Perbedaan antara perlekatan Candida albicans pada glass fiber non dental dan e-glass fiber dental reinforced polymer setelah perendaman dalam NaOCl 0,5%
The difference between the adhesion of Candida albicans on glass fiber non-dental and e-glass fiber dental reinforced polymer after immersion in 0.5% NaOCl
Abstract
Pendahuluan: Porositas merupakan salah satu sifat fisik yang dapat membuat resin akrilik rentan terhadap perlekatan debris dan mikroorganisme seperti Candida albicans. Permasalahan tersebut dapat diatasi dengan penambahan fiber. Resin akrilik yang ditambahkan fiber mempunyai sifat fisis yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan resin tanpa penambahan fiber. E-glass fiber sering digunakan dalam bidang kedokteran gigi, namun di Indonesia harganya relatif mahal dan sulit diperoleh sehingga perlu pemesanan yang cukup lama. Alternatif seperti Glass fiber non dental banyak tersedia dengan harga yang terjangkau. Tujuan penelitian adalah menganalisis perbedaan perlekatan Candida albicans pada fiber reinforced polymer antara glass fiber non dental dan e-glass fiber dental setelah perendaman NaOCl 0,5%. Metode: Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kuantitatif dengan metode eksperimental laboratorium menggunakan rancangan posttest control group design. Jumlah total sampel adalah 12 buah, dibagi menjadi 3 kelompok yaitu kelompok kontrol (polymer tanpa penambahan fiber), kelompok perlakuan 1 (glass fiber non dental reinforced polymer), dan kelompok perlakuan 2 (e-glass fiber dental reinforced polymer). Analisis statistik menggunakan uji Kruskal-Wallis, selanjutnya untuk mengetahui kelompok mana yang terdapat perbedaan maka selanjutnya dilakukan uji lanjutan (post-hoc) menggunakan uji Mann-Whitney untuk mengetahui adanya perbedaan pada tiap kelompok. Hasil: Perlekatan Candida albicans pada kelompok kontrol (0,68%), glass fiber non dental (0,56%), dan e-glass fiber dental (0,43%). Hasil uji statistik nilai p= 0,007<0,05. Hasil uji Post hoc 0,021. Simpulan: Terdapat perbedaan perlekatan Candida albicans antara glass fiber non dental dan e-glass fiber dental reinforced polymer setelah perendaman dalam larutan sodium hipoklorit (NaOCl) 0,5 %.
Kata kunci: Candida albicans, glass fiber non dental, e-glass fiber dental reinforced polymer, natrium hipoklorit 0,5%.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Porosity is one of the mechanical properties that makes acrylic resin susceptible to the attachment of debris and microorganisms such as Candida albicans. The addition of fiber can overcome this problem. The addition of fiber will leads to acrylic resin with better physical properties than without the addition. E-glass fiber is often used in dentistry. However, in Indonesia, the price is relatively high and difficult to obtain, requiring quite a long order. Alternatives such as non-dental glass fiber are widely available at affordable prices. This study was aimed to analyse the difference in the adhesion of Candida albicans on glass fiber non-dental and e-glass fiber dental reinforced polymer after immersion in 0.5% NaOCl. Methods: The type of research was quantitative research with experimental laboratory methods using a posttest control group design. The total number of samples was 12, divided into three groups: the control group (polymer without fiber addition), treatment group 1 (glass fiber non-dental reinforced polymer), and treatment group 2 (e-glass fiber dental reinforced polymer). Statistical analysis used was the Kruskal-Wallis test. Then, to determine which groups had differences, an advance test (post-hoc) was carried out using the Mann-Whitney test to determine the differences in each group. Results: Adhesion of Candida albicans in the control group (0.68%), non-dental glass fiber (0.56%), and dental e-glass fiber (0.43%). The result of the statistical test resulted in p-value=0.007; p<0.05. The result of the post-hoc test was 0.021. Conclusion: There is a difference in the adhesion of Candida albicans between non-dental glass fiber and dental e-glass fiber dental re-inforced polymer after immersion in 0.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution.
Keywords: Candida albicans, glass fiber non dental, e-glass fiber dental reinforced polymer, 0.5% sodium hypochlorite.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Fang HP, En LJ, Meei TI, Ahmed R, Aziz AFA. Said SM, Dom TNM. Impact of tooth loss and preferences for tooth replacement among clinical attendes at a public university. J Dent Ind. 2018; 25(2) : 108-113. DOI: 10.14693/jdi.v25i2.1237
Shah, R. Aras, M. Esthetics in removable partial denture- a review. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2013. 11(4) : 344-8. DOI: 10.3126/kumj.v11i4.13482.
Laney WR, Salinas TJ, Carr AB, Koka S, Eckert, SE. Diagnosis and Treatment in Prosthodontics. 2nd ed. China : Quintessence Publishing. 2011. p. 71.
Wazery MS, Elami MI, Zoalfakar SH. Mechanical properties of glass fiber reinforced polyester composites. Int J Appl Sci Eng. 2017; 14(3): 121 – 131. DOI: 10.6703/IJASE.2017.14(3).121
Hatrick CD, Eakle WS, Bird WE. Dental Material-Clinical applications for dental assistants and dental hygienist. 3nd ed. St.Louis : Elseiver. 2016. p. 19, 300.
