Pola sidik bibir suku Batak Mandailing dan Sunda di Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia berdasarkan klasifikasi Suzuki dan Tsuchihashi: studi cross-sectional

Afifah Fitri Amalia; Harfindo Nismal; Desy Purnama Sari

doi:10.24198/pjdrs.v7i3.50334

Pola sidik bibir suku Batak Mandailing dan Sunda di Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia berdasarkan klasifikasi Suzuki dan Tsuchihashi: studi cross-sectional

Afifah Fitri Amalia, Harfindo Nismal, Desy Purnama Sari

Abstract

ABSTRAK

Pendahuluan: Masyarakat pendatang Sumatera Barat berasal dari berbagai suku bangsa di Indonesia, diantaranya Batak Mandailing (proto-melayu) dan Sunda (deutro-melayu). Sumatera Barat dikenal sebagai daerah “Supermarket Bencana” sehingga data antemortem menjadi hal penting bagi individu dalam menentukan identitas, salah satunya dengan sidik bibir. Keunggulan iidentifikasi dengan sidik bibir diantaranya yaitu bersifat permanen sebab tidak berubah sejak usia 6 minggu intrauterine hingga meninggal dunia, bersifat khas, unik dan personal serta mudah dan murah untuk diaplikasika. Tujuan penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pola sidik bibir dominan pada Suku Batak Mandailing dan Sunda di Sumatera Barat berdasarkan klasifikasi Suzuki dan Tsuchihashi. Metode: Jenis penelitian ini merupakan deskriptif observasional menggunakan pendekatan cross sectional dengan metode survei. Sampel berjumlah 28 responden Suku Batak Mandailing dan 28 Suku Sunda. Penentuan etnis responden ditetapkan dari dua generasi sebelumnya, berusia 17-40 tahun, dengan kondisi bibir tidak mengalami inflamasi, kelainan dan tidak pernah dilakukan operasi. Pengambilan sidik bibir menggunakan lipstik, kemudian dicetak dengan selofan dan dianalisis menggunakan sistem komputerisasi. Selanjutnya tipe sidik bibir diklasifikasikan berdasarkan klasifikasi Suzuki dan Tsuchihashi. Hasil: Pola sidik bibir yang ditemukan pada Suku Batak Mandailing adalah tipe I (60,7%) dan tipe III (28,6%), Sunda tipe I (82,1%). Simpulan: Pola sidik bibir berdasarkan klasifikasi Suzuki dan Tsuchihashi, paling banyak dijumpai pada Suku Batak Mandailing dan Suku Sunda di Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat adalah tipe I (vertikal lengkap).

KATA KUNCI: pola, sidik bibir, suku, klasifikasi, suzuki dan tsuchihashi

Lip Pattern Types among Mandailing Bataknese and Sundanese in Padang City, Sumatera Barat Province, Indonesia: cross-sectional study

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The immigrant community from West Sumatra comes from various ethnic groups in Indonesia, including Batak Mandailing (proto-Malay) and Sundanese (deutro-Malay). West Sumatra is known as a "Disaster Supermarket" region, so antemortem data is important for individuals in determining identity, one of which is lip prints. The advantages of lip patterns include being permanent because it does not change from the age of six weeks intraurine until death, being specific, unique and individual, and being simple and cheap to apply. This study aims to determine the dominant lip print pattern of the Mandailing and Sundanese Batak Tribes in West Sumatra based on the Suzuki and Tsuchihashi classifications. Methods: The type of research is descriptive observational study using a cross-sectional approach with survey methods. The sample consisted of 28 respondents from the Mandailing Batak tribe and 28 respondents from the Sundanese tribe. The ethnicity of the respondents was determined by the previous two descendants, aged 17–40 years, with lips that had no inflammation or abnormalities and had never had surgery. Lip prints are taken using lipstick, then printed with cellophane and analyzed using a computerized system. Next, the types of lip prints are classified based on the Suzuki and Tsuchihashi classifications. Results: The dominant lip print patterns of the Mandailing Batak tribe are type I (60,7%) and type III (28,6%); while Sundanese lip print pattern is type I (82.1%). Conclusion: The dominant lip print patterns of the Mandailing Batak and Sundanese tribe are types I (complete vertical).

