Perbedaan teknik pencetakan two step dengan spacer coping metal dan polyethylene sheet terhadap cacat permukaan dan akurasi dimensi model kerja gigi tiruan cekat  Difference between two step printing techniques with spacer coping metal and polyethylene sheet to surface defects and dimensional accuracy of fixed denture working models

Dicky Guntara; Putri Welda Utami Ritonga

doi:10.24198/pjdrs.v3i2.23798

Perbedaan teknik pencetakan two step dengan spacer coping metal dan polyethylene sheet terhadap cacat permukaan dan akurasi dimensi model kerja gigi tiruan cekat
Difference between two step printing techniques with spacer coping metal and polyethylene sheet to surface defects and dimensional accuracy of fixed denture working models

Dicky Guntara, Putri Welda Utami Ritonga

Abstract

Pendahuluan: Pencetakan merupakan hasil dari cetakan gigi dan struktur jaringan pendukung. Untuk mendapatkan hasil cetakan yang baik, maka diperlukan teknik cetakan yang mampu menghasilkan permukaan cetakan yang halus dan akurasi dimensi yang tepat sehingga meningkatkan keberhasilan pembuatan gigi tiruan cekat. Salah satu teknik pencetakan untuk mendapatkan hasil cetakan yang baik adalah teknik two step dengan spacer. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui cacat permukaan dan perbedaan nilai akurasi dimensi model kerja gigi tiruan cekat pada pencetakan two–step dengan spacer coping metal 1 mm, coping metal 2 mm, dan polyethylene sheet 0,5 mm. Metode: Sampel pada penelitian ini diperoleh dari pencetakan model induk berdasarkan spesifikasi ANSI/ADA No.19. Sampel tersebut diperlukan untuk melihat cacat permukaan dan perhitungan akurasi. Jumlah sampel yang akan digunakan untuk diberi perlakuan sebanyak 8 sampel setiap kelompok yaitu putty/wash two step unspacer (kelompok A), putty/wash two step spacer coping metal 1 mm (kelompok B), putty/wash two step spacer coping metal 2 mm (kelompok C), putty/wash two step spacer polyethylene sheet 0,5 mm (kelompok D). Hasil: Tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan pada cacat permukaan cetakan dan ada perbedaan yang signifikan pada akurasi dimensi model kerja gigi tiruan cekat pada hasil pencetakan two step dengan spacer coping metal 1 mm, coping metal 2 mm, dan polyethylene sheet 0,5 mm. Simpulan: Bila dilihat dari cacat permukaan maka hasil pencetakan two step dengan spacer polyethylene sheet 0,5 mm yang paling baik digunakan. Bila dilihat dari akurasi dimensi maka pencetakan two step dengan spacer coping metal 2 mm yang paling baik digunakan.

Kata kunci: Pencetakan, two – step, spacer, cacat, akurasi.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Imprint is the result of teeth and supporting tissue structures cast. To get a good impression, we need an imprint technique that can produce a smooth imprint surface and precise dimensional accuracy to increase the success of fixed denture manufacturing. One of the imprint technique to get a good impression is the two-step technique with a spacer. The purpose of this study was to determine surface defects and differences in dimensional accuracy value of fixed denture working models fabricated with two-step impression with 1 mm metal coping spacer, 2 mm metal coping sheet, and 0.5 mm polyethylene sheet. Methods: The sample in this study was obtained from the master model cast based on ANSI / ADA No.19 specifications. These samples were needed for surface defects observation and accuracy calculation. The number of samples that will be used for treatment was 8 samples per group, namely putty / wash two-step unspacer (group A), putty / wash two-step 1 mm metal coping spacer (group B), putty / wash two-step 2 mm metal coping spacer (group C), putty / wash two-step 0.5 mm polyethylene sheet spacer (group D). Results: There was no significant difference in the surface defects, and there were significant differences in dimensional accuracy of fixed denture working models fabricated with two-step imprint technique with 1 mm metal coping spacer, 2 mm metal coping spacer, and 0.5 mm polyethylene sheet. Conclusion: Assessed from the surface defects, two-step imprint technique with 0.5 mm polyethylene sheet is the best imprint technique. While from dimensional accuracy, two-step imprint technique with 2 mm metal coping spacer is the best imprint technique.

Keywords: Imprint, two-step, spacer, defect, accuracy.

Keywords

Kata kunci: Pencetakan, two – step, spacer, cacat, akurasi. Keywords: Imprint, two-step, spacer, defect, accuracy.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Varvara G, Murura G, Sinjari B, Cardelli P, Caputi S. Evaluation of defects in surface detail for monophase, 2 – phase, and 3 – phase impression technique: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 113: 108 – 12.

