Perbedaan esthetic line (e-line) maloklusi skeletal kelas III sebelum dan setelah perawatan bedah ortognati menggunakan analisis sefalometri ricketts
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Pendahuluan: Maloklusi skeletal kelas III merupakan kelainan dentoskeletal yang kompleks dan merupakan suatu maloklusi yang perawatannya paling sulit terutama pada pasien yang sudah selesai masa pertumbuhan pubertalnya, dimana pada kasus yang parah diperlukan perawatan ortodonti dan bedah ortognati. Terdapat berbagai metode untuk mengevaluasi hasil perawatan bedah ortognati, salah satunya adalah analisis Ricketts Esthetic Line (E-line) yang dapat digunakan untuk melihat perubahan jaringan lunak sebelum dan setelah perawatan bedah ortognati. Tujuan penelitian menganalisis perubahan profil jaringan lunak bibir menggunakan analisis Ricketts Esthetic line (E-line) pada maloklusi skeletal kelas III setelah perawatan bedah ortognati baik pada pembedahan satu rahang dan pembedahan dua rahang. Metode: Jenis penelitian deskriptif analitis komparatif. Sampel penelitian berupa sefalogram lateral sebelum dan setelah perawatan bedah ortognati dengan teknik pembedahan satu ataupun dua rahang Subjek penelitian 8 pasien dengan maloklusi skeletal kelas III yang menjalani bedah ortognati di bagian Bedah Mulut RSGM UNPAD Bandung. Analisis sefalometri diuji dengan uji- t berpasangan untuk melihat perbedaan jaringan lunak bibir sebelum dan setelah bedah ortognati berdasarkan analisis E-line Ricketts. Hasil: Terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan hasil analisis jaringan lunak bibir atas dan bawah terhadap Esthetic line (E-Line) sebelum dan setelah bedah ortognati jarak bibir atas sebelum dan setelah bedah ortognati berbeda secara bermakna p<0,0148, untuk jarak bibir bawah sebelum dan setelah edah ortognati juga berbeda secara bermakna p<0,0204. Hasil uji perbandingan antara sebelum setelah bedah ortognati dibandingkan dengan standar normal analisis E-line Ricketts maka e-line pada jarak bibir atas berbeda secara bermakna p<0,0072, sedangkan untuk bibir bawah tidak berbeda secara bermakna p>0,2413. Simpulan: Perawatan ortodonti dengan bedah ortognati pada maloklusi skeletal kelas III dapat mengubah E-line metode Ricketts secara signifikan, kecuali jarak bibir bawah terhadap norma e-line Ricketts yang tidak berbeda secara bermakna
KATA KUNCI: maloklusi skeletal kelas III, bedah ortognati, analisis Ricketts Esthetic Line (E-line).
Differences in Esthetic Line (e-line) of Class III Skeletal Malocclusion Before and After Orthognathic Surgery Treatment Using Ricketts Cephalometric Analysis: Research desriptive
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Class III skeletal malocclusion is a complex dentoskeletal disorder and is the most difficult malocclusion to treat, especially in patients who have completed their pubertal growth period. In severe cases, orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery are required. There are various methods to evaluate the results of orthognathic surgery, one of which is the Ricketts Esthetic Line (E-line) analysis that can be used to view soft tissue changes before and after orthognathic surgery. The aim of the study was to analyze changes in the soft tissue profile of the lips using Ricketts Esthetic line (E-line) analysis in class III skeletal malocclusion after orthognathic surgery for both one-jaw surgery and two-jaw surgery. Methods: This research is descriptive comparative analysis. The study samples were lateral cephalograms before and after orthognathic surgery with one or two jaw surgery techniques. The study subjects were 8 patients with skeletal class III malocclusion who underwent orthognathic surgery at the Oral Surgery Department of the Padjadjaran University Hospital in Bandung. Cephalometric analysis was tested by paired t-test to see differences in lip soft tissue before and after orthognathic surgery based on Ricketts E-line analysis. Results: There were significant differences in the results of analysis of the soft tissue of the upper and lower lips on the Esthetic line (E-Line) before and after orthognathic surgery. orthognathic was also significantly different p < 0.0204. The results of the comparison test between before after orthognathic surgery compared to standard normal Ricketts E-line analysis showed that the e-line at the distance of the upper lip was significantly different p<0.0072, while for the lower lip it was not significantly different p>0.2413. Conclusion: Orthodontic treatment with orthognathic surgery in class III skeletal malocclusion can significantly change the Ricketts E-line method, except that the distance of the lower lip to the Ricketts e-line norm is not significantly different
KEY WORDS: skeletal class III malocclusion, orthognatic surgery, Ricketts esthetic line (E-line) analysis.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Utari TR, Putri MK. Orthodontic Treatment Needs in Adolescents Aged 13-15 Years Using Orthodontic Treatment Needs Indicators. Journal of Indonesian Dental Association. 2019; 2(2): 49-55.