Alla RK, Sajjan S, Alluri VR, Ginjupalli K, Upadhya NN. Influence of fiber reinforcement on the properties of denture base resins. J Biomat Nanobiotechno. 2013; 4(1): 91–7. DOI: 10.4236/jbnb.2013.41012
Aditama P, Sugiatno E, Nuryanto MRT. Pengaruh volumetrik e-glass fiber terhadap kekuatan transversal reparasi plat gigi tiruan resin akrilik Maj Ked Gig Ind. 2016; 2(1): 40-6 DOI: 10.22146/majkedgiind.10734
Faizah A, Widjijono W, Nuryono N. Pengaruh komposisi beberapa glass fiber non dental terhadap kelarutan komponen fiber reinforced composites. Maj Ked Gigi Ind. 2016; 2(1): 13–9. DOI: 10.22146/majkedgiind.11249
Sari WP, Sumantri D, Imam DNA, Sunarintyas, S. Pemeriksaan komposisi glass fiber komersial dengan keknik X-ray Fluorescence spectrometer (XRF). J B-Dent. 2014; 1(2): 155 - 160. DOI: 10.22146/majkedgiind.11249
Fonseca RB, Paula MS, Favarao IN, Kasuya AVB. Almeida LN, Mendes GAN, Carlo HL. Reinforcement of dental methacrylate with glass fiber after heated silane application. Hindawi. BioMed Research International. 2014; Volume 2014: 1-5. DOI: 10.1155/2014/364398
Murdiyanto D. Sitotoksisitas non dental glass fiber reinforced composite terhadap sel Fibroblas metode methyltetrazolium test. J Ilmu Ked Gigi (JIKG). 2017; 1(1): 45–51.
Ural C, Sanal FA, Cengiz S. Effect of different denture cleanser on surface roughnes of denture base materials. CDR. 2011; 35(2): 14 -20.
Porta SRDS, Ferreira SCDL, Silva WJD, Cury AADB. Evaluation of sodium hypocloride as a denture: a clinical study. Gerodontology. 2013; 32(4): 1-7.
Vieira APC, Senna PM, Silva WJ, Cury AADB. Long-term efficacy of denture cleansers in preventing candida spp. Biofilm recolonization on liner surface. Braz Oral res. 2010; 24(3): 342-348. DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242010000300014.
Daniel WW, Cross CL. Biostatistic : a foundation for analysis in the health science. 10th ed. John Wiley and sons, inc; New York. 2013 p. 204.
Dahar E, Chandra D. Pengaruh Bahan Pembersih Gigi tiruan terhadap jumlah candida albicans pada basis gigi tiruan resin akrilik polimerisasi
panas yang dipoles dan tidak dipoles. Dentika dental Jurnal. 2014. 18(1) : 75-79.
Jaelani IM, Sari WP, Fadriyanti O. Pengaruh Jumlah Glass Fiber Non Dental pada Reinforced Resin Akrilik (Polimetil metakrilat) terhadap Perlekatan Candida Albicans. J Ked Gigi Unpad. 2019; 31(2): 155-159. DOI: 10.24198/jkg.v31i2.23450
Mortier E, Jager S, Gerdolle DA, Dahoun A. Influence of filler amount on water sorption and solubility of three experimental flowable composite resins. J Materials Sci Eng with Adv Techno. 2013; 7(1): 35–40.
Sathishkumar, T.P. Satheeshkumar, S. Naveen, J. Glass fiber reinforced polymer composites-a review. J Reinforced Plastics Composites. 2014. 33(13) : 1258-275. DOI: 10.1177/0731684414530790
Dewi ZY. The effect of composition glass fiber non dental dan glass fiber dental in fiber reinforced composite to the streptococcus mutans bacteria. J B-Dent. 2016; 3(1): 54 - 58. DOI: 10.33854/JBDjbd.38
Khan AS, Azam MT, Khan M, Mian SA, Rehman IU. An update on glass fiber dental restorative composite : A systematic review. Material Sci. and Eng. C. 2015; 47: 26-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.11.015.
Alla RK. Dental material science. 10th ed. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers
Medical Publishers; 2013. p. 3, 85.
Wang R, Zheng S, Zheng G. Polymer matrix composites and technology. 1st ed. Elsevier : St.Louis, Missouri; 2011. p. 33-4.
Faizah A, Widjijono W, Nuryono N. Pengaruh komposisi beberapa glass fiber non dental terhadap kelarutan komponen fiber reinforced composites. 2016; 2(1): 13-9. DOI: 10.22146/majkedgiind.11249
Matisons JG. Silanes and Siloxanes as Coupling Agent to Glass: A Perspective. Silicone Surface Science. Springer. 2012. p. 281-6. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-3876-8_10
Polydentia. FIBER SPLINT [homepage on internet]. Safety Data Sheet. 2015 [cited 2 Jan 2020]. [about 3 screens] Avaliable from: http://www.polydentia.com.
Girotti N. Guidelines For Using Sodium hypochlorite as a disinfectant for biological waste. 24th ed. Western University: City-Wide Occupational Health & Safety and Workplace Health Version 1.0. 2015; 1 p.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjdrs.v5i1.30886
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Statistik Pengunjung
Padjadjaran Journal of Dental Researchers and Students dilisensikan di bawah Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License