Perbedaan dimensi saluran udara faring pada berbagai relasi skeletal   Differences of dimension of the pharyngeal airway in various skeletal relations

Mimi Marina Lubis; Sonia Jayanthi

doi:10.24198/pjdrs.v3i2.23666

Perbedaan dimensi saluran udara faring pada berbagai relasi skeletal
Differences of dimension of the pharyngeal airway in various skeletal relations

Mimi Marina Lubis, Sonia Jayanthi

Abstract

Pendahuluan: Faring merupakan otot yang berfungsi sebagai saluran masuk dan keluarnya makanan dan udara. Penilaian terhadap saluran udara faring berhubungan dengan penilaian terhadap fungsi pernafasan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa adanya perbedaan dimensi saluran udara faring antara berbagai relasi sagital skeletal pada laki-laki dan perempuan. Metode: Sefalogram lateral dari 100 subjek di bagi menjadi tiga kelompok (masing-masing kelompok terdiri dari 40 subjek Kelas I, 34 subjek Kelas II, 26 subjek Kelas III) berdasarkan sudut ANB: Kelas I (ANB 0-4), Kelas II (ANB >4°), Kelas III (ANB <0°). Seluruh sefalogram lateral dilakukan tracing dan pengukuran secara manual. Pengukuran dilakukan terhadap lebar nasofaring (PNS-UPW), lebar orofaring (U-MPW), lebar laringofaring (V-LPW). Hasil: Analisa statistik menunjukkan adanya perbedaan yang signifikan pada lebar orofaring (U-MPW) di antara relasi sagital skeletal yang berbeda (p<0,05). Perbedaan pada jenis kelamin ditemukan pada lebar laringofaring (V-LPW) (p<0,05). Simpulan: Terdapat perbedaan dimensi saluran udara faring di antara relasi skeletal dan jenis kelamin yang berbeda.

Kata kunci: Dimensi saluran udara faring, sefalometri lateral, relasi sagital skeletal.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Pharynx is a muscle that functions as an inlet and outlet for food and air. The evaluation of the pharyngeal airway is related to the evaluation of respiratory function. The purpose of this study was to analyse the differences of dimension of the pharyngeal airway in various skeletal relations in men and women. Methods: Lateral cephalograms of 100 subjects divided into three groups (each group consisted of 40 Class I subject, 34 Class II subjects, and 26 Class III subjects) based on the ANB angles: Class I (ANB 0-4), Class II ( ANB >4 °), Class III (ANB <0 °). All lateral cephalograms were manually traced and measured. Measurements were made of nasopharyngeal width (PNS-UPW), oropharyngeal width (U-MPW), and laryngopharyngeal width (V-LPW). Results: Statistical analysis showed a significant difference in the width of the oropharynx (U-MPW) between different skeletal sagittal relations (p < 0.05). Sex differences were found in laryngopharyngeal width (V-LPW) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: There are differences in the dimension of the pharyngeal airway between different skeletal and gender relations.

Keywords: Dimension of the pharyngeal airway, lateral cephalometry, sagittal skeletal relations.

Keywords

Kata kunci: Dimensi saluran udara faring, sefalometri lateral, relasi sagital skeletal. Keywords: Dimension of the pharyngeal airway, lateral cephalometry, sagittal skeletal relations.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Memon S, Fida M, Shaikh A.. Comparison of different craniofacial patterns with pharyngeal widths. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2012; 22(5): 302-6.

Jayan B, Kadu A. Airway-focused orthodontics. J Indian Orthod Soc 2018; 52: S23-8.

Anandarajah S, Dudhia R, Sandram A, Sonnesen L. Risk Factors for Small Pharyngeal Airway dimensions in Preorthodontic Children: A Three-Dimensional Study. Angle Orthod 2017; 87(1): 138-46.

Woo GH. A retrospective lateral cephalometric growth study of sagittal airway changes [thesis]. Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Disertations & Projects; 2017. 359. Available from: http://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/359

Nanda M, Singla A, Negi A, Jaj HS, Mahajan V. The association between maksilomandibular sagittal relationship and pharyngeal airway passage dimensions. J Ind Orthod Soc 2012; 46(1): 48-52.

Katherine C, Burdett E. Anatomy of the nose and pharynx. JCAIM 2011; 17(7): 283-6.

Gore MR, Levine MS. Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology. 4th ed. London: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2015.p.207-9.

Singh V. Textbook of anatomy head, neck and brain. Vol 3. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Reed Elsevier India Private Limited, 2014:199-202.

Kaur S, Rai S, Sinha, Rajan V, Mishra D, Panjwani S. A lateral cephalogram study for evaluation of pharyngeal airway space and its relation to neck circumference and body mass index to determine predictors of obstructive sleep apnea. 2015; 27(1): 2-8.

Praktik, Arora A, Sachan A, Parihar A, Singh A, Bhradwaj R. Cephalometric Evaluation of Pharyngeal Airway Dimension in Different Maxillomandibular Sagittal relationship-A Cephalometric Study. IJSR 2016; 5(3): 672-5.

Chiang CC, Jeffres MN, Miller A, Hatcher DC. Three-dimensional airway evaluation in 387 subjects from one university orthodontic clinic using cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2012; 82(6): 985-92.

Eslamian L, Badice MR, Yousefinia S, Kharazifard MJ. Radiographic assessment of upper airway size in skeletal sagittal and vertical jaw discrepancies. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran 2014; 26(2): 96-101.

Gu M, McGrath CPJ, Hägg U, Wong RWK, Yang Y. Anatomy of the upper airway and its growth in childhood. J Dent Oral Biol 2016; 1(1): 1005

Kim YJ, Hong JS, Hwang YI, Park YH. Three-dimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway in preadolescent children with different anteroposterior skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137: 306e1-11.

Claudino LV, Mattos CT, Ruellas ACO, Anna EFS. Pharyngeal airway characterization on adolescents related to facial skeletal pattern: a preliminary study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 143(6) : 799-809.

Lopatienė K, Dabkutė A, Juškevičiūtė V; Vertical and sagittal morphology of the facial skeleton and the pharyngeal airway. Stomatologija, Baltic Dent and Max J 2016; 18(1): 21-5.

Zhong Z, Tang Z, Gao X, Zeng XL. A comparison study of upper airway among different skeletal craniofacial patterns in nonsnoring chinese children. Angle Orthod 2010; 80(2): 267-74.

Daraze A, Delatte M, Liistro G, Majzoub Z. Cephalometric of pharyngeal airway space in lebanese adults. Int J Dent 2017; 1-6.

Gonҫalves EC, Raveli DB, Pinto AS. Effects of age and gender on upper airway, lower airway and upper lip growth. Braz Oral Res 2011; 25(3): 241-7.

Takemoto Y, Saitoh I. Pharyngeal airway in children with prognathism and normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 2011;81(1): 75-80.

Guttal KS, Burde KN. Cephalometric evaluations of upper airway in healthy adult population: a preliminary study. J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2013; 1(2): 55-60.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjdrs.v3i2.23666