Karki S, Prajuli U, Kunwar N, et al. Distribution of Malcclusion and Occlusal Traits Among Tibetan Adolescents Residing in Nepal. Orthodontic Journal of Nepal. 2014; 4(2): 195-203.
Ngan P, Moon W, Chen F. Evolution of Class III Treatment in Orthodontics. American J. Of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2015; 148(1): 22-36.
Li C, Cai Y, Chen F. Classification and Characterization of Class III Malocclusion in Chinese Individuals. Biomed Research International. 2016; 12(31): 1-8.
Zere E, Chaudari PK, Sharan J, et al. Developing Class III Malocclusion: Challenges and Solutions. Dovepress, Centre for Dental Education and Research 2018; 10: 99–116.
Bittencourt MAV. Early treatment of patient with Class III skeletal and dental patterns. Dental Press J Orthod 2015; 20: 97–109.
Eslami S, Faber J, Fateh A, et al. Treatment Decision in Adult Patients With Class III Malocclusion: Surgery Versus Orthodontics. Progress in Otrhodontics. 2018; 19:28 2–6.
Aydemir H, Efendiyeva R, et al. Facial Soft Tissue Changes in Class III Patients Treated with Bimaxillary, Maxillary Advancement or Mandibular Set Back Orthognatic Surgery. OHDM 2015; 14(2): 75–80.
Aydemir H, Memikoglu UT. Evaluation of Long-Term Soft Tissue Changes After Bimaxillary Orthognatic surgery in Class III Patients. Angle Orthodontist 2015; 85(4): 631–637.
Chen CM, Lai S, Lee HE, et al. Soft-tissue profile changes after orthognathic surgery of mandibular prognathism. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2012; 28: 216–219.
Kurabe K, Kojima T, Kato Y, et al. Impact of orthognathic surgery on oral health-related quality of life in patients with jaw deformities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 45: 1513–1519.
Jokic D, Jokic D, Uglesic V, et al. Soft Tissue Change After Mandibular Setback and Bimaxillary Surgery in Class III Patients. Angle Ortdontist. 2013; 83(5) : 817-823.
Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics 5th ed. Department of Orthodontics: Elsevier, St. Louis, 2013; 1-5; 685-724.
Darwis RS, Editiawarni T. Hubungan Antara Sudut Interinsisal Terhadap Profil Jaringan lunak Wajah Pada Foto Sefalometri. Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi. 2018; 30i(1) : 1-5.
GhorbanyJavadpor F, Khanemasjedi M. Soft Tissue Facial Profile and Anteroposterior Lip Positioning in Iranians. J Dent Sch Shahid Beheshti Unive Med Sci. 2014; 32: 90-95.
Shindy RA, Sahelangi OP. Gambaran Hasil Analisis Sefalometri Pada Pasien Ras Deutro Melayu Usia 8-12 Tahun Menggunakan Analisis Ricketts. Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Terpadu. 2020; 2(1) : 19-22.
Jacobson A. Radiographic Cephalometry (From Basics 3-D Imaging) 2th ed. pdf. Canada, 2006; 2: 205-217.
Liao YF, Chiu YT, Huang CS, et al. Presurgical Orthodontics Versus No Presurgical Orthodontics: Treatment Outcome of Surgical-Orthodontic Correction for Skeletal Class III Open Bite Title. PRSJournal 2010; 126:2074-2083.
Wolfe SA, Berkowitz S. Le Fort 1 osteotomy. Cleft Lip Palate Diagnosis Management. 2013; 537–554.
Posnick JC. Orthognatic Surgery: Principle and Practice. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Saunder. 2014 : 31; 257-258; 269-271; 289; 361; 695; 753.
Asada K, Motoyoshi M, Tamura T, et al. Satisfaction with Orthognatic Surgery of Skeletal Class III Patients. AJO-DO, 2015; 148:827-837.
Jacobson A. Radiographic Cephalometry (From Basics To Videoimaging). pdf. Alabama, 1995; 1: 87-95.
Siddika A, Rahman SA, Alam MK. Ricketts Cephalometric Analysis For Saudi Population. Association of Support to Oral Health Research. 2020; 20: 1–7.
Boyd SB, Walters AS, Song Y WL. Comparative effectiveness of maxillomandibular advancement and uvu- lopalatopharyngoplasty for the treatment of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 71:743–751.
Yu MS, Ibrahim B, Riley RW, et al. Maxillomandibular advancement and Upper Airway Stimulation: Extrapharyngeal Surgery for obstructive sleep apnea. Clinical Experiment Otorhinolaryngology 2020; 3:225–233.
Agus Aditya Tanadha. Pengaruh Bedah Ortognati Rahang Atas dab Rahang Bawah Terhadap Posisi Bibir Pada Maloklusi Skeletal Kelas III (Analisis Holdaway). Karya Ilmiah Akhir, 2019; 34–40.
Rustemeyer J, Martin A. Soft Tissue Response in Orthognatic Surgery Patient Treated by Bimaxillary Osteotomy: Cephalometry Compared wiyh 2-D Photogrammetry. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 17:33–41.
Mobarak KA, Krogstad O, Espeland L,et al. Factors influencing the predictability of soft
tissue profile changes folowing mandibular setback surgery. Angle Orthod 2001; 3:216–227.
P C. Mandibular setback ostetomy: facial soft tissue behavior and possibility to improve the accuracy of the soft tissue profile prediction with the use of a computerized cephalometric program: Quick Ceph Image Pro: v 2.5. Clin Orth Res; 2. 1999; 2:85-98.
Abeltins A, Jakobsone G. Soft tissue thickness changes after correcting clas III maocclusion with bimaxillar surgery. Stomatol Balt Dent Maxillofac 2011; 3:87–91.
Joss CU, Vassalli ISM, Berge Sj, et al. Soft Tissue Profile Changes After Bilateral Sagital Split Osteotomy for Mandibular Setback: A Systematic Review. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2010; 2792–2801.
Bailey LJ, Dover AJPW. Long-term soft tissue changes after orthodontic and surgical corrections of skeletal class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2007; 3:389–96.
Bhagat LJ, Kannan S, Babu MRS,et al. Soft Tissue Changes Following Combined Anterior Segmental Bimaxillary Orthognatic Procedures. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2019; 1:93–99.
Yahya HY, Alfarra D. Soft Tissue Cephalometric Analysis Of Malay Orthodontic Patients. Int J Pharma Bio Sci 2017; 9: 58–63.
Brahmanta A. Gambaran Sefalometri Skeletal, Dental, dan Jaringan Lunak: Pasien Fase Geligi Pergantian di Kelurahan Sukolilo yang Datang Berobat ke RSGM FKG UHT. Monograf 2017; 1:27–4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjdrs.v7i1.35814
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Statistik Pengunjung
Padjadjaran Journal of Dental Researchers and Students dilisensikan di bawah Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License