahun; SD = 4.93) yang terlibat dalam asesmen daring berisiko rendah (low stake) maupun tinggi (high stake). Evaluasi psikometri dilakukan menggunakan pendekatan classical test theory (CTT), dan item response theory (IRT) melalui model Rasch untuk memperoleh bukti reliabilitas instrumen dan validitasnya. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa, berdasarkan pendekatan CTT, kedua dimensi memiliki reliabilitas yang memuaskan untuk SDE (α = .857; ω = .858) dan IM (α = .774; ω =.717). Namun demikian, analisis Rasch mengungkap bahwa dimensi IM memiliki reliabilitas person yang rendah (.552) dengan tingkat endorsement butir soal yang cenderung tinggi. Selanjutnya, pembuktian validitas internal dengan confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) menunjukkan bahwa model dua faktor memiliki kecocokan model (fit) yang jauh lebih baik (X2= 332, CFI = .973; TLI = 969; RMSEA = .044; SRMR = .069) dibandingkan model unidimensional (X² = 633; df =170; p < .05; CFI = .922; TLI = 913; RMSEA = .073; SRMR = .102). Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa meskipun IDRES adalah alat ukur yang reliabel dan terbukti secara struktural valid, dimensi IM memerlukan perbaikan lebih lanjut dengan penggunaan norma terpisah berdasarkan gender serta penyesuaian tingkat kesulitan butir soal untuk meminimalkan bias gender pengukuran kepatutan sosial.
Kata Kunci
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Aspinall, Edward & Fossati, Diego & Muhtadi, Burhanuddin & Warburton, Eve. (2019). Elites, masses, and democratic decline in Indonesia. Democratization. 27. 1-22. 10.1080/13510347.2019.1680971.
Ballard, R., Crino, M. D., & Rubenfeld, S. (1988). Social desirability response bias and the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Psychological Reports, 63(1), 227–237.
Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2), 186–203.
Beretvas, S. N., Meyers, J. L., & Leite, W. L. (2002). A reliability generalization study of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(4), 570–589.
Berry, C. M., Page, R. C., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Effects of self‐deceptive enhancement on personality–job performance relationships. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(1), 94–109.
Bing, M. N., Kluemper, D., Davison, H. K., Taylor, S., & Novicevic, M. (2011). Overclaiming as a measure of faking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(1), 148–162.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2013). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Psychology Press.
Camilli, G., & Shepard, L. A. (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items (Vol. 4). Sage.
Caputo, A. (2020). The role of self-deceptive enhancement and impression management in adolescents’ self-reported attitudes toward drinking, willingness to drink and risky alcohol consumption. Journal of Substance Use, 26(3), 268–274.
Carels, R. A., Cacciapaglia, H. M., Rydin, S., Douglass, O. M., & Harper, J. (2006). Can social desirability interfere with success in a behavioral weight loss program? Psychology and Health, 21(1), 65–78.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349.
Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement, Prentice-Hall. Inc. Https://Doi. Org/10.1016/0022-4405 (73), 90055–90057.
Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research.
Gignac, G. E. (2013). Modeling the balanced inventory of desirable responding: Evidence in favor of a revised model of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(6), 645–656.
Guadagno, R. E., & Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Gender differences in impression management in organizations: A qualitative review. Sex Roles, 56, 483–494.
Hart, C. M., Ritchie, T. D., Hepper, E. G., & Gebauer, J. E. (2015). The balanced inventory of desirable responding short form (BIDR-16). Sage Open, 5(4), 2158244015621113.
Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (1985). An alternate definition of the ETS delta scale of item difficulty. ETS Research Report Series, 1985(2), i–10.
Holtgraves, T. (2004). Social desirability and self-reports: Testing models of socially desirable responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(2), 161–172.
Kalkbrenner, Michael. (2021). Alpha, Omega, and H Internal Consistency Reliability Estimates: Reviewing These Options and When to Use Them. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation. 14. 1-12. 10.1080/21501378.2021.1940118.
Klesges, L. M., Baranowski, T., Beech, B., Cullen, K., Murray, D. M., Rochon, J., & Pratt, C. (2004). Social desirability bias in self-reported dietary, physical activity and weight concerns measures in 8- to 10-year-old African-American girls: results from the Girls Health Enrichment Multisite Studies (GEMS). Preventive medicine, 38 Suppl, S78–S87.
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
Lanyon, R. I., & Carle, A. C. (2007). Internal and external validity of scores on the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding and the Paulhus Deception Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(5), 859–876.
LeComte, C. L., & Bernardi, R. A. (2008). Impressions of Questionable Marketing Practices in Indonesia: The Influence of Gender and Social Desirability Response Bias. Electric Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies.
Li, C.-H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 936–949.
Locander, W., Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. (1976). An investigation of interview method, threat and response distortion. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(354), 269–275.
Mensch, B. S., & Kandel, D. B. (1988). Underreporting of substance use in a national longitudinal youth cohort: Individual and interviewer effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52(1), 100–124.
Muthén, B. O. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Psychometrika.
Nurumov, K., Hernández-Torrano, D., Ait Si Mhamed, A., & Ospanova, U. (2022). Measuring Social Desirability in Collectivist Countries: A Psychometric Study in a Representative Sample From Kazakhstan. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 822931. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.822931
Oktapialdi, R., Tarigan, M., & Musthofa, M. A. (2018). PENGEMBANGAN SKALA SOCIAL DESIRABILITY. Jurnal Psikologi Insight, 2(1), 33-42.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 598.
Raju, N. S. (1988). The area between two item characteristic curves. Psychometrika, 53(4), 495–502.
Rosse, J. G., Stecher, M. D., Miller, J. L., & Levin, R. A. (1998). The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 634.
Salgado, Jesus. (2005). Personality and social desirability in organizational settings: Practical implications for work and organizational psychology. Papeles Del Psicólogo. 26.
Schumacker, R. E., & Smith Jr, E. V. (2007). A Rasch perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(3), 394–409.
Setiawati, F. A., Widyastuti, T., Fathiyah, K. N., & Nabila, T. S. (2024). Minimizing Social Desirability in Questionnaires of Non-Cognitive Measurements. European Journal of Psychology and Educational Research, 7(1), 33–43.
Silver, B. D., Anderson, B. A., & Abramson, P. R. (1986). Who overreports voting? American Political Science Review, 80(2), 613–624.
Tully, R. J., & Bailey, T. (2017). Validation of the Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS) in the UK and examination of the links between PDS and personality. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 3(1), 38–50.
Uziel, L. (2014). Impression management (“lie”) scales are associated with interpersonally oriented self‐control, not other‐deception. Journal of Personality, 82(3), 200–212.
Widhiarso W. (2012). Evaluasi Properti Psikometris Skala Kepatutan Sosial Adaptasi dari Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Jurnal Insan. 13 (3). 138-148.
Widyastuti, T., Setiawati, F. A., Darojat, A. A., & Utomo, R. C. (2024). Selecting Number of Factors of The Indonesian version of The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding Short Form (BIDR-16): Is it Two or Four-Factor?
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jpsp.v9i3.68135
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-sa4.footer##
Jurnal ini terideks di:
