The correlation between the severity of anterior crossbite and skeletal deformities in post-surgery cleft lip and palate among children
Abstract
Introduction: Cleft lip and palate is the most common craniofacial malformations, which is a congenital deformity of lip and palate or both. Anterior crossbite is occlusal characteristics that are often found in patients with cleft lip and palate who had surgery, caused by dentoalveolar or skeletal abnormalities, can be distinguished based on the cephalometric analysis. This research was aimed to analyse the correlation between the severity of anterior crossbite and skeletal deformities in post-surgery cleft lip and palate among children. Methods: The research design was an analytic correlation with the sample selection based on purposive sampling. The research was conducted from 14 cleft lip and palate patients in the primary dentition (aged 4-6 years old) who had surgery (for 2-3 years) using analysis of study models and cephalometric digital. Statistical analysis was conducted by Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient test to analyse the relationship between the severity of anterior crossbite with skeletal deformities. Results: Statistic test showed that 42.86% of the anterior crossbite in the cleft lip and palate post-surgery in primary dentition had a very high level of severity, thus leading to very poor occlusion. As many as 21.43% had a high level of severity, which leads to poor occlusion, and 35.71% had a moderate level of severity, which leads to fair occlusion. The Spearman Coefficient of Rank Correlation test results showed a weak correlation between the severity of anterior crossbite with skeletal deformities with coefficient relation of 0.13 and p-value of 0.48 (p<0.05). Conclusion: There is a weak correlation between the severity of anterior crossbite with skeletal deformities in post-surgery cleft lip and palate among children.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
de Souza Freitas JA, Garib DG, Oliviera TM, Lauris RDCMC, de Almeida ALPF, Neves LT, et al. Rehabilitative treatment of cleft lip and palate: Experience of the Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies – USP (HRAC-USP) – Part 2: Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012; 20(2): 268-81. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572012000200024
Tai K, Park JH, Tanino M, Sato Y. Orthodontic treatment of a bilateral cleft lip and palate patient with bilateral tooth transpositions and congenitally missing teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010; 35(2): 225-31. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.35.2.q2t5735873357p47
Yilmaz HN, Ozbilen EO, Ustun T. The prevalence of cleft lip and palate patients: A single-center experience for 17 years. Turk J Orthod. 2019; 32(3): 139-44. DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18094
Apriani A, Saptarini R, Kasim A, Oscandar F. Assessment of nasopharynx area and level of severity posterior crossbite on children with cleft lips and palate postpalatoplasty. Padjadjaran J Dent. 2020; 32(2): 142-8. DOI: 10.24198/pjd.vol32no2.17951
Murthy J, Bhaskar LVKS. Current concepts in genetics of nonsyndromic clefts. Indian J Plast Surg. 2009; 42(1): 68–81. DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.53004
Jagomagi T, Soots M, Saag M. Epidemiologic factors causing cleft lip and palate and their regularities of occurrence in Estonia. 2010; 12: 105-8.
Reiser E, Skoog V, Gerdin B, Sobocki AA. Association between cleft size and crossbite in children with cleft palate and unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofacial J. 2010; 47(2): 175-81. DOI: 10.1597/08-219_1
Wangsrimongkol T, Jansawang W. The assessment of treatment outcome by evaluation of dental arch relationship on cleft lip/palate. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010; 93 (Suppl 4): S100-6.
Bardach J, Roberts DM, Yale R, Rosewall D, Mooney M. The influence of simultaneous cleft lip and palate repair on facial growth in rabbits. Cleft Palate J. 1980; 17(4): 309-18.
Reiser E. Cleft Size and Maxillary Arch Dimensions in Unilateral Cleft lip and Palate and Cleft Palate [dissertation]. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet; 2011.
Zakariassen A, Notkevich M, Vevik I, Mandal IS. Treatment outcome in patients with anterior crossbites in the student clinic in Tromso. [research report]. Tromso: Universitetet I Tromsø; 2012.
Chalmers EV. Intra-oral Three Dimensional Scanning for Assessment of Surgical Outcome in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate [dissertation]. Dundee: 2015
Tothill C, Mossey PA. Assessment of arch constriction in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate and isolated cleft palate: A pilot study. Eur J Orthod. 2007; 29(2): 193-7. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjm006
Yen SLK. Protocols for late maxillary protraction in cleft lip and palate patients at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles. Semin Orthod. 2011; 17(2): 138–48. DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2011.01.001
Pereira RMR, De Melo EMC, Coutinho SB, Do Vale DM, Siqueira N, Alonso N. Evaluation of craniofacial growth in patient with cleft lip and palate undergoing one-stage palate repair. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2011; 26(4): 624-30. DOI: 10.1590/S1983-51752011000400015
Choi HJ, Kim JY, Yoo SE, Kwon JH, Park K. Cephalometric characteristics of Korean children with class III malocclusion in the deciduous dentition. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80(1): 86-90. DOI: 10.2319/120108-605.1
Shi B, Losee JE. The impact of cleft lip and palate repair on maxillofacial growth. Int J Oral Sci. 2015; 7(1): 14–7. DOI: 10.1038/ijos.2014.59
Agrawal D. Cephalometric analysis for diagnosis and treatment of orthodontic patients. J Oral Health Comm Dent. 2013; 7(2): 75-79. DOI: 10.5005/johcd-7-2-75
Joubish MF, Khurram MA. Cognitive development in Jean Piaget's work and its implications for teachers. World Appl Sci J. 2011; 12(8): 1260-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjd.vol32no3.17952
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Visitor Stat
Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License