Dugal R, Railkar B, Musani S. Commparative evaluation of dimensional accuracy of different polyvinyl siloxane putty – wash impression technique – in vitro study. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5(5): 85 – 6, 91 – 3.

Pandey A, Mehtra A. Comparative study of dimensional stability and accuracy of various elastomeric materials. Jornal of Dental and Medical Sciences 2014; 13: 40, 43.

M. Kanmani, C. Sabarigirinathan, K. Vinayagavel, V. Harisnath, P. Rupkumar, Bipinchandra LN, et al. The influence of putty wash impression technique on dimensional accuracy of twi commercially available vinyl poly siloxane impression materials: An invitro study. Int J Dent Health Sci 2015; 2(3): 473 – 4, 478 – 9.

Jamshidy L, Mozaffari HR, Faraji P, Sharifi R. Accuracy of the one – stage and two – stage impression technique: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Dentistry 2016; 2016: 1 – 4.

Singh K, Sahoo S, KD Prasad, Goel M, Singh A. Effect of different impression technique on the dimensional accuracy of impressions using various elastomeric impression materials: An in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012; 13(1): 98.

Goel M, Dhawan P, Tandan P, Madhukar P. Need for a reliable alternative to custom – made implant impression tray: an in vitro study comparing accuracy of custom tray vesus specialized aluminum stock tray. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2018; 18: 271 – 6.

Levartovsky S, Levy G, Brosh T, Harel N, Ganor Y, Pilo R. Dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane impression material reproducing the sulcular area. Dent Mater J 2013; 32(1): 25 – 6, 29 – 31.

Shiozawa M, Takahashi H, Finger WJ, Iwasaki N. Effects of the space for wash materials on sulcus depth reproduction with addition – curing silicone using two – step putty – wash technique. Dent Mater J 2013; 32(1): 150.

Franco EB, Leonardo FdC, Herrera FS, Benetti AR. Accuracy of single – step versus 2 – step double mix – impression technique. ISRN Dentistry 2011; 2011: 1 – 4.

Saifudin ASAZ, Kamaruddin F, Ghani SMA. The quality of working impressions for the fabrication of fixed prosthodontics prostheses ( crown and bridge ). European Journal of Generl Dentistry 2014; 3 (2): 00 – 01.

Vitti RP, Sobrinho LC, Sinhoreti MAC. Dimensional accuracy of stone cast made by a monophase impression technique using different elastomeric impression materials.

Braz J Oral Sci 2011; 10 (3): 175 – 9.

Kumari N, Nandeeshwar DB. The dimensional accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using two different impression technique: an in vitro study. J indian Prosthodont Soc 2015; 15: 211 – 7.

Kenneth AJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 12 th ed., Riverport lane: Elsevier Saunders. 2013: 160.

Varvara G, Murmura G, Sinjari B, Cardeli P, Caputi S. Evaluation of defects in survace detail for monophase, 2 – phase, and 3 – phase impression technique: An invitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2014: 1 – 4.

Fauzia N. Pengaruh pencetakan putty/wash one – step dan two – step terhadap cacat permukaan cetakan dan akurasi dimensi model kerja gigi tiruan cekat. Skripsi. USU. Medan. 2017.

Shrestha P, Poudel S, Shrestha K. A clinical comparison of polyvinyl siloxane impressions for fixed partial dentures using three different techniques. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research. 2015; 3(2): 6.

Heidari B, Fallahi S, Izadi A, dkk. Experimental investigation of effect of light – body material space on the accuracy of cast resulting of two – step impression technique in two types of addition silicone. IJBPAS 2016; 5(9): 3320 – 330.

Nissan J, Rosner O, Bukhari MA, Ghelfan O, Pilo R. Effect of various putty – wash impression techniques on marginal fit of cast crowns. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013; 33: e37 – e41.

Chugh A, Arora A, Singh VP. Accuracy of different putty – wash impression techniques with various spacer thickness. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2012; 5(1): 33 – 7.

Levartovsky S, Levy G, Brosh T, Harel N, Ganor Y, Pilo R. Dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane impression material reproducing the sulcular area. Dent Mater J 2013; 32(1): 25 – 6, 29 – 31.

McCabe JF, Walls AWG. Bahan kedokteran gigi. Ahli Bahasa. Sunarintyas S, Mustaqimah ND. Jakarta: EGC, 2014: 194, 196 – 7, 229 – 32, 234 – 42.

Fernando. Perbedaan akurasi dimensi hasil pencetakan teknik putty – wash satu tahap dan dua tahap dalam pembuatan gigi tiruan cekat. Tesis. Medan: Program Pendidikan Dokter Gigi Spesialis Prostodonsia Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Sumatera Utara. 2017: 26 – 27.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjdrs.v3i2.23798