KEY WORDS: pattern, lip prints, ethnicity, suzuki, and tsuchihashi, classification

Keywords

Pola, Sidik Bibir, Suku, Klasifikasi, Suzuki dan Tsuchihashi, pattern, lip prints, ethnicity, suzuki, and tsuchihashi, classification

Full Text:

PDF

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. Indeks Rawan Bencana Indonesia. 2011; 16-37.

Sinulingga AA, Apriwan, Moenir HD. Kepemerintahan Bencana di Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Dialog Penanggulangan Bencana. 2014; 5(2): 104–14.

Larasati AW, Irianto MG, Bustomi EC. Peran Pemeriksaan Odontologi Forensik Dalam Mengidentifikasi Identitas Korban Bencana Masal. Majority. 2018; 7(3): 228–33.

Remya S, Priyadarshini T, Umadethan B, Gopalan M, Jeyaseelan N. Cheiloscopy-A Study of Lip Prints for Personal Identification. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-ISSN. 2016; 15(2): 101–3. DOI: 10.9790/0853-1525101103

Jaber M, Rama Varma S, Hassan M, Hadi K, Khamis A. Assessment of lip print (cheiloscopy) patterns and its use for personal identification and crime investigation: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis. J Int Dent Med Res. 2023; 16(2): 331-9

Loganadan S, Dardjan M, Murniati N, Oscandar F, Malinda Y, Zakiawati D. Preliminary research: Description of Lip Print Patterns in Children and Their Parents Among Deutero-Malay Population in Indonesia. Int J Dent. 2019; 2019(1): 1–6. DOI: 10.1155/2019/7629146.

Afandi D, Mandatasari M. Hubungan antara Pola Sidik Bibir dan Jenis Suku Melayu Riau. Maj Ked Bandung. 2017; 49(4): 231–6. DOI: 10.15395/mkb.v49n4.1147

Indri Seta Septadina. Identifikasi Individu dan Jenis Kelamin Berdasarkan Pola Sidik Bibir. J Ked Kes. 2015; 2(2): 231–6.

Xu NX, Osman K, Hamzah SPAA, Hamzah NH. Lip Prints in Sex and Race Determination. J Sains Kes Malay. 2012; 10(1): 29–33.

Rao BK, Natarajan D, Samuel SR. Evaluation and comparison of lip print patterns among indians, chinese and malay. Guident. 2014; 1(1): 16–8.

BPS. Kewarganegaraan Suku Bangsa Agama dan Bahasa Sehari-hari Penduduk Indonesia. Badan Pusat Statistik. 2012. h.1-11

Putri MM, Rusdi. Ethnic Migration of Batak Mandailing (Case Study in Sungai Kuyung Village Nagari Inderapura Selatan Pesisir Selatan. Kronologi. 2020; 2(4): 199–205. DOI: 10.24036/jk.v2i4.70

Rivani R, F YS, Rusman AA, Linasari D. Perbandingan Indeks Sefalik Antara Populasi Batak dan Populasi Sunda di Bandung. Prosiding Pertemuan Ilmiah Tahunan. 2017; 1(1): 15–6.

Fauzia RU, Hidayat B, Oscandar F. Deteksi Citra Sidik Bibir Suku Sunda dan Suku Minangkabau dengan Metode Histogram of Oriented Gradient (HOG) dan Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) pada Populasi Mahasiswa Universitas Telkom. e-Proceeding of Engineering. 2019; 6(1): 538–46.

Syaputra R. Identifikasi Pola Sidik Bibir dan Ukuran Bibir pada Etnis Tinghoa, Tamil, Batak di Lingkungan Medan Petisah. Jurnal Kedokteran Ibnu Nafis. 2019; 9(2): 21–9. DOI: 10.30743/jkin.v9i2.423

Vardini N, Tjong DH, Syaifullah. Variasi Pola Sidik Bibir pada Suku Jawa, Batak dan Cina di Sumatera Barat. In: Akhmad Aminuddin Bama, Heron Surbakti, Arsali, Supardi, Aldes Lesbani, Muharni, et al., editors. Prosiding Semirata Bidang MIPA. Palembang: BKS-PTN Wilayah Barat; 2016. p. 2761–5.

Siregar R. Sidik Bibir sebagai Sarana Identifikasi dalam Kedokteran Gigi Forensik pada Etnis Batak Toba. Dentistry e-Journal. 2018;1(2):12–20.

Zaaba NAAB, Gheena S. Cheiloscopy: The Study of Lip Prints in Sex Identification Between Indian and Malaysian Population. Indian J Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. 2020; 14(1): 356–61. DOI: 10.37506/ijfmt.v14i1.71

Prabhu R, Dinkar A, Prabhu V, Rao P. Cheiloscopy: Revisited. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012; 4(1): 47. DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.99167

Mahmoud NF, Afify MM, Elbendary RN, Shokry DA. Variations in Morphological Patterns of Lip Prints as Evidence in Racial and Sexual Discrimination. J Forensic Res. 2020 ;11(1): 1–7.

Koneru A, Surekha R, Nellithady G, Ramesh D, Patil R, Vanishree M. Comparison of lip prints in two different populations of India: Reflections based on a preliminary examination. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2013; 5(1): 11-15. DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.114543

Suyemoto, K. L., Curley, M., & Mukkamala, S. (2020). What Do We Mean by “Ethnicity” and “Race”? A Consensual Qualitative Research Investigation of Colloquial Understandings. Genealogy, 4(3), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy4030081

George R, Nora Afandi NS, Zainal Abidin SN, Binti Ishak NI, Soe HH, Ismail AR. Inheritance pattern of lip prints among Malay population: A pilot study. J Forensic Leg Med. 2016; 39: 156-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2016.01.021.

Hamzah NH, Jamaludin UK, Osman K, Gabriel GF. Digital Approach for Lip Prints Analysis in Malaysian Malay population (Klang Valley): Scanning Technique. J Sains Kes Malay. 2021; 19(01): 31–8. DOI: 10.17576/jskm-2021-1901-04

Haroun A, Awooda E. Morphologic Patterns of Lip Prints in a Sample of Sudanese Population: A Cross-sectional Study. International Journal of Preventive and Clinical Dental Research. 2021; 8(2): 31. DOI: 10.4103/ijpcdr.ijpcdr_45_20

Yendriwati Y, Joe JW, Fitri AR. Lip Print as a Method for Forensic Identification on Malaysian with Chinese Ethnicity. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2019; 8(37): 2831–5. DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2019/615

Badiye A, Kapoor N. Morphologic Variations of Lip-print Patterns in a Central Indian Population: A Preliminary Study. Med Sci Law. 2016; 56(3): 200–4. DOI: 10.1177/0025802415605538.

Ahmed SA, Salem HE, Fawzy MM. Forensic Dissection of Lip Print as an Investigative Tool in a Mixed Egyptian Population. Alexandria Journal of Medicine. 2018; 54(3): 235–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajme.2017.08.002

Adamu LH, Taura MG, Hamman WO, Ojo SA, Dahiru AU, Sadeeq AA, et al. Study of Lip Print Types Among Nigerians. HOMO- Journal of Comparative Human Biology. 2015; 66(6): 561–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchb.2015.08.002.

Moshfeghi M, Beglou A, Mortazavi H, Bahrololumi N. Morphological Patterns of Lip Prints in An Iranian Population. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016; 8(5): 550–5. DOI: 10.4317/jced.52921

Yuliani U, Hidayat B, Zakiawati D. Deteksi Pola Sidik Bibir Suku Sunda Berdasarkan Registrasi Citra Digital Menggunakan Metode Histogram of Oriented Gradients dan Support Vector Machine. e-Proceeding of Engineering. 2019; 6(1): 576–83.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjdrs.v7i3